This article examines the effects of demographic change on federal, state, and local government expenditures in Germany to answer the question of whether demographic change will induce vertical fiscal expenditure imbalances. The authors present estimates of the impact of demographic change on public spending based on a decomposition of expenditures into twenty-nine categories (functions). Results suggest that demographic change will result in significant vertical expenditure imbalances between the federal and the subnational government sector as well as within the subnational government sector. In addition, the estimates show that the structure of expenditures by function has to be adjusted considerably to avoid deficits since demographically induced increases in expenditures in some important functions, such as pension payments, have to be counterbalanced by exploiting potential savings that arise from demographic change in other functions.
Bach, S., C. Bork, P. Krimmer, B. Raffelhüschen, and E. Schulzet.2002. Demographischer Wandel und Steueraufkommen. Report prepared for the Federal Ministry of Finance. DIW Materialien no. 20. Berlin, Germany: Federal Ministry of Finance.
2.
Börsch-Supan, A.1999. A model under siege: A case study of the German retirement insurance system. Economic Journal110 (461): F24-F45.
3.
Conference Board of Canada.2002. Fiscal prospects for the federal and provincial/territorial governments: Economic performance and trends. Ottawa, Canada: Conference Board of Canada.
4.
Dang, T.T., P. Antolin, and H. Oxley.2001. Fiscal implications of ageing: Projections of age-related spending. OECD Economic Department Working Paper no. 305 ECO/ WKP(2001)31. Paris: OECD.
5.
Echevarría, C.A.1995. On age distribution of population government expenditure and fiscal federalism. Journal of Population Economics8:301-13.
6.
Economic Policy Committee.2006. The impact of ageing on public expenditure: Projections for the EU 25 member states on pensions, health care, long-term care, education, and unemployment transfers (2004-2050). European Economy, Special Report no. 1/2006. Report prepared by the Ageing Working Group of the EPC and the European Commission's Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Brussels, Belgium: Economic Policy Committee.
7.
Federal Ministry of the Interior.2005. Dritter Versorgungsbericht der Bundesregierung. Berlin , Germany: Federal Ministry of the Interior.
8.
Federal Statistical Office of Germany.2003 . Population of Germany today and tomorrow. Wiesbaden, Germany: Federal Statistical Office of Germany .
9.
———. 2005. Offentliche Finanzen. Rechnungsergebnisse des öffentlichen Gesamthaushalts 2002. Fachserie 14, Reihe 3.1. Wiesbaden , Germany: Federal Statistical Office of Germany.
10.
———. n.d. Studierende an Hochschulen. Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.1. Various years . Wiesbaden, Germany: Federal Statistical Office of Germany.
11.
Franco, D., and T. Munzi.1997. Ageing and fiscal policies in the European Union. In The welfare state in Europe: Challenges and reforms. European Economy, Reports and Studies no. 4. Edited by European Commission's Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs : 239-388. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
12.
Gradstein, M., and M. Kaganovich.2004. Aging population and education finance . Journal of Public Economics88:2469-85.
13.
Grob, U., and S.C. Wolter.2005. Demographic change and public education spending— A conflict between young and old? Cesifo Working Paper no. 1555, October, CESifo-Group, Munich , Germany, www.cesifo-group.de.
14.
Gruber, J., and D. Wise.2001. An international perspective on policies for an aging society. NBER Working Paper 8103, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
15.
Hondroyiannis, G., and E. Papapetrou.2000. Do demographic changes affect fiscal developments?Public Finance Review28 (4): 468-88.
16.
Kempkes, G.2006. Demographic change and the allocation of public education resources: Evidence from East Germany. Manuscript, DresdenUniversity of Technology, Germany.
17.
Lazar, H., F. St-Hilaire, and J.-F. Tremblay.2003. Vertical fiscal imbalance: Myth or reality ? In Money, politics and health care. Reconstructing the federal-provincial partnership, ed. H. Lazar and F. St-Hilaire, 135-88. Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
18.
Lee, R., and R. Edwards.2001. The fiscal impact of population change . In Seismic shifts: The economic impact of demographic change , ed. Jane Sneddon Little and Robert K. Triest, 220-37. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series no. 46. Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
19.
Leibfritz, W., D. Roseveare, D. Fore, and E. Wurzel.1995. Ageing population, pension systems, and government budgets: How do they affect savings? OECD Economic Department Working Paper no. 156. Paris: OECD.
20.
Poterba, J.M.1997. Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management16:48-66.
21.
Ruggeri, G.C.2001. A federation out of balance. Ottawa , Canada: Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat .
22.
Seitz, H.2004. Die Auswirkungen des Bevölkerungsrückgangs auf die Finanzsituation des Freistaates Sachsen und seiner Kommunen. In Die demographische Herausforderung— Sachsens Zukunft gestalten, ed. G. Milbradt and J. Meier, 20-43. Gütersloh , Germany: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.
23.
Seitz, H., and B. Baum.2003. Demographie und öffentliche Bildungsausgaben in Deutschland: Eine empirische Untersuchung für die westdeutschen Flächenländer . Vierteljahreshefte für Wirtschaftsforschung2:205-19.
24.
Werding, M., and A. Kaltschütz.2005. Modellrechnungen zur langfristigen Tragfähigkeit der öffentlichen Finanzen. Ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung vol. 17. München, Germany: Ifo Institute for Economic Research.
