This study investigates the visitor experience at a Swedish nature center within a UNESCO biosphere reserve. The question of whether this interpretive facility succeeds in motivating the visitor to get outdoors for a direct experience of nature is explored. Use of the environmental connectedness perspective and concerns about diminished nature experience support the importance of this study. A number of qualitative methodologies are used to investigate the research questions, including thought listing, phenomenology, and field observation. Results indicate that this particular nature center generally succeeded in the goal of inspiring visitors for a direct nature experience. The success in motivating visitors appears to be a result of a number of key variables, including place-based exhibitry, access, and personal visitor factors. Given the setting for this study, we conclude that interpretive nature centers have the potential to play an important role in the re-imagination of urban environments.
AllenS. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain.Wiley InterScience, S17–S33.
2.
AlpertL., and HerringtonL. P. (1998). An interactive information kiosk for the Adirondack Park Visitor Interpretive Center, Newcomb, NY. In VogelsongH. G., (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1997 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium (pp. 265–267). Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
3.
BeeryT., and Wolf-WatzD. (2014). Nature to place: Rethinking the environmental connectedness perspective.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 198–205.
4.
BixlerR. D., JamesJ. J., and VadalaC. E. (2011). Environmental socialization incidents with implications for the expanded role of interpretive naturalists in providing natural history experiences.Journal of Interpretation Research, 16 (1), 35–66.
5.
BloombergL. D., and VolpeM. (2008). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A roadmap from beginning to end.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
BratmanG. N., HamiltonJ. P., and DailyG. C. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health.Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1249, 119–136.
7.
BroderickP. C. (2005). Mindfulness and coping with dysphoric mood: Contrasts with rumination and distraction.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29 (5), 502–510.
8.
BucyD. (2005). Applying communication theory to design, location and evaluation of interpretive signs. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Idaho.
9.
CacioppoJ. T., and Von HippelW. (1997). Mapping cognitive structures and processes through verbal content: The thought listing technique.Journal of Consulting, 65 (6), 928–940.
10.
CadinuM., MaassA., and RosabiancaA. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking.Psychological Science, 16 (7), 572–578.
11.
CastreeN. (2005). Nature.New York: Routledge.
12.
CastreeN. (2014). Making sense of nature.New York: Routledge.
13.
CharlesC., and LogeA. S. (2012a). Children's contact with the outdoors and nature: A focus on educators and educational settings.Children & Nature Network.
14.
DudleyN. (2011). Authenticity in nature: Making choices about the naturalness of ecosystems.London: Earthscan.
15.
EricksonE., and EricksonJ. (2006). Lessons learned from environmental education center directors.Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 5 (1), 1–8.
16.
ErnstJ. (2012). Early childhood nature play: A needs assessment of Minnesota licensed childcare providers.Journal of Interpretation Research, 17 (1), 7–24.
17.
EulerA. (1989). A comparative study of the effectiveness of a local environmental center's program for urban sixth-grader's environmental knowledge and attitudes.Children's Environments Quarterly, 6(2/3).
18.
FeldmanJ. (2004). Rewilding the islands: Nature, history, and policy at Apostle Islands National Lakeshore. (Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison).
19.
FolkeC., JanssonÅ., RockströmJ., OlssonP., CarpenterS. R., ChapinA. S., and WestleyF. (2011). Reconnecting to the biosphere.Ambio, 40 (7), 719–738.
20.
GottliebR. (2007). Reinventing Los Angeles: Nature and community in the global city.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
HamS. (2013). Interpretation: Making a difference on purpose.Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishers.
HeadL. (2000). Cultural landscapes and environmental change.New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
HeadL. (2012). Conceptualising the human in cultural landscapes and resilience thinking. In PliennigerT., BielingC. (Eds.), Resilience and the cultural landscape (pp. 65–79). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HinchliffeS. (2007). Geographies of nature: Societies, environments, ecologies.London: Sage.
26.
HongA., and AndersonD. H. (2006). Barriers to participation for latino people at Dodge Nature Center.The Journal of Environmental Education, 37 (4), 33–44.
