Previous studies have yielded inconsistent results about the impact of CEO duality on corporate performance in the hospitality and tourism (H&T) industry. To further delve into this relationship, we investigated the causal relationship between CEO duality and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance under various board characteristics and financial indicators. The data from the Thomson Reuters Eikon database were evaluated using a machine learning technique that included targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW), and neural network analysis, all of which are doubly robust estimators with cross-fitting. The findings suggest that CEO duality negatively impacts environmental pillar scores but not other outcomes (i.e., governance and social pillar scores). Among the governance practices and financial indicators, policy executive compensation performance, policy executive compensation ESG performance, and return on invested capital (ROIC) have positive relations with total ESG scores. The results have important ramifications for helping H&T companies develop effective boards of directors and governance systems, as well as achieve targeted ESG performance objectives.
AboramadanM.KundiY. M.FaraoC. (2021). Examining the effects of environmentally-specific servant leadership on green work outcomes among hotel employees: The mediating role of climate for green creativity. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 30(8), 929–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1912681
2.
AdeneyeY. B.KammounI.Ab WahabS. N. A. (2023). Capital structure and speed of adjustment: The impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(5), 945–977. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2022-0060
3.
AgarwalaN.PareekR.SahuT. N. (2023). Does board independence influence CSR performance? A GMM-based dynamic panel data approach. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(6), 1003–1022. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2020-0433
Al-HiyariA.IsmailA. I.KolsiM. C.KehindeO. H. (2023). Environmental, social and governance performance (ESG) and firm investment efficiency in emerging markets: The interaction effect of board cultural diversity. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(3), 650–673. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0133
6.
Al KurdiA.Al AmoshH.KhatibS. F. (2023). The mediating role of carbon emissions in the relationship between the board attributes and ESG performance: European evidence. EuroMed Journal of Business. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-08-2022-0144
7.
AlmaqtariF. A.HashidA.FarhanN. H.TabashM. I.Al-ahdalW. M. (2022). An empirical examination of the impact of country-level corporate governance on profitability of Indian banks. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(2), 1912–1932. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2250
8.
AlsayeghM. F.Abdul RahmanR.HomayounS. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), Article 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910
9.
ArayssiM.JiziM. (2024). Royal family board directors and the level of ESG disclosures in GCC listed firms. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 20(1), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-08-2022-0123
10.
ArayssiM.JiziM.TabajaH. H. (2020). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0136
11.
AriciH. E.ArasliH.KoseogluM. A.SaydamM. B.OlorunsolaV. O. (2024). Financial determinants of governance scores in hospitality and tourism enterprises. Quality & Quantity, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01820-7
12.
AriciH. E.Cakmakoglu ArıcıN.AltinayL. (2023). The use of big data analytics to discover customers’ perceptions of and satisfaction with green hotel service quality. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(2), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2029832
13.
AriciH. E.UysalM. (2022). Leadership, green innovation, and green creativity: A systematic review. The Service Industries Journal, 42(5–6), 280–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2021.1964482
14.
ArvidssonS.DumayJ. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice?Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937
15.
AzamM.Mahmudul AlamM.Haroon HafeezM. (2018). Effect of tourism on environmental pollution: Further evidence from Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.168
16.
BagheriF.GhaderiZ.AbdiN.HallC. M. (2023). Female entrepreneurship, creating shared value, and empowerment in tourism; the neutralizing effect of gender-based discrimination. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(21), 3465–3482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2126749
BaloghI.SrivastavaM.TyllL. (2022). Towards comprehensive corporate sustainability reporting: An empirical study of factors influencing ESG disclosures of large Czech companies. Society and Business Review, 17(4), 541–573. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-07-2021-0114
19.
BamahrosH. M.AlquhaifA.QasemA.Wan-HussinW. N.ThomranM.Al-DuaisS. D.ShukeriS. N.KhojallyH. M. (2022). Corporate governance mechanisms and ESG reporting: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market. Sustainability, 14(10), Article 6202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106202
20.
BarkoT.CremersM.RenneboogL. (2022). Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), 777–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04850-z
21.
BaumT.CheungC.KongH.KraljA.MooneyS.Nguyễn Thị ThanhH.RamachandranS.Dropulić RužićM.SiowM. (2016). Sustainability and the tourism and hospitality workforce: A thematic analysis. Sustainability, 8(8), Article 809. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080809
22.
BeckM. W. (2018). NeuralNetTools: Visualization and analysis tools for neural networks. Journal of Statistical Software, 85(11), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v085.i11
23.
