With the continued rise in screen media use and growing disconnect between youth and nature, the importance of community nature centers in providing natural experiences is increasingly recognized. Even so, many nature centers struggle to maintain public support and funds necessary for continued operations. One way for nature centers to engender public support and further their fundraising potential is through interpretive special events. This study seeks to understand whether (and how) interpretive outcomes of an interpretive special event relate to visitors’ intentions to return to a nature center in the future. The relationship between place attachment and intentions to return was also tested. Results show that affective interpretive outcomes, more than the program-specific outcomes or place attachment, had the strongest effects on intentions to return to the center. This finding was particularly true among new visitors to the nature center. Based on our findings, in addition to providing interpretive messages focused on specific resources, interpretive managers who are interested in increasing repeat visitation to their nature centers should consider placing an even higher priority on programs that create enjoyable and meaningful experiences for visitors.
AlexandrisK., KouthourisC., & MeligdisA. (2006). Increasing customers’ loyalty in a skiing resort: The contribution of place attachment and service quality.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18 (5), 414–425. doi: 10.1108/09596110610673547
2.
AlshemeiliA. (2014). The relationship between place attachment and return visits to heritage sites: A case study of Ras Al khaimah. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Edith Cowan UniversityPerth, Australia.
3.
AltmanI., & LowS. M. (1992). Place attachment (1st ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
4.
ANCA. (2005). About us: What is a nature or environmental learning center? Retrieved from http://natctr.org/about-us/
5.
BakerD. A., & CromptonJ. L. (2000). Quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions.Annals of Tourism Research, 27 (3), 785–804.
6.
BeaumontN. (2001). Ecotourism and the conservation ethic: Recruiting the uninitiated or preaching to the converted?Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 9 (4), 317–341. doi: 10.1080/09669580108667405
7.
BrochuL., & MerrimanT. (2008). Personal interpretation: Connecting your audience to heritage resources (2nd ed.). Fort Collins, CO: InterpPress.
8.
BrowningH. E. M. (2015). Nature centers in local communities: Perceived values, support factors, and visitation constraints. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg, VA.
9.
BurbachM. E., PennisiL., WestC. D., & Ziegler-ChongS. (2012). The impact of environmental interpretation in developing a connection to nature in park visitors.LARNet The Cyber Journal of Applied Leisure and Recreation Research, 15 (4), 13–30.
10.
CableT. T., & CaddenL. (2006). The common roots of environmental education and interpretation.Journal of Interpretation Research, 11 (2), 39–46.
11.
CableT. T., KnudsonD. M., UddE., & StewartD. K. (1987). Attitude change as a result of exposure to interpretive messages.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 5 (1), 47–60.
12.
ColeS. T., & ChancellorH. C. (2009). Examining the festival attributes that impact visitor experience, satisfaction and re-visit intention.Journal of Vacation Marketing, 15 (4), 323–333.
13.
CoyleK. (2005). Environmental literacy in America.The National Environmental Education & Training FoundationWashington, DC. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED522820.pdf
14.
De RojasC., & CamareroC. (2008). Visitors’ experience, mood and satisfaction in a heritage context: Evidence from an interpretation center.Tourism Management, 29 (3), 525–537. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.06.004
15.
GrappiS., & MontanariF. (2011). The role of social identification and hedonism in affecting tourist re-patronizing behaviours: The case of an Italian festival.Tourism Management, 32 (5), 1128–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.10.001
16.
GursoyD., SpangenbergE. R., & RutherfordD. G. (2006). The hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attendees’ attitudes toward festivals.Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 30 (3), 279–294.
17.
HairJ. F., TathamR. L., AndersonR. E., & BlackW. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. (5th edition). London: Prentice-Hall.
18.
HamS. H. (2013). Interpretation: Making a difference on purpose.Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
19.
HamS. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation: A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets.Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
20.
HwangS. N., LeeC., & ChenH. J. (2005). The relationship among tourists’ involvement, place attachment and interpretation satisfaction in Taiwan's national parks.Tourism Management, 26 (2), 143–156.
21.
KnappD. (2007). Applied interpretation: Putting research into practice (1st ed.). Fort Collins, CO: InterpPress.
22.
KnappD., & BarrieE. (2001). Content evaluation of an environmental science field trip.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10 (4), 351–357.
23.
KnappD., & BentonG. M. (2006). Episodic and semantic memories of a residential environmental education program.Environmental Education Research, 12 (2), 165–177. doi: 10.1080/13504620600688906
24.
KnudsonD. M., CableT. T., & BeckL. (2003). Interpretation of cultural and natural resources (2nd ed.). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
25.
KudryavtsevA., KrasnyM. E., & StedmanR. C. (2012). The impact of environmental education on sense of place among urban youth.Ecosphere, 3 (4), 1–15. doi: 10.1890/ES11-00318.1
26.
KyleG., GraefeA., ManningR., & BaconJ. (2003). An examination of the relationship between leisure activity and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail.Journal of Leisure Research, 35 (3), 249.
27.
LeeJ. S., LeeC. K., & ChoiY. (2011). Examining the role of emotional and functional values in festival evaluation.Journal of Travel Research, 50 (6), 685–696. doi: 10.1177/0047287510385465
28.
LeeT. H., & ShenY. L. (2013). The influence of leisure involvement and place attachment on destination loyalty: Evidence from recreationists walking their dogs in urban parks.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.11.002
29.
LeeJ., GraefeA. R., & BurnsR. C. (2007). Examining the antecedents of destination loyalty in a forest setting.Leisure Sciences, 29 (5), 463–481.
