Label-Free Primary Screening and Affinity Ranking of Fragment Libraries Using Parallel Analysis of Protein Panels

Abstract

The authors present fragment screening data obtained using a label-free parallel analysis approach where the binding of fragment library compounds to 4 different target proteins can be screened simultaneously using surface plasmon resonance detection. They suggest this method as a first step in fragment screening to identify and select binders, reducing the demanding requirements on subsequent X-ray or nuclear magnetic resonance studies, and as a valuable “clean-up” tool to eliminate unwanted promiscuous binders from libraries. A small directed fragment library of known thrombin binders and a general 500-compound fragment library were used in this study. Thrombin, blocked thrombin, carbonic anhydrase, and glutathione-S-transferase were immobilized on the sensor chip surface, and the direct binding of the fragments was studied in real time. Only 12 µg of each protein is needed for screening of a 3000-compound fragment library. For screening, a binding site-blocked target as reference facilitates the identification of binding site-selective hits and the signals from other reference proteins for the elimination of false positives. The scope and limitations of this screening approach are discussed for both target-directed and general fragment libraries. (Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2008:202-209)

Keywords

label-free screening fragment library protein high-throughput screening

References

Oprea TI , Gottfries J. : Chemography: the art of navigating in chemical space. J Comb Chem 2001;3:157-166.

Linusson A. , Gottfries J. , Lindgren F. , Wold S. : Statistical molecular design of building blocks for combinatorial chemistry . J Med Chem 2000;43: 1320-1328.

Lipinski C. : Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability . J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2000;44:235-249.

Inglese J. , Auld DS , Jadhav A. , Johnson RL , Simenonov A. , Yasgar A. , et al: Quantitative high-throughput screening: a titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries . PNAS 2006;103:11473-11478.

Boehm H-J. , Boehringer M. , Bur D. , Gmuender H. , Huber W. , Klaus W. , et al: Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization: a promising alternative to random screening. J Med Chem 2000;43: 2664-2674.

Hajduk PJ , Greer J. : A decade of fragment-based drug design: strategic advances and lessons learned . Nat Rev Drug Discov 2007;5:211-219.

Linusson A. , Gottfries J. , Olsson T. , Örnskov E. , Folestad S. , Wold S. : Statistical molecular design, parallel synthesis and biological evaluation of a library of thrombine inhibitors. J Med Chem 2001;44:3424-3439.

Wold S. , Josefson M. , Gottfries J. , Linusson A. : The utility of multivariate design in PLS modelling. J Chemometrics 2004;18:156-165.

Rees DC , Congreve M. , Murray CW , Carr R. : Fragment-based lead discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004;3:660-672.

10.

Leach AR , Hann MM , Burrows JN , Griffin EJ : Fragment screening: an introduction. Mol Biosyst 2006;2:429-446.

11.

Hopkins AL , Groom CR , Alex A. : Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection. Drug Discov Today 2004;9:431-432.

12.

Abad-Zapatero C. , Metz JT : Ligand efficiency indices as guideposts for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2005 ;10:464-469.

13.

Huber W. , Mueller F. : Biomolecular interaction analysis in drug discovery using surface plasmon resonance technology. Curr Pharmaceut Design 2006;23:3999-4021.

14.

Huber W. : An improved strategy for secondary screening and lead optimization using high resolution SPR characterization of compound-target interactions . J Mol Recog 2005;18:273-281.