A conventional wisdom in personality and social psychology and organizational behavior is that personality matters most in weak situations and least in strong situations. The authors trace the origins of this claim and examine the evidence for the personality-dampening effect of strong situations. The authors identify the gap between claim and evidence and suggest an agenda for future research.
Adkins, C.L., & Naumann, S.E. (2001). Situational constraints on the achievement-performance relationship: A service sector study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 453-465.
2.
Alexander, C.N., Jr. , & Knight, G.W. (1971). Situated identities and social psychological experimentation. Sociometry, 34, 65-82.
3.
Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J.L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.
4.
Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York: Viking.
5.
Aryee, S., Chen, Z.X., & Budhwar, P.S. (2004). Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 94, 1-14.
6.
Bales, K., & Trodd, Z. (Eds.). (2008). To plead our own cause: Personal stories by today's slaves. Ithaca, NY: Cornell.
7.
Barker, J.R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managed teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408-437.
8.
Barker, J.R. (1999). The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.
10.
Beaty, J.C., Jr., Cleveland, J.N., & Murphy, K.R. (2001). The relation between personality and contextual performance in "strong" versus "weak" situations. Human Performance , 14, 125-148.
11.
Bowe, J. (2007). Nobodies: Modern American slave labor and the dark side of the new global economy. New York: Random House.
12.
Bowen, D.E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the "strength" of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203-221.
13.
Bowers, K.S. (1973). Situationism in psychology. Psychological Review, 80, 307-336.
14.
Bowles, H.R., Babcock, L., & McGinn, K.L. (2005). Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 951-965.
15.
Burger, J. (2007). Replicating Milgram. Association for Psychological Science Observer, 20, 15-17.
16.
Cantor, N., Mischel, W., & Schwartz, J.C. (1982). A prototype analysis of psychological situations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 45-77.
17.
Caspi, A., & Moffit, T.E. (1993). When do individual differences matter? A paradoxical theory of personality coherence. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 247-271.
18.
Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A.Y., & Bargh, J.A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173-187.
19.
Cialdini, R.B. (2008). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
Davis, M.S. (1971). That's interesting: Toward a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of Social Science, 1, 309-344.
21.
Davis-Blake, A., & Pfeffer, J. (1989). Just a mirage: The search for dispositional effects in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 385-400.
22.
Elms, A.C., & Milgram, S. (1966). Personality characteristics associated with obedience and defiance toward authoritative command. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1, 282-289.
23.
Endler, N.S., & Parker, J.D.A. (1992). Interactionism revisited: Reflections on the continuing crisis in the personality area. European Journal of Personality, 6, 177-198.
24.
Fleeson, W. (2001). Towards a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027.
25.
Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825-861.
26.
Funder, D.C., & Ozer, D.J. (1983). Behavior as a function of the situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 107-112.
27.
Gellatly, I.R. (1996). Conscientiousness and task performance: Test of a cognitive process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 474-482.
28.
Gellatly, I.R., & Irving, P.G. (2001). Personality, autonomy, and contextual performance of managers. Human Performance, 14, 231-245.
29.
George, J.M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524.
30.
Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown.
31.
Hanna, V., Backhouse, C.J., & Burns, N.D. (2004). Linking employee behavior to external customer satisfaction using quality function deployment. Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, 218, 1167-1177.
32.
Hollenbeck, J.R., Williams, C.R., & Klein, H.L. (1989). An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. Journal of Applied Psychology , 74, 18-23.
33.
Hough, L.M., & Schneider, R.J. (1996). Personality traits, taxonomies, and applications in organizations. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 31-88). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
House, R.J., & Baetz, M. (1979). Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and new research direction. Research in Organizational Behavior , 1, 341-423.
35.
Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Jarmusch, J. (Director). (2004). Coffee and cigarettes [Motion picture] . United States: MGM.
37.
John, O.P., & Robins, R.W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521-551.
38.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386-408.
