This study examines the relationship between voter ideology and the distribution of tax burdens across income groups using state and local data, aggregated at the state level, for 1995, 2002, and 2007. I find that average voter liberalism is positively related to subnational tax progressivity. However, the effects are economically insignificant. A state’s ethnic demographic context appears to be more important. The ethnic congruence between the poor and the nonpoor is positively related to progressivity and the effects are economically significant. The tension between ethnic groups, measured with an index of residential segregation, is inversely related to progressivity. The effects are larger in magnitude than those of average voter liberalism. It is possible that the ethnic demographic context reflects aspects of voter preferences that are not captured by measures of voter ideology.
AlesinaAlbertoFerraraEliana La. 2005. “Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities.”Journal of Public Economics89:897–931.
2.
AnselinLucKelejianHarry H.. 1997. “Testing for Spatial Error Autocorrelation in the Presence of Endogenous Regressors.”International Regional Science Review20:153–82.
3.
BaumChristopher F.SchafferMark E.StillmanSteven. 2007. “Enhanced Routines for Instrumental Variables/GMM Estimation and Testing.”Stata Journal7:465–506.
4.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-1993.”American Journal of Political Science42:327–48.
5.
BruecknerJan K.SaavedraLuz. 2001. “Do Local Governments Engage in Strategic Tax Competition?”National Tax Journal54:231–53.
6.
ChernickHoward. 1992. “A Model of the Distributional Incidence of State and Local Taxes. Public Finance Review20:572–85.
7.
ChernickHoward. 2005. “On the Determinants of State and Local Tax Progressivity in the U.S. National Tax Journal58:93–112.
8.
ChernickHoward. 2010. “Redistribution at the State and Local Level: Consequences for Economic Growth. Public Finance Review38:409–49.
9.
Citizens for Tax Justice. 1991. A Far Cry from Fair: CTJ’s Guide to State Tax Reform. Washington, DC: Citizens for Tax Justice.
10.
Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. 1996. Who Pays? A Distributional Analysis of the Tax Systems in All 50 states. Washington, DC: Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
11.
EdmistonKelly D.SpongKenneth. 2012. “Tax Incentives for Homeownership and the Provision of Local Public Services.”Public Finance Review40:116–44.
12.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FeldsteinMartin S.MetcalfGilbert E.. 1987. “The Effect of Federal Tax Deductibility on State and Local Taxes and Spending.”Journal of Political Economy95:710–36.
14.
FletcherJason M.MurrayMatthew N.. 2008. “What Factors Influence the Structure of the State Income Tax?”Public Finance Review36:475–96.
15.
FongChristina. 2001. “Social Preferences, Self-interest, and the Demand for Redistribution.”Journal of Public Economics82:225–46.
16.
FongChristinaLuttmerErzo F. P.. 2011. “Do Fairness and Race Matter in Generosity? Evidence from a Nationally Representative Charity Experiment. Journal of Public Economics95:372–94.
17.
GadeMary N.AdkinsLee C.. 1990. “Tax Exporting and State Revenue Structures.”National Tax Journal43:39–62.
18.
HeroRodney. 1998. Faces of Inequality: Social Diversity in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
HettichWalterWinerStanley. 1999. Democratic Choice and Taxation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HirschBarry T.MacphersonDavid A.VromanWayne G.. 2001. “Estimates of Union Density by State.”Monthly Labor Review124:51–55.
21.
Holbrook-ProvowThomas M.PoeStephen C.. 1987. “Measuring State Political Ideology.”American Politics Quarterly15:399–416.
22.
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. 2003. Who Pays? A Distributional Analysis of the Tax Systems in All 50 States. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
23.
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. 2009. Who Pays? A Distributional Analysis of the Tax Systems in All 50 States. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
24.
LuttmerErzo F. P.2001. “Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution.”Journal of Political Economy109:500–28.
25.
MetcalfGilbert. 1994. “The Lifetime Incidence of State and Local Taxes: Measuring Changes During the 1980’s.” In Tax Progressivity and Income Inequality, edited by SlemrodJoel, 59–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
MorganDavid R.1995. “Tax Equity in the American States: A Multivariate Analysis.”Social Science Quarterly75:510–23.
27.
PharesDonald. 1980. Who Pays State and Local Taxes?Oelgeschlager, UK: Gunn & Hain.
28.
RochChristine H.RushtonMichael. 2008. “Racial Context and Voting Over Taxes: Evidence from a Referendum in Alabama.”Public Finance Review36:614–34.
SchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidneyBradyHenry E. 1999. “Civic Participation and the Equality Problem.” In Civic Engagement in American Democracy, edited by SkocpolThedaFiorinaMorris P., 427–59. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
31.
StimsonJames A.1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
32.
StockJames H.YogoMotohiro. 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: A Festschrift in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, edited by AndrewsDonald W. K.StockJames H., 80–108. Cambridge University Press.
33.
TreschRichard W.2002. Public Finance: A Normative Theory. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.