BhatiaS.MarwahaD. (2022). The influence of board factors and gender diversity on the ESG disclosure score: A study on Indian companies. Global Business Review, 23(6), 1544–1557. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221132067
24.
BoydB. K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160404
25.
BrinetteS.SonmezF. D.TournusP. S. (2023). ESG controversies and firm value: Moderating role of board gender diversity and board independence. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 4298–4307. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3236667
26.
BroyeG.FrançoisA.MoulinY. (2017). The cost of CEO duality: Evidence from French leadership compensation. European Management Journal, 35(3), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.01.007
27.
CamilleriM. A. (2016). Responsible tourism that creates shared value among stakeholders. Tourism Planning & Development, 13(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2015.1074100
28.
CampanellaF.SerinoL.CrisciA.D’AmbraA. (2021). The role of corporate governance in environmental policy disclosure and sustainable development. Generalized estimating equations in longitudinal count data analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 474–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2062
29.
CamposA. C.MendesJ.ValleP. O. D.ScottN. (2018). Co-creation of tourist experiences: A literature review. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(4), 369–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1081158
30.
CapocchiA.ValloneC.PierottiM.AmaduzziA. (2019). Overtourism: A literature review to assess implications and future perspectives. Sustainability, 11(12), Article 3303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123303
31.
CaponiV. (2022). The economic and environmental effects of seasonality of tourism: A look at solid waste. Ecological Economics, 192, Article 107262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107262
32.
ChebbiK.AmmerM. A. (2022). Board composition and ESG disclosure in Saudi Arabia: The moderating role of corporate governance reforms. Sustainability, 14(19), Article 12173. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912173
33.
ChouaibiS.ChouaibiY.ZouariG. (2022). Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: Evidence from ESG European companies. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(4), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-11-2020-0121
34.
ChrismanJ. J. (2019). Stewardship theory: Realism, relevance, and family firm governance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(6), 1051–1066. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719838472
35.
ChurchillS. A.PanL.ParamatiS. R. (2022). Air pollution and tourism: Evidence from G20 countries. Journal of Travel Research, 61(2), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520977724
36.
CucariN.EspositoDeFalcoS.OrlandoB. (2018). Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1452
37.
CurcijaM.BreakeyN.DrimlS. (2019). Development of a conflict management model as a tool for improved project outcomes in community based tourism. Tourism Management, 70, 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.016
38.
DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D.DonaldsonL. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
39.
De VilliersC.NaikerV.Van StadenC. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311411506
40.
Della CorteV.AriaM. (2016). Coopetition and sustainable competitive advantage. The case of tourist destinations. Tourism Management, 54, 524–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.12.009
41.
DisliM.YilmazM. K.MohamedF. F. M. (2022). Board characteristics and sustainability performance: Empirical evidence from emerging markets. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(4), 929–952. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2020-0313
42.
DolezalC.NovelliM. (2022). Power in community-based tourism: Empowerment and partnership in Bali. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(10), 2352–2370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1838527
DonaldsonL.DavisJ. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
45.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
46.
ElkhweskyZ.SalemI. E.VarmusM.RamkissoonH. (2022). Sustainable practices in hospitality pre and amid COVID-19 pandemic: Looking back for moving forward post-COVID-19. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 1426–1448. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2304
47.
ElliliN. O. D. (2023). Impact of corporate governance on environmental, social, and governance disclosure: Any difference between financial and non-financial companies?Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 858–873.
48.
EndrikatJ.GuentherT. W.TitusR. (2020). Consequences of strategic performance measurement systems: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 32(1), 103–136. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-52575
49.
Erkuş-ÖztürkH.EraydınA. (2010). Environmental governance for sustainable tourism development: Collaborative networks and organisation building in the Antalya tourism region. Tourism Management, 31(1), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.01.002
50.
ErtunaB.Karatas-OzkanM.YamakS. (2019). Diffusion of sustainability and CSR discourse in hospitality industry: Dynamics of local context. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(6), 2564–2581. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2018-0464
51.
E-VahdatiS.Wan-HussinW. N.Mohd AriffinM. S. (2023). The value relevance of ESG practices in Japan and Malaysia: Moderating roles of CSR award, and former CEO as a board chair. Sustainability, 15(3), Article 2728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032728
52.
FamaE. F.JensenM. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://www.jstor.org/stable/725104
53.
