Because of Elliot Eisner’s recent passing, it seems appropriate to note that he actually began his signature work on arts-based research by writing about program evaluation. This article revisits Eisner’s evaluation ideas and briefly considers why Eisner’s thinking about evaluation has had a relatively limited long-term impact on the evaluation field. The article also demonstrates that at least some of Eisner’s arts-based strategies can be effective evaluation tools when certain modifications are made and that Eisner’s thinking is important even for evaluators who are not inclined to use techniques and strategies associated with the arts.
BaroneT.EisnerE. (1997). Arts-based educational research. In JagerR. (Ed.), Complimentary methods for research in education (2nd ed., pp. 73–115). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
DeweyJ. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Perigee Books.
5.
DonmoyerR. (1980). The evaluator as artist: A discussion of premises and problems with examples from two aesthetically based evaluations. The Journalof Curriculum Theorizing, 2, 12–26.
6.
DonmoyerR. (1981). The evaluator as artist. In GirouxH.PennaA.PinarW. (Eds.), Curriculum and instruction: Alternatives in education (pp. 12–26). New York, NY: MacMillan.
7.
DonmoyerR. (1993). Art criticism as a guide to student evaluation. Theory into Practice, 12, 252–259.
8.
DonmoyerR.GallowayF. (2002a). Final report for the first year evaluation of the community of school’s initiative. A joint project of the Ball Foundation and the Chula Vista elementary school district. Glen Ellyn, IL: Ball Foundation.
9.
DonmoyerR.GallowayF. (2002b). Voices in our heads: A montage of ideas encountered during the evaluation of the Ball Foundation’s community of schools project in the Chula Vista elementary school district. Glen Ellyn, IL: Ball Foundation.
10.
DonmoyerR.Yennie-DonmoyerJ. (1995). Data as drama: Reflections on the use of readers theater as a mode of qualitative data display. QualitativeInquiry, 1, 402–428.
11.
DonmoyerR.Yennie-DonmoyerJ. (2008). Readers theater as a mode of qualitative data display. In KnowlesG.ColeA. (Eds.), The arts in qualitative research (pp. 209–224). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
EisnerE. (1967). Instructional and expressive educational objectives: Their formulation and use in curriculum. ERIC document (ED028838).
13.
EisnerE. (1975). The perceptive eye: Toward the reformation of educational evaluation. Washington, DC: Address to Division B, American Educational Research Association.
14.
EisnerE. (1976). Educational connoisseurship and criticism: Their forms and function in educational evaluation. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 10, 135–150.
15.
EisnerE. (1979, 1985, 1994, 2002, [2002]). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York, NY: Macmillan. 2002 printing: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
EisnerE. (1985). The art of educational evaluation: A personal view. London, England: Falmer Press.
17.
EisnerE. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York, NY: Macmillan.
18.
EisnerE. (1993). Forms of understanding and the future of educational research. Presidential address, Annual Meeting of the America Educational Research Association, Atlanta.
19.
EisnerE. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
20.
EllisC. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about auto-ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
21.
FeldmanE. (1970). Becoming human through art. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
FlindersD. (2005). Multiple worlds, multiple ways of knowing. Elliot Eisner’s contributions to educational research. In UrmacherB.MatthewsJ. (Eds.), Intricate palette: Working the ideas of Elliot Eisner (pp. 127–138). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
23.
HamiltonD.JenkinD.KingC.MacDonaldB.ParlettM. (Eds.). (1977). Beyond the numbers game: A reader in educational evaluation. Basingstoke and New York: Macmillan.
24.
HayanoD. (1979). Auto-ethnography: Paradigms, problems and prospects. Human Organization, 38, 113–120.
25.
LevineM. (1974, September). Scientific method and the adversary model. American Psychologist, 29, 666–677.
26.
ParlettM.HamiltonD. (1972). Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovatory programs. Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh Center for Research in the Educational Sciences.
PopeD. (2005). Teaching qualitative inquiry: How Elliot Eisner makes sense. In UrmacherB.MatthewsJ. (Eds.), Intricate palette: Working the ideas of Elliot Eisner (pp. 153–162). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
29.
ScrivenM. (1977). Goal free evaluation. In HamiltonD.JenkinD.KingC.MacDonaldB.ParlettM. (Eds.), Beyond the numbers game: A reader in educational evaluation (pp. 134–138). Basingstoke and New York: Macmillan.
30.
ScrivenM. (1991). Prose and cons about goal-free evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 12, 55–76.
31.
StakeR. (1975). Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.