27.
HycnerR. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data.Human Studies, 8 (3), 279–303.
JensenE. L., and OuisP. (2014). Det gröna finrummet: Etnicitet, friluftsliv och naturumgängets urbanisering.Stockholm: Carlssons.
30.
KahnP. H. (2002). Children's affiliations with nature: Structure, development, and the problem of environmental generational amnesia. In KahnP. H. J., KellertS. R. (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 93–116). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
KahnP. H., and FriedmanB. (1995). Environmental views and values of children in an inner-city black community.Child Development, 66, 1403–1417.
32.
KostkaD. (1976). Nature center program impact.The Journal of Environmental Education, 8 (1), 52–64.
33.
LentR. W., BrownS. D., and GoverM. R. (1996). Cognitive assessment of the sources of mathematics self efficacy: A thought-listing analysis.Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 33–46.
34.
LodgeJ., TrippG., and HarteD. K. (2000). Think-aloud, thought-listing, and video-mediated recall procedures in the assessment of children's self-talk.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24 (4), 399–418.
35.
LouvR. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder.Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.
36.
MallerC., TownsendM., PryorA., BrownP., and LegerL. St. (2006). Healthy nature healthy people: ‘contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations.Health Promotion International, 21 (1), 45–54.
37.
MarrisE. (2011). Rambunctious garden: Saving nature in a post-wild world.New York: Bloomsbury.
38.
MatteoG., StephanB., and LarsM. (2014). Nature routine and affinity with the biosphere: A case study of preschool children in Stockholm.Children, Youth and Environments, 24 (3), 17–42.
39.
McKinneyM. (2006). Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization.Biological Conservation, 127, 247–260.
40.
McPhearsonT., KremerP., and HamsteadZ. (2013). Mapping ecosystem services in New York City: Applying a social-ecological approach in urban vacant land.Ecosystem Services, 5, 11–26.
41.
MEA (2005). Millennium Environmental Assessment.United Nations.
42.
MillerJ. R. (2005). Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience.Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20 (8), 430–434.
43.
MonroeM., and KrasnyM. (Eds.), (2013). Across the spectrum: Resources for environmental education (2013). North American Association for Environmental Education.
44.
Naturvårdsverket. (2013). Nyfiken på naturen: Varumärkeshandbok för oss som arbetar på naturum.Naturvårdsverket.
NordhH., HartigT., HagerhallC. M., and FryG. (2009). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration.Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8 (4), 225–235.
47.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
PauleyD. (1995). Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries.Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10 (10), 430.
49.
PriceC. J. (2010). Bioeconomic and biophilic intersect in nature centers: A case study of one nature center (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange.
50.
PyleR. M. (2002). Eden in a vacant lot: Special places, species, and kids in the neighborhood of life. In KahnP. H., KellertS. R. (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 305–327). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
51.
PyleR. M. (1993). Thunder tree: Lessons from an urban wildland.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
52.
RandA. (2010). Examining cognitive outcomes from exposure to interpretive material at the Harper's Ferry District in Grand Teton National Park. Unpublished Master of Science, University of Idaho.
53.
RoseG. (1993). Feminism and geography: The limits of geographical knowledge.Cambridge: Polity.
54.
SandbergE. (2014). Besökarnas tankar: Meningsskapande i naturum förstått genom listning av besökarnas tankar, No. 3/2014.Institution för stad och land.
SimmonsD. A. (1991). Are we meeting the goal of responsible environmental behavior? An examination of nature and environmental education center goals.Journal of Environmental Education, 22 (3), 16–21.
57.
Statistics Sweden. (2010). Tätorternas landareal, folkmängd och invånare per km2 2005 och 2010.
58.
StorksdieckM., PragoffD., and StreettK. (2003). Outdoor education for urban students: Using peer-teaching as a means to engage inner-city youth with nature.Proceedings from the NAAEE annual conference.Anchorage: Alaska.
59.
ThomashowM. (2002). Bringing the biosphere home: Learning to perceive global environmental change.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights No. ST/ESA/SER.A/352. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social AffairsPopulation Division.