30.
LeeY. K., LeeC. K., LeeS. K., & BabinB. J. (2008). Festivalscapes and patrons’ emotions, satisfaction, and loyalty.Journal of Business Research, 61 (1), 56–64.
31.
LeeJ., & BeelerC. (2009). An investigation of predictors of satisfaction and future intention: links to motivation, involvement, and service quality in a local festival.Event Management, 13 (1), 17–29.
32.
LeopoldA. (1949). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches from Here and There.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
LouvR. (2005). Last child in the woods.Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
34.
MadinE. M. P., & FentonD. M. (2004). Environmental interpretation in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: An assessment of programme effectiveness.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 12 (2), 121–137. doi: 10.1080/09669580408667228
35.
McKercherB., & TseT. S. (2012). Is intention to return a valid proxy for actual repeat visitation?Journal of Travel Research, 51 (6), 671–686. doi: 10.1177/0047287512451140
36.
MooreR. L., & ScottD. (2003). Place attachment and context: Comparing a park and a trail within.Forest Science, 49 (6), 877–884.
37.
MooreR. L., & GraefeA. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users.Leisure Sciences, 16 (1), 17–31. doi: 10.1080/01490409409513214
38.
MorganM. (2009). Interpretation and place attachment: Implications for cognitive map theory.Journal of Interpretation Research, 14 (1), 47–59.
39.
MunroJ. K., Morrison-SaundersA., & HughesM. (2008). Environmental interpretation evaluation in natural areas.Journal of Ecotourism, 7 (1), 1–14. doi: 10.2167/joe137.0
40.
OramsM. B. (1997). The effectiveness of environmental education: can we turn tourists into “greenies’?Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3 (4), 295–306.
PergamsO. R. W., & ZaradicP. A. (2008). Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105 (7), 2295–2300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709893105
43.
PergamsO. R. W., & ZaradicP. A. (2006). Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices.Journal of Environmental Management, 80 (4), 387–393. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.001
44.
PowellR. B., & HamS. H. (2008). Can ecotourism interpretation really lead to pro-conservation knowledge, attitudes and behaviour? Evidence from the Galapagos islands.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16 (4), 467–489. doi: 10.2167/jost797.0
45.
PrayagG., & RyanC. (2012). Antecedents of tourists’ loyalty to Mauritius: The role and influence of destination image, place attachment, personal involvement, and satisfaction.Journal of Travel Research, 51 (3), 342–356. doi: 10.1177/0047287511410321
46.
PriceC. J. (2010). Bioeconomic and biophilic intersect in nature centers: A case study of one nature center. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of TennesseeKnoxville, TN.
47.
RamkissoonH., SmithL. D. G., & WeilerB. (2013). Relationships between place attachment, place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviour in an Australian national park.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21 (3), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2012.708042
SharpR. L., LarsonL. R., GreenG. T., & TomekS. (2012). Comparing interpretive methods targeting invasive species management at Cumberland Island National Seashore.Journal of Interpretation Research, 17 (2), 23–43.
51.
SimmonsD. A. (1991). Are we meeting the goal of responsible environmental behavior? An examination of nature and environmental education center goals.The Journal of Environmental Education, 22 (3), 16–21. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1991.10801963
52.
SkibinsJ. C., PowellR. B., & SternM. J. (2012). Exploring empirical support for interpretations’ best practices.Journal of Interpretation Research, 17 (1), 25–44.
53.
SternM. J., & PowellR. B. (2013). What leads to better visitor outcomes in live interpretation?Journal of Interpretation Research, 18 (2), 9–43.
54.
SternM. J., PowellR. B., MartinE., & McLeanK. (2012). Identifying best practices for live interpretive programs in the United States National Park Service. Retrieved from http://idp.eppley.org/news/clemson-vtech
55.
StewartE. J., HaywardB. M., DevlinP. J., & KirbyV. (1998). The “place” of interpretation: a new approach to the evaluation of interpretation.Tourism Management, 19 (3), 257–266. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00015-6
56.
TildenF. (1977). Interpreting our heritage (3rd ed.). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
57.
TuanY.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
58.
U.S. Census Bureau (2015). Annual Estimates of the resident population: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2015: 2015 population estimates.Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
59.
VaskeJ. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis in parks, recreation, and human dimensions.State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
60.
VaskeJ. J., & KobrinK. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior.The Journal of Environmental Education, 32 (4), 16–21.
61.
WagarJ. A. (1976). Evaluating the effectiveness of interpretation.Journal of Interpretation, 1 (1), 1–7.
62.
WardC. W., & WilkinsonA. E. (2006). Conducting meaningful interpretation: A field guide for success.Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
63.
Wickham, ThomasD., & Kerstetter, DeborahL. (2000). The relationship between place attachment and crowding in an event setting.Event Management, 6 (3), 167–174.
64.
WilliamsD. R., & VaskeJ. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach.Forest Science, 49 (6), 830–840.
65.
WilsonE. O. (1986). Biophilia.Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
WolfI. D., StrickerH. K., & HagenlohG. (2014). Outcome-focused national park experience management: transforming participants, promoting social well-being, and fostering place attachment.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23 (3), 358–381. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2014.959968
67.
YoonJ. I., & KyleG. (2009). Predictors of visitors’ intention to return to a nature-based recreation area.Proceedings of the 2009 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, 189–197.
68.
YoonY. S., LeeJ. S., & LeeC. K. (2010). Measuring festival quality and value affecting visitors’ satisfaction and loyalty using a structural approach.International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29 (2), 335–342.