39.
Johns, G., & Saks, A.L. (2001). Organizational behaviour: Understanding and managing life at work (5th ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
40.
Kärreman, D., & Alvesson, M. (2004). Cages in tandem: Management control, social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization , 11, 149-175.
41.
Kenrick, D.T., McCreath, H.E., Govern, J., King, R., & Bordin, J. (1990). Person-environment intersections: Everyday settings and common trait dimensions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 685-698.
42.
Konovsky, M.A., & Organ, D.W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 253-266.
43.
Marshall, M.A., & Brown, J.D. (2006). Trait aggressiveness and situational provocation: A test of the traits as situational sensitivities (TASS) model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1100-1113.
44.
McClelland, D., Atkinson, J.W., Clark, R.A., & Lowell, E.L. (1953). The achievement motive. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
45.
McShane, S.L. (2004). Canadian organizational behaviour (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
46.
Milgram, S. (Writer/Director). (1962). Obedience [Motion picture]. (Available from Penn State University Media Sales, 118 Wagner Building, University Park, PA 16802)
47.
Milgram, S. (1964). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row.
48.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: John Wiley.
49.
Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the cross-roads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1-22.
51.
Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E.B., & Zeiss, A.R. (1973). Selective attention to the self: Situational and dispositional determinants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 129-142.
52.
Monson, T.C., Hesley, J.W., & Chernick, L. (1982). Specifying when personality traits can and cannot predict behavior: An alternative to abandoning the attempt to predict single-act criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 285-399.
53.
O'Reilly, C.A., & Chatman, J.A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 157-200.
54.
Orne, M.T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783.
55.
Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
56.
Pran, D. (1997). Children of Cambodia's killing fields: Memoirs by survivors. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
Price, R.H., & Bouffard, D.L. (1974). Behavioral appropriateness and situational constraint as dimensions of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 579-586.
58.
Rachman, S.J. (1990). Fear and courage. New York : Freeman.
59.
Robie, C., Born, M.P., & Schmit, M.J. (2001). Personal and situational determinants of personality responses: A partial reanalysis and reinterpretation of the Schmit et al. 1995 data. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 101-117.
60.
Saffold, G.S., III. (1988). Culture traits, strength, and organizational performance: Moving beyond "strong" culture. Academy of Management Review, 13, 546-558.
61.
Schutte, N.S., Kenrick, D.T., & Sadalla, E.K. (1985). The search for predictable settings: Situational prototypes, constraint, and behavioral variation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 121-128.
62.
Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (2000). Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality , 14, 407-428.
63.
Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Wright, J.C. (1989). Intuitive interactionism in person perception: Effects of situation-behavior relations on dispositional judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 41-53.
64.
Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Wright, J.C. (1993a). Links between personality judgments and contextualized behavior patterns: Situation-behavior profiles of personality prototypes. Social Cognition, 11, 399-429.
65.
Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Wright, J.C. (1993b). The role of situational demands and cognitive competencies in behavior organization and personality coherence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1023-1035.
66.
Sørensen, J.B. (2002). The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 70-91.
67.
Tett, R.P., & Burnett, D.D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500-517.
68.
Tosi, H.L. (2002). Review of multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 368-370.
69.
Trimpop, R., & Kirkcaldy, B. (1997). Personality predictors of driving accidents. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 147-152.
70.
Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism . New York: Scribner.
71.
Weiss, H.M., & Adler, S. (1984). Personality and organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 26, pp. 1-50). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
72.
Wilder, B. (Director). (1959). Some like it hot [Motion picture] . United States: MGM.
73.
Withey, M.J., Gellatly, I.R., & Annett, M. (2005). The moderating effect of situational strength on the relationship between personality and provision of effort. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1587-1608.
74.
Wright, J.C., & Mischel, W. (1988). Conditional hedges and the intuitive psychology of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 454-469.
75.
Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer effect. New York : Random House.
