Despite the proliferation of literacy research suggesting that student-centered, culturally responsive instruction can improve literacy outcomes for racially and socioeconomically minoritized youth, one-size-fits-all literacy curricula and methods still dominate K-12 schools. This collective case study, which analyzes the figured worlds of two high school reading intervention classes through participant interviews and observations of two teachers and five of their students, offers a glimpse into this disparity. Findings indicate that the competing figured worlds of reading is a struggle and reading is a reward were both present in these classrooms, and that the prevailing frame of READING AS FAITH was a foundational theme across both sites. As such, the varying levels of faith in the power of reading, the curriculum, and the program among teachers and students contributed to course outcomes and students’ overall feelings toward reading. Implications for literacy research and practice are provided.
AkomA.ShahA.NakaiA.CruzT. (2016). Youth participatory action research (YPAR) 2.0: How technological innovation and digital organizing sparked a food revolution in east Oakland. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education: QSE, 29(10), 1287–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1201609
2.
AlthusserL. (1986). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In AdamsH.SearleL. (Eds.), Critical theory since 1965 (pp. 239–250). University of Florida Press.
3.
BachA. J.WolfsonT.CrowellJ. K. (2018). Poverty, literacy, and social transformation: An interdisciplinary exploration of the digital divide. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2018-10-1-2
4.
BialostokS. M. (2014). Metaphors that teachers live by: A cultural model of literacy in the era of new literacies. Language & Education: An International Journal, 28(6), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.905591
5.
BlackburnM. V. (2022). Moving across differences: How students engage LGBTQ+ themes in a high-school literature class. State University of New York Press.
6.
BoserU.WilhelmM.HannaR. (2014). The power of the Pygmalion effect: Teachers expectations strongly predict college completion (pp. 1–7). Center for American Progress.
7.
BrooksM. D.RodelaK. C. (2018). Why am I in Reading intervention? A dual analysis of entry and exit criteria. The High School Journal, 102(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2018.0020
8.
BrownellC. (2017). Mandated curricula as figured world: A case-study of identity, power, and writing in elementary English language arts. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 16(2), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-10-2016-0131
9.
CantrellS. C.PenningtonJ.RintamaaM.OsborneM.ParkerC.RuddM. (2017). Supplemental literacy instruction in high school: What students say matters for Reading engagement. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1081838
10.
CatalanoT. (2016). Talking about global migration: Implications for language teaching. Multilingual Matters.
11.
CatalanoT.WaughL. R. (2020). Critical discourse analysis, critical discourse studies and beyond (Vol. 26). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49379-0
12.
CherngH.-Y. S. (2017). If they think I can: Teacher bias and youth of color expectations and achievement. Social Science Research, 66, 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.04.001
13.
ColesJ. A. (2019). The black literacies of urban high school youth countering antiBlackness in the context of neoliberal multiculturalism. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 15(2), 1–35.
14.
CrainP. (2016). Reading children: Literacy, property, and the dilemmas of childhood in nineteenth-century America. University of Pennsylvania Press.
15.
de los RíosC. V. (2017). Picturing ethnic studies: Photovoice and youth literacies of social action. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 61(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.631
16.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
17.
FrankelK. K. (2016). The intersection of Reading and identity in high school literacy intervention classes. Research in the Teaching of English, 51(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201628684
18.
FrankelK. K. (2017). What does it mean to be a reader? Identity and positioning in two high school literacy intervention classes. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(6), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1250143
19.
FrankelK. K.BrooksM. D.LearnedJ. E. (2021). A meta-synthesis of qualitative research on Reading intervention classes in secondary schools. Teachers College Record, 123(8), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681211048624
20.
GabrielR. E. (2020). Converting to privatization: A discourse analysis of dyslexia policy narratives. American Educational Research Journal, 57(1), 305–338. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219861945
21.
GeeJ. P. (2014). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Routledge.
22.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.
23.