FardA.SirajI.WangB. (2022). Don’t interfere with my rights! Employee rights violation and the cost of bank loans. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 31(5), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.12167
54.
Fernández-RobinC.Celemín-PedrocheM. S.Santander-AstorgaP.Alonso-AlmeidaM. D. M. (2019). Green practices in hospitality: A contingency approach. Sustainability, 11(13), Article 3737. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133737
55.
FinkelsteinS.D’aveniR. A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1079–1108. https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.12167
56.
FosterB. P.ManikasA. S.KroesJ. R. (2023). Which diversity measures best capture public company value?Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 236–247.
57.
Gabarda-MallorquíA.GarciaX.RibasA. (2017). Mass tourism and water efficiency in the hotel industry: A case study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 61, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.11.006
58.
GarciaO.CaterC. (2022). Life below water; challenges for tourism partnerships in achieving ocean literacy. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(10), 2428–2447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1850747
59.
GazoniJ. L.BrasileiroI. L. G. (2022). Public visitation and deforestation in protected areas of the Brazilian Amazon: An application of the Linear Probability Model. Journal of Ecotourism, 21(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2021.1928145
60.
GeH.ChenS.ChenY. (2018). International alliance of green hotels to reach sustainable competitive advantages. Sustainability, 10(3), Article 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020573
61.
Geoffrey DelademT.XiaoZ.SiueiaT. T.DokuS.TetteyI. (2021). Developing sustainable tourism through public-private partnership to alleviate poverty in Ghana. Tourist Studies, 21(2), 317–343.
62.
GiniA.GreenR. M. (2014). Three critical characteristics of leadership: Character, stewardship, experience. Business and Society Review, 119(4), 435–446.
63.
GlynnA. N.QuinnK. M. (2010). An introduction to the augmented inverse propensity weighted estimator. Political Analysis, 18(1), 36–56.
64.
GösslingS.PeetersP.HallC. M.CeronJ.-P.DuboisG.LehmannL. V.ScottD. (2012). Tourism and water use: Supply, demand, and security. An international review. Tourism Management, 33(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.03.015
65.
GruberS.van der LaanM. J. (2012). Targeted minimum loss based estimator that outperforms a given estimator. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 8(1), 1–22.
66.
GuilletB. D.SeoK.KucukustaD.LeeS. (2013). CEO duality and firm performance in the U.S. restaurant industry: Moderating role of restaurant type. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.10.004
67.
GullA. A.HussainN.KhanS. A.MushtaqR.OrijR. (2023). The power of the CEO and environmental decoupling. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3951–3964.
68.
GuptaV. K.HanS.NandaV.SilveriS. (2018). When crisis knocks, call a powerful CEO (or not): Investigating the contingent link between CEO power and firm performance during industry turmoil. Group & Organization Management, 43(6), 971–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116671603
69.
GurolB.LagasioV. (2022). Women board members’ impact on ESG disclosure with environment and social dimensions: Evidence from the European banking sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(1), 211–228.
70.
GuzzoR. F.AbbottJ.MaderaJ. M. (2020). A micro-level view of CSR: A hospitality management systematic literature review. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 61(3), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965519892907
71.
HaqueF. (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 347–364.
72.
HarunM. S.HussaineyK.Mohd KharuddinK. A.FarooqueO. A. (2020). CSR disclosure, corporate governance and firm value: A study on GCC Islamic banks. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(4), 607–638.
73.
HermalinB. E.WeisbachM. S. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, 88(1), 96–118.
74.
HernandezM. (2012). Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 172–193.
HoqueM. A.LovelockB.CarrA. (2022). Alleviating Indigenous poverty through tourism: The role of NGOs. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(10), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1860070
77.
HrebiniakL. G.SnowC. C. (1980). Industry differences in environmental uncertainty and organizational characteristics related to uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4), 750–759.
78.
HussainN.RigoniU.OrijR. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
79.
HustedB. W.de Sousa-FilhoJ. M. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220–227.
80.
IazziA.PizziS.IaiaL.TurcoM. (2020). Communicating the stakeholder engagement process: A cross-country analysis in the tourism sector. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1642–1652. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1913
81.
IoannidisA.ChalvatzisK. J.LeonidouL. C.FengZ. (2021). Applying the reduce, reuse, and recycle principle in the hospitality sector: Its antecedents and performance implications. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3394–3410. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2809
82.
JamalT.StronzaA. (2009). Collaboration theory and tourism practice in protected areas: Stakeholders, structuring and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495741
JensenM. C. (1994). Self-interest, altruism, incentives, and agency theory. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(2), 40–45.
