Naturalists act as a link between scientific knowledge and the public’s understanding of natural history and conservation efforts. For them to be successful, they need access to current content and resources. Incorporating tablet technology into naturalists’ endeavors can serve as an interpretation tool that facilitates participation and offers needed support to new/emerging naturalists. Our study, guided by an Attention Participation Framework, used a qualitative approach to explore the naturalists’ use of tablets during a technology-enhanced nature education program. We developed an app to support nature hikes for students led by naturalists-in-training (n = 72). We investigated how naturalists used tablet-based technology to support nature hike activities and their perspectives on technology as a tool for nature education. We found that naturalists relied on the app for reference throughout the hikes. Additionally, all of the naturalists held a positive perspective toward using tablets as an interpretive tool and recommended them for future use.
AbleK. W. (2016). Natural history: An approach whose time has come, passed, and needs to be resurrected. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal Du Conseil, 73(9), 2150–2155.
2.
AlonN. L.TalT. (2015). Teacher involvement in field trips and its impact on learning outcomes [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of NARST: A Worldwide Organization for Improving Science Teaching and Learning Through Research, Chicago, IL.
3.
AstinA. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.
4.
BoyceC. J.MishraC.HalversonK. L.ThomasA. K. (2014). Getting students OUTSIDE: using technology as a way to stimulate engagement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 815–826.
5.
BalmfordA.BeresfordJ.GreenJ.NaidooR.WalpoleM.ManicaA. (2009). A global perspective on trends in nature-based tourism. PLoS Biology, 7(6), e1000144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000144
6.
BarrowsC. W.Murphy-MariscalM. L.HernandezR. R. (2016). At a crossroads: The nature of natural history in the twenty-first century. Bioscience, 66(7), 592–599.
7.
BasuS. J.BartonA. C. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 466–489.
8.
BernackiM. L.GreeneJ. A.CromptonH. (2020). Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827
9.
BolligerD. U.ShepherdC. E. (2017). An investigation of mobile technologies and web 2.0 tools use in outdoor education programs. Journal of Outdoor Recreation Education and Leadership, 9(2), 181–196.
10.
BolligerD. U.ShepherdC. E. (2018). Instructor and adult learner perceptions of the use of Internet-enabled devices in residential outdoor education programs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 78–87.
11.
CloughG.JonesA. C.McAndrewP.ScanlonE. (2008). Informal learning with PDAs and smartphones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 359–371.
12.
CotičN.PlazarJ.Istenič StarčičA.ZuljanD. (2020). The effect of outdoor lessons in natural sciences on students’ knowledge, through tablets and experiential learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(5), 747–763. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.747
13.
DegnerM.MoserS.LewalterD. (2022). Digital media in institutional informal learning places: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100068
14.
DitzlerC.HongE.StrudlerN. (2016). How tablets are utilized in the classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 181–193.
15.
EntressC. (2023). The disappearance of natural history, fieldwork, and live organism study from american biology teacher education. Science Education, 32(6), 1739–1759.
16.
FailsJ. A.JonesM. (2020). The design of outdoor technologies for children. In McCrickardD. S.JonesM.StelterT. L. (Eds.), HCI outdoors: Theory, design, methods and applications. Human–Computer Interaction Series (pp. 213-227). Springer.
17.
FalloonG. (2013). Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning pathways. Computers & Education, 68, 505–521.
18.
FarnsworthE. J.ChuM.KressW. J.NeillA. K.BestJ. H.PickeringJ.StevensonR. D.CourtneyG. W.VanDykJ. K.EllisonA. M. (2013). Next-generation field guides. Bioscience, 63(11), 891–899.
19.
FutuymaD. J. (1998). Wherefore and whither the naturalist?The American Naturalist, 151(1), 1.
20.
GerberB. L.CavalloA. M. L.MarekE. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures, and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535–549.
HouH. T.WuS. Y.LinP. C.SungY. T.LinJ. W.ChangK. E. (2014). A blended mobile learning environment for museum learning. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 207–218.
23.
KennedyG. E.JuddT. S.ChurchwardA.GrayK.KrauseK. L. (2008). First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives?Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122.
24.
KiltyT. J.BurrowsA. C. (2020). Systematic review of outdoor science learning activities with the integration of mobile devices. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(2), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2020040103
25.
KrupaJ. J. (2000). The importance of naturalists as teachers & the use of natural history as a teaching tool. The American Biology Teacher, 62(8), 553–558.
26.
LandS. M.ZimmermanH. T. (2015). Socio-technical dimensions of an outdoor mobile learning environment: A three-phase design-based research investigation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9369-6
27.
LandS. M.ZimmermanH. T.MilletC.ChoiG. W. (2020). Supporting observing-on-the-move with proximity-based technology: Designing for children’s scientific observations outdoors. Visitor Studies, 23(2), 182–204.
28.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
29.
LeinM. R. (2005). Ernst Mayr as a life-long naturalist. Ornithological Monographs, 58, 17–29.
30.
LouvR. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin Books.
31.
MankinP. C.WarnerR. E.AndersonW. L. (1999). Wildlife and the Illinois public: a benchmark study of attitudes and perceptions. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27(2), 465–472.
32.
MarkiewiczJ.GoralnikL.O’ConnellK.Jr. (2023). Screens on trails: Digital environmental science, arts, and humanities learning for biocultural conservation. In RozziR.TauroA.Avriel-AvniN.WrightT.MayR. H. (Eds.), Field environmental philosophy ecology and ethics (Vol. 5, pp. 555–576). Springer.
33.
MayhewL. M.FinkelsteinN. D.HendersonC.SabellaM.HsuL. (2008). New media and models for engaging under-represented students in science. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1064, 155–158.