GinsbergR. (2020). Dueling narratives of a reader labeled as struggling: Positioning, emotion, and power within four differing English course contexts. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 25(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2019.1643245
24.
GraffH. J. (2017). Literacy myths, legacies, and lessons: New studies on literacy. Routledge.
25.
GrahamS.LiuX.AitkenA.NgC.BartlettB.HarrisK. R.HolzapfelJ. (2018). Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing Reading and writing instruction: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.194
26.
HaddixM. M. (2018). What’s radical about youth writing? Seeing and honoring youth writers and their literacies. Voices From the Middle, 25(3), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.58680/vm201829510
27.
HallL. A. (2010). The negative consequences of becoming a good reader: Identity theory as a lens for understanding struggling readers, teachers, and Reading instruction. Teachers College Record, 112(7), 1792–1829. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200708
28.
HarmonJ.WoodK.SmithK.ZakariaN.RamadanK.SykesM. (2016). Teaching and learning in high school Reading classes: Perspectives of teachers and students. Reading Psychology, 37(7), 962–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1157536
29.
Hendrix-SotoA. (2021). Activating joy and hope in critical literacies instruction: Responding pedagogically to youth skepticism in a YPAR project. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 70(1), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377211035819
30.
HollandD.LachicotteW.Jr.SkinnerD.CainC. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.
31.
HouchenD. (2013). “Stakes is high”: Culturally relevant practitioner inquiry with African American students struggling to pass secondary Reading exit exams. Urban Education, 48(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912456845
32.
ImperioA.Kleine StaarmanJ.BassoD. (2020). Relevance of the socio-cultural perspective in the discussion about critical thinking. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 15(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1970-2221/9882
33.
IvesD. (2011). Spotting foolbirds: Literacies hiding in plain sight in an urban English language arts classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(3), 250–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11413721
34.
KannoY.KangasS. E. N. (2014). “I’m not going to be, like, for the AP”: English language learners’ limited access to advanced college-preparatory courses in high school. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 848–878. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214544716
35.
KinlochV. (2017). “You ain’t making me write”: Culturally sustaining pedagogies and black youths’ performances of resistance. In ParisD.AlimH. S. (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 25–41). Teachers College Press.
36.
LearnedJ. E. (2016). “The behavior kids”: Examining the conflation of youth Reading difficulty and behavior problem positioning among school institutional contexts. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1271–1309. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216667545
37.
LearnedJ. E.FrankelK. K.BrooksM. D. (2022). Disrupting secondary Reading intervention: A review of qualitative research and a call to action. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 65(6), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1234
38.
LittlemoreJ. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge University Press.
39.
MaggioniL.FoxE.AlexanderP. A. (2014). Beliefs about Reading, text, and learning from text. In FivesH.GillM. G. (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 353–369). Routledge.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
42.
PringR. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy: A philosophical critique. In NorrisN. (Ed.), Curriculum and the teacher (pp. 36–42). Routledge.
43.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
44.
SarroubL. K.PernicekT. (2016). Boys, books, and boredom: A case of three high school boys and their encounters with literacy. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.859052
45.
ScribnerS. (1984). Literacy in three metaphors. American Journal of Education, 93(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/443783
46.
SkerrettA. (2012). We hatched in this class”: Repositioning of identity in and beyond a Reading classroom. The High School Journal, 95(3), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2012.0008
47.
StakeR. E. (2003). Case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 134–164). Sage.
48.
StreetB. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
49.
StuckeyE. (1991). The violence of literacy. Heinemann.
50.
TaylorC. S.NolenS. B. (2022). Culturally and socially responsible assessment: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
51.
van DijkT. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 62–86). Sage.
52.
WargoJ. M. (2017). “Every selfie tells a story…”: LGBTQ youth lifestreams and new media narratives as connective identity texts. New Media & Society, 19(4), 560–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815612447
53.
WissmanK.CostelloS.HamiltonD. (2012). “You’re like yourself”: Multimodal literacies in a Reading support class. Changing English, 19(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2012.704583
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