85.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
86.
JesoverF.KirkpatrickG. (2005). The revised OECD principles of corporate governance and their relevance to non-OECD countries. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 127–136.
87.
JosephJ.OcasioW.McDonnellM. H. (2014). The structural elaboration of board independence: Executive power, institutional logics, and the adoption of CEO-only board structures in US corporate governance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1834–1858.
88.
KhaledR.AliH.MohamedE. K. A. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals and corporate sustainability performance: Mapping, extent and determinants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, Article 127599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127599
89.
KılıçM.UyarA.KuzeyC.KaramanA. S. (2021). Drivers and consequences of sustainability committee existence? Evidence from the hospitality and tourism industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, Article 102753.
90.
KimD.MarinM. J.RichardsonG. D.SalterioS. E.TsangA. (2023). Modeling board governance, environmental expertise, and social engagement effects on firm environmental performance: Panel data evidence. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 19(2), Article 100364.
91.
KimY. H.BarberN.KimD. K. (2019). Sustainability research in the hotel industry: Past, present, and future. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 28(5), 576–620.
92.
KrauseR.SemadeniM.CannellaA. A.Jr. (2014). CEO duality: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40(1), 256–286.
LagasioV.CucariN. (2019). Corporate governance and environmental social governance disclosure: A meta-analytical review. Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Management, 26(4), 701–711.
95.
LavinJ. F.Montecinos-PearceA. A. (2022). Heterogeneous firms and benefits of ESG disclosure: Cost of debt financing in an emerging market. Sustainability, 14(23), Article 15760.
96.
LewellynK. B.FainshmidtS. (2017). Effectiveness of CEO power bundles and discretion context: Unpacking the ‘fuzziness’ of the CEO duality puzzle. Organization Studies, 38(11), 1603–1624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685364
97.
LiY.SingalM. (2022). Corporate governance in the hospitality and tourism industry: Theoretical foundations and future research. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 46(7), 1347–1383.
98.
López-GameroM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F.Claver-CortésE. (2011). Environmental uncertainty and environmental management perception: A multiple case study. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 427–435.
99.
ManitaR.BrunaM. G.DangR.HouantiL. (2018). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: Evidence from the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2017-0024
100.
ManoharanA.SingalM. (2017). A systematic literature review of research on diversity and diversity management in the hospitality literature. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 66, 77–91.
101.
MenicucciE.PaolucciG. (2022). Board diversity and ESG performance: Evidence from the Italian banking sector. Sustainability, 14(20), Article 13447.
102.
MirandaB.DelgadoC.BrancoM. C. (2023). Board characteristics, social trust and ESG performance in the European banking sector. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(4), Article 244.
103.
MomayezA.RasouliN.AlimohammadirokniM.RasoolimaneshS. M. (2023). Green entrepreneurship orientation, green innovation and hotel performance: The moderating role of managerial environmental concern. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 32(8), 981–1004.
104.
Mu YehC. (2013). Board governance and tourism firms’ performance: The case of Taiwan. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 14(2), 123–141.
105.
MuttakinM. B.KhanA.MihretD. G. (2018). The effect of board capital and CEO power on corporate social responsibility disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3105-y
106.
NacitiV. (2019). Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, Article 117727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727
107.
NaimiA. I.RudolphJ. E.KennedyE. H.CartusA.KirkpatrickS. I.HaasD. M.SimhanH.BodnarL. M. (2020). Incremental propensity score effects for time-fixed exposures. Epidemiology, 32(2), 202–208.
108.
NgA. W.LeungT. C. H.YuT. W.ChoC. H.WutT. M. (2023). Disparities in ESG reporting by emerging Chinese enterprises: Evidence from a global financial center. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(2), 343–368.
109.
NguyenC. P.NguyenB. Q.TranD. T. L. (2023). Over two decades of severe deforestation: An economic perspective of tourism development. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 13(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-022-00802-9
110.
NguyenL. T. M.NguyenP. T. (2023). The board profiles that promote environmental, social, and governance disclosure–Evidence from S&P 500 firms. Finance Research Letters, 55, Article 103925.
111.
NicoloG.ZamponeG.SanninoG.Tiron-TudorA. (2023). Worldwide evidence of corporate governance influence on ESG disclosure in the utilities sector. Utilities Policy, 82, Article 101549.
112.
