Composite sandwich structures composed of artificial materials are widely used. However, manufacturing artificial materials requires extensive energy and significantly impact our environment. Therefore, there is a growing focus on manufacturing composites using natural materials. This study used flax fabric, cotton fabric, glass fiber fabric, and polylactic acid (PLA) to fabricate the facesheets of sandwich beams, with balsa panels used as the cores. Tensile, flexure, tensile-after-impact (TAI), and flexure-after-impact (FAI) tests were conducted on the constituent materials and the sandwich beams. As expected, glass fiber reinforced PLA (GFRP) exhibited the highest tensile, flexural, and TAI properties compared to flax fiber reinforced PLA (FFRP) and cotton fiber reinforced PLA (CoFRP) and contributed to the highest FAI strengths in the sandwich beams using GFRP facesheets. It was also observed that a stiffer facesheet resulted in more core crushing in its sandwich beams when subjected to FAI tests, while a weaker facesheet led to more debonding in its sandwich beams. Since sustainable natural materials have been attracting research interest and are used in various areas, this work contributes to using natural composite materials and sustainable development.
ClyneTWHullD. An introduction to composite materials. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
2.
GibsonRF. Principles of composite material mechanics. 4th edn.Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, 2016.
3.
SharafTFamA. Analysis of large scale cladding sandwich panels composed of GFRP skins and ribs and polyurethane foam core. Thin-Walled Struct2013; 71: 91–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2013.05.006.
4.
CameronCJWennhagePGöranssonP, et al.Structural-acoustic design of a multi-functional sandwich panel in an automotive context. J Sandw Struct Mater2010; 12: 684–708. DOI: 10.1177/1099636209359845.
5.
GibsonRF. A review of recent research on mechanics of multifunctional composite materials and structures. Compos Struct2010; 92: 2793–2810. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.003.
6.
BettsDSadeghianPFamA. Experimental behavior and design-oriented analysis of sandwich beams with bio-based composite facings and foam cores. J Compos Construct2018; 22: 04018020. DOI: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000856.
7.
MazzucaP. Flexural behaviour of GFRP sandwich panels with eco-friendly PET foam core for the rehabilitation of building floors. Structures2024; 60: 105815.
8.
SteevesCAFleckNA. Material selection in sandwich beam construction. Scripta Mater2004; 50: 1335–1339. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.015.
9.
MudassirSShankarDRHussainMM. Flexural behavior of sandwich composite panels under 4-point loading. Int J Mater Sci2016; 11: 47–55.
10.
XuePWeiXLiZ, et al.Face-core interfacial debonding characterization model of an all-composite sandwich beam with a hexagonal honeycomb core. Eng Fract Mech2022; 269: 108554. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108554.
11.
BalasubramaniamKSikdarSSomanR, et al.Multi step structural health monitoring approaches in debonding assessment in a sandwich honeycomb composite structure using ultrasonic guided waves. Measurement2022; 194: 111057. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111057.
12.
PakdelEKashiSVarleyR, et al.Recent progress in recycling carbon fibre reinforced composites and dry carbon fibre wastes. Resour Conserv Recycl2021; 166: 105340. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105340.
13.
HowarthJMareddySSRMativengaPT. Energy intensity and environmental analysis of mechanical recycling of carbon fibre composite. J Clean Prod2014; 81: 46–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.023.
14.
AsmatuluETwomeyJOvercashM. Recycling of fiber-reinforced composites and direct structural composite recycling concept. J Compos Mater2014; 48: 593–608. DOI: 10.1177/0021998313476325.
PorrasAMaranonA. Development and characterization of a laminate composite material from polylactic acid (PLA) and woven bamboo fabric. Compos B Eng2012; 43: 2782–2788.
18.
RangappaSMSiengchinSDhakalHN. Green-composites: ecofriendly and sustainability. Applied Science and Engineering Progress2020; 13: 183–184.
19.
AshikKSharmaRS. A review on mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites. J Miner Mater Char Eng2015; 3: 420.
20.
KarimahARidhoMRMunawarSS, et al.A review on natural fibers for development of eco-friendly bio-composite: characteristics, and utilizations. J Mater Res Technol2021; 13: 2442–2458.
21.
JoshiSVDrzalLMohantyA, et al.Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites?Compos Appl Sci Manuf2004; 35: 371–376.
OksmanKBengtssonM. Wood fibre thermoplastic composites: processing, properties and future developments. In: Handbook of engineering biopolymers: homopolymers, blends and composites. Munich, Germany: Hanser Publisher, 2007, pp. 655–671.
24.
KuHWangHPattarachaiyakoopN, et al.A review on the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos B Eng2011; 42: 856–873.
25.
PanciroliRGianniniO. Comparing the impact resistance of flax/epoxy and glass/epoxy composites through experiments and numerical simulations. Compos Struct2021; 264: 113750.
26.
BiswasDDasSMohantoS, et al.EXTRACTION, modification, and characterization of natural polymers used in transdermal drug delivery system: an updated review. Asian J Pharmaceut Clin Res2020; 13: 10–20.
27.
AurasRALimL-TSelkeSE, et al.Poly (lactic acid): synthesis, structures, properties, processing, and applications. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
28.
SharmaSKMudhooA. A handbook of applied biopolymer technology: synthesis, degradation and applications. London, UK: Royal society of chemistry, 2011.
29.
Al ZahmiSAlhammadiSElHassanA, et al.Carbon fiber/PLA recycled composite. Polymers2022; 14: 2194.
30.
RajeshkumarGSeshadriSADevnaniG, et al.Environment friendly, renewable and sustainable poly lactic acid (PLA) based natural fiber reinforced composites–A comprehensive review. J Clean Prod2021; 310: 127483.
31.
OksmanKSkrifvarsMSelinJ-F. Natural fibres as reinforcement in polylactic acid (PLA) composites. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63: 1317–1324.
32.
SinghJIPSinghSDhawanV, et al.Flax fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites for non-structural engineering applications: effect of molding temperature and fiber volume fraction on its mechanical properties. Polym Polym Compos2021; 29: S780–S789. DOI: 10.1177/09673911211025159.
33.
ZhangYLiYMaH, et al.Tensile and interfacial properties of unidirectional flax/glass fiber reinforced hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol2013; 88: 172–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.037.
34.
SampathBNaveenkumarNSampathkumarP, et al.Experimental comparative study of banana fiber composite with glass fiber composite material using Taguchi method. Mater Today Proc2022; 49: 1475–1480. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.232.
35.
NuryantaMISentanuhadyJMuflikhunMA. Moisture absorption behavior of hybrid composite laminates consist of natural and glass fiber. Mater Today Proc2022; 66: 2924–2928.
GalosJDasRSutcliffeMP, et al.Review of balsa core sandwich composite structures. Mater Des2022; 1: 111013.
39.
WangHRamakrishnanKRShankarK. Experimental study of the medium velocity impact response of sandwich panels with different cores. Mater Des2016; 99: 68–82.
40.
BaranIWeijermarsW. Residual bending behaviour of sandwich composites after impact. J Sandw Struct Mater2020; 22: 402–422.
41.
BarouniALuptonCJiangC, et al.Investigation into the fatigue properties of flax fibre epoxy composites and hybrid composites based on flax and glass fibres. Compos Struct2022; 281: 115046.
42.
FuentesCBrughmansGTranL, et al.Mechanical behaviour and practical adhesion at a bamboo composite interface: physical adhesion and mechanical interlocking. Compos Sci Technol2015; 109: 40–47.