34.
McClainL. R. (2018). Parent roles and facilitation strategies as influenced by a mobile-based technology during a family nature hike. Visitor Studies, 21(2), 260–286.
35.
McClainL. R. (2022). Shaping families’ local biodiversity awareness while using a place-based mobile device during a nature walk. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 21(3), 273–287.
36.
McGlynnT. P. (2008). Natural History Education for students heading into the century of biology. The American Biology Teacher, 70(2), 109–111.
37.
MorimotoJ.PontonF. (2021). Virtual reality in biology: Could we become virtual naturalists?Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 14(1), 7.
38.
MooreA.DanielK. L.ThomasA. K. (2016). Engaging students in science through a nature hike: a sace of two students with ADHD. American Journal of Undergraduate Research, 13(2), 73–80.
39.
NangluK.de CarleD.CullenT. M.AndersonE. B.ArifS.CastañedaR. A.ChangL. M.IwamaR. E.FellinE.ManglicmotR. C.MasseyM. D.Astudillo-ClavijoV. (2023). The nature of science: The fundamental role of natural history in ecology, evolution, conservation, and education. Ecology and Evolution, 13(10), e10621.
40.
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). Next generation science standards. The National Academies Press. https://www.nextgenscience.org/
41.
NicholsJ. T. (1992). What is a naturalist, anyway?Natural History, 101(11), 8–12.
42.
NikolopoulouK. (2020). Secondary education teachers’ perceptions of mobile phone and tablet use in classrooms: Benefits, constraints and concerns. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00156-7
PaabyP.ClarkD. B.GonzálezH. (1991). Training rural residents as naturalist guides: Evaluation of a pilot project in Costa Rica. Conservation Biology: the Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 5(4), 542–546.
45.
PattonM. Q. (Ed.). (2002). Qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
46.
RoschelleJ. (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 260–272.
47.
RoschelleJ.PeaR. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1(1), 145–168.
48.
RuchterM.KlarB.GeigerW. (2010). Comparing the effects of mobile computers and traditional approaches in environmental education. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1054–1067.
49.
SaldañaJ. (Ed.). (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
50.
SchmidlyD. J. (2005). What it means to be a naturalist and the future of natural history at American Universities. Journal of Mammalogy, 86(3), 449–456.
51.
Sebastián-LópezM.DeMiguel GonzálezR. (2020). Mobile learning for sustainable development and environmental teacher education. Sustainability, 12(22), 9757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229757
52.
SheardJ. K.AdriaensT.BowlerD. E.BüermannA.CallaghanC. T.CamprasseE. C. M.ChowdhuryS.EngelT.FinchE. A.von GönnerJ.HsingP.-Y.MikulaP.Rachel OhR. Y.PetersB.PhartyalS. S.PocockM. J. O.WäldchenJ.BonnA. (2024). Emerging technologies in citizen science and potential for insect monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(1904), 20230106. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0106
53.
SilvaA. R.MatosS.GabrielR.Moura ArrozA.SousaD.PiasentinF.AmorimI. R. (2024). The field guide audio series: Mobile learning using place-based and inquiry-led approaches to promote adolescents’ interest in nature. Environmental Education Research, 30(6), 941–963.
54.
St. ClairA.HalversonK. L.ThomasA. K.BoyceC. J. (2015). Dividing attention participation to support informal learning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of NARST: A Worldwide Organization for Improving Science Teaching and Learning Through Research, Chicago, IL.
55.
TerrasM. M.RamsayJ. (2012). The five central psychological challenges facing effective mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 820–832.
56.
TewksburyJ. J.AndersonJ. G. T.BakkerJ. D.BilloT. J.DunwiddieP. W.GroomM. J.HamptonS. E.HermanS. G.LeveyD. J.MachnickiN. J.del RioC. M.PowerM. E.RowellK.SalomonA. K.StaceyL.TrombulakS. C.WheelerT. A. (2014). Natural history’s place in science and society. Bioscience, 64(4), 300–310.
ThomasA. K.HalversonK. L. (2012b). Creating OUTSIDE learning opportunities at the Lake Thoreau Environmental Center. Ecology, Evolution, and Environment (E3) Seminar, Hattiesburg, MS.
59.
ThompsonP. (2015). How digital native learners describe themselves. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 467–484.
60.
TréhinJ. R. (2023). Citizen science and mobile apps engaging the public in fish taxonomy. FishTaxa-Journal of Fish Taxonomy, 30(4), 14–26.
61.
VanKraalingenI. (2023). A systematized review of the use of mobile technology in outdoor learning. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 23(3), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2021.1984963
62.
VibergO.AnderssonA.WiklundM. (2021). Designing for sustainable mobile learning – Re-evaluating the concepts “formal” and “informal. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1548488
63.
WilcoveD.EisnerT. (2000). The impending extinction of natural history. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(3), B24.
64.
WoodruffA.AokiP. M.HurstA.SzymanskiM. H. (2001). Electronic guidebooks and visitor attention [Conference session]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cultural Heritage and Technologies in the Third Millennium.
65.
ZimmermanH. T.LandS. M. (2014). Facilitating place-based learning in outdoor informal environments with mobile computers. TechTrends, 58(1), 77–83.
66.
ZimmermanH. T.LandS. M.FaimonL.ChiuY. C. (2023). Mobile augmented reality supporting families’ immersive collaborative learning: Learning-on-the-move for place-based geoscience sense-making. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(2), 291–322.
67.
ZimmermanH. T.LandS. M.MaggioreC.MilletC. (2019). Supporting children’s outdoor science learning with mobile computers: integrating learning on-the-move strategies with context-sensitive computing. Learning Media & Technology, 44(4), 457–472.