OlorunsolaV. O.SaydamM. B.AriciH. E.KöseogluM. A. (2023). The predictive roles of financial indicators and governance scores on firms’ emission performance in the tourism and hospitality industry. Tourism Economics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166231207132
113.
OrazalinN.MahmoodM. (2021). Toward sustainable development: Board characteristics, country governance quality, and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3569–3588. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2820
114.
OrtasE.Gallego-ÁlvarezI.ÁlvarezI. (2019). National institutions, stakeholder engagement, and firms’ environmental, social, and governance performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 598–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1706
115.
OyewoB. (2023). Corporate governance and carbon emissions performance: International evidence on curvilinear relationships. Journal of Environmental Management, 334, Article 117474.
116.
OzdemirO.ErkmenE.BineshF. (2022). Board diversity and firm risk-taking in the tourism sector: Moderating effects of board independence, CEO duality, and free cash flows. Tourism Economics, 28(7), 1782–1804. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166211014367
117.
ParkJ. H.KimC.ChangY. K.LeeD. H.SungY. D. (2018). CEO hubris and firm performance: Exploring the moderating roles of CEO power and board vigilance. Journal of Business Ethics, 147, 919–933.
118.
PorterB. W.SalazarN. B. (2005). Heritage tourism, conflict, and the public interest: An introduction. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11(5), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250500337397
119.
PrevitaliP.CerchielloP. (2023). Corporate governance and anti-corruption disclosure. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(6), 1217–1232.
120.
PykeJ.LawA.JiangM.De LacyT. (2018). Learning from the locals: The role of stakeholder engagement in building tourism and community resilience. Journal of Ecotourism, 17(3), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2018.1505586
121.
RajeshR.RajendranC. (2020). Relating environmental, social, and governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1247–1267. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2429
122.
RanaweerageE.RanjeewaA. D. G.SugimotoK. (2015). Tourism-induced disturbance of wildlife in protected areas: A case study of free ranging elephants in Sri Lanka. Global Ecology and Conservation, 4, 625–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.10.013
123.
RandleM.KempermanA.DolnicarS. (2019). Making cause-related corporate social responsibility (CSR) count in holiday accommodation choice. Tourism Management, 75, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.05.002
124.
Rastrollo-HorrilloM. A.Rivero DiazM. (2019). Destination social capital and innovation in SMEs tourism firms: An empirical analysis in an adverse socio-economic context. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(10), 1572–1590.
125.
RechnerP. L.DaltonD. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120206
126.
RhouY.SingalM. (2020). A review of the business case for CSR in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 84, Article 102330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102330
127.
RitzR. A. (2022). Linking executive compensation to climate performance. California Management Review, 64(3), 124–140.
128.
RobertsJ.McNultyT.StilesP. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16(s1), S5–S26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00444.x
129.
RomanoM.CirilloA.FavinoC.NettiA. (2020). ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) performance and board gender diversity: The moderating role of CEO duality. Sustainability, 12(21), Article 9298.
130.
RoxasF. M. Y.RiveraJ. P. R.GutierrezE. L. M. (2020). Mapping stakeholders’ roles in governing sustainable tourism destinations. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.09.005
131.
SahlianD. N.PopaA. F.NicoarăȘ. A.Bâtcă-DumitruC. G. (2023). Examining the causality between integrated reporting and stock market capitalization. The case of the European renewable energy equipment and services industry. Energies, 16(3), Article 1398.
132.
ScheyvensR.HughesE. (2019). Can tourism help to “end poverty in all its forms everywhere”? The challenge of tourism addressing SDG1. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(7), 1061–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1551404
133.
SegalL.LehrerM. (2012). The institutionalization of stewardship: Theory, propositions, and insights from change in the Edmonton public schools. Organization Studies, 33(2), 169–201.
134.
SerafeimG. (2020). Public sentiment and the price of corporate sustainability. Financial Analysts Journal, 76(2), 26–46.
135.
ShahbazM.KaramanA. S.KilicM.UyarA. (2020). Board attributes, CSR engagement, and corporate performance: What is the nexus in the energy sector?Energy Policy, 143, Article 111582.
136.
ShakilM. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72, Article 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144
137.
SharmaR. (2023). Hospitality sustainable practices, a global perspective. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 15(3), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-02-2023-0022
138.
ShrivastavaP.AddasA. (2014). The impact of corporate governance on sustainability performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 4(1), 21–37.
139.
SongH. J.KangK. H. (2019a). Implementing corporate social responsibility strategies in the hospitality and tourism firms: A culture-based approach. Tourism Economics, 25(4), 520–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618803180
140.
SongH. J.KangK. H. (2019b). The moderating effect of CEO duality on the relationship between geographic diversification and firm performance in the US lodging industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(3), 1488–1504. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2017-0848
141.
SrivastavaP. K.GuptaM.SinghU.PrasadR.PandeyP. C.RaghubanshiA. S.PetropoulosG. P. (2021). Sensitivity analysis of artificial neural network for chlorophyll prediction using hyperspectral data. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 5504–5519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00827-6
142.
StylosN.VassiliadisC. (2015). Differences in sustainable management between four-and five-star hotels regarding the perceptions of three-pillar sustainability. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 24(8), 791–825.
143.
SuttipunM. (2021). The influence of board composition on environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure of Thai listed companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(4), 391–402.
144.
TamimiN.SebastianelliR. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660–1680.
145.
TangJ. (2017). CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of other executives and blockholding outside directors. European Management Journal, 35(3), 362–372.
146.
TijaniA.AhmadiA. (2022). An empirical study of the relationship between the busy outside directors and indicators of ESG performance. Decision Science Letters, 11(3), 323–332.
147.
TingI. W. K.AzizanN. A.BhaskaranR. K.SukumaranS. K. (2019). Corporate social performance and firm performance: Comparative study among developed and emerging market firms. Sustainability, 12(1), 26.
TorfingJ.BentzenT. Ø. (2020). Does stewardship theory provide a viable alternative to control-fixated performance management?Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 86.
150.
TorresP.AugustoM. (2021). Attention to social issues and CEO duality as enablers of resilience to exogenous shocks in the tourism industry. Tourism Management, 87, Article 104400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104400
UppalN. (2020). CEO narcissism, CEO duality, TMT agreeableness and firm performance: An empirical investigation in auto industry in India. European Business Review, 32(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-06-2019-0121
153.
UsmanO.ElsalihO.KoshadhO. (2020). Environmental performance and tourism development in EU-28 Countries: The role of institutional quality. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(17), 2103–2108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1635092
154.
UyarA.KilicM.KoseogluM. A.KuzeyC.KaramanA. S. (2020). The link among board characteristics, corporate social responsibility performance, and financial performance: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, Article 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100714
155.
UyarA.KuzeyC.KilicM.KaramanA. S. (2022). Does firms’ CSR engagement support tourism sector development? Moderation effect of CSR committee and CEO duality. Tourism Economics, 28(8), 1973–1997. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166211024502
WangC.HuR.ZhangT. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in international hotel chains and its effects on local employees: Scale development and empirical testing in China. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, Article 102598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102598
158.
WangL. (2021). Causal analysis of conflict in tourism in rural China: The peasant perspective. Tourism Management Perspectives, 39, Article 100863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100863
159.
WangM.JiangJ.XuS.GuoY. (2021). Community participation and residents’ support for tourism development in ancient villages: The mediating role of perceptions of conflicts in the tourism community. Sustainability, 13(5), Article 2455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052455
160.
WellsV. K.Gregory SmithD.TaheriB.ManikaD.McCowlenC. (2016). An exploration of CSR development in heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 58, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2016.01.007
XuX.XiaoG.GursoyD. (2017). Maximizing profits through optimal pricing and sustainability strategies: A joint optimization approach. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 26(4), 395–415.
164.
YadavP.JainA. (2023). Sustainability disclosures and corporate boards: A stakeholder approach to decision-making. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(5), 1027–1047.
YangT.ZhaoS. (2014). CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous shock to the competitive environment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 49, 534–552.
167.
Yrjö CollinS.-O.SmithE.UmansT.BrobergP.TagessonT. (2013). Mechanisms of corporate governance going international: Testing its performance effects in the Swedish economy, 2004. Baltic Journal of Management, 8(1), 79–101.
168.
YuE. P.GuoC. Q.LuuB. V. (2018). Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2047
169.
YuM. (2023). CEO duality and firm performance: A systematic review and research agenda. European Management Review, 20(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12522
170.
YuY.ZhangM.ShiX.CaramM. E. V.LittleR. J. A.MukherjeeB. (2021). A comparison of parametric propensity score-based methods for causal inference with multiple treatments and a binary outcome. Statistics in Medicine, 40(7), 1653–1677. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8862
171.
ZhuH.ZhuQ.DingZ. (2020). The roles of Chinese CEOs in managing individualistic cultures in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies, 57(3), 664–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12556
