AhrenTArlingerSHolmgrenSJerlvallLJohanssonBLindbladAPerssonLPettersonASjogrenH. (1977). Automatic Gain Control in Hearing Aids: The Influence of Different Attack and Release Times on Speech Intelligibility for Hearing Impaired with Recruitment (Report TA 84). Stockholm: Karolinska Institute.
2.
AllenJJengP. (1990). Loudness growth in 1/2 octave bands (LGOB): a procedure for the assessment of loudness. J Acoust Soc Amer88: 745–753.
3.
American National Standards Institute. (1987). Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics. ANSI S3.22–1987. American National Standards Institute, New York.
4.
American National Standards Institute. (1992). Testing Hearing Aids with a Broadband Noise Signal. ANSI S3.42–1992.
5.
BaechlerH. (1995). Unpublished data.
6.
BarfodJ. (1978). Multichannel compression hearing aids: Experiments and consideration on clinical applicability. Scand Audiol (suppl 6): 315–339.
7.
BlegvadB. (1974). Clinical evaluation of behind-the-ear hearing aids with compression amplification. Scand Audiol3: 57–60.
8.
BlesserB. (1969). Audio dynamic range compression for minimum perceived distortion. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoustics17: 78–84.
9.
BraidaLDurlachNLippmanRHicksBRabinowitzWReedC. (1979). Hearing aids—A review of past research on linear amplification, amplitude compression, and frequency lowering. ASHA Monograph No. 19, Rockville, MD.
BustamanteDBraidaL. (1987). Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners. J Rehab Res Dev24 (4): 149–160.
12.
CornelisseLGagneJSeewaldR. (1991). Ear level recordings of the long term average spectrum of speech. Ear Hear12: 47–54.
13.
CornelisseLSeewaldRJamiesonD. (1995). The input/output formula: A theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Amer97 (3): 1854–1864.
14.
DavisHStevensSNicholsRHudginsCPetersonGMarquisRRossD. (1947). Hearing Aids—An Experimental Study of Design Objectives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
DawsonPDillonHBattagliaJ. (1991). Output limiting compression for the severe-profoundly deaf. Austral J Audiol13 (1): 1–12.
16.
DillonH. (1988). Compression in hearing aids. In: SandlinR. (ed) Handbook of Hearing Aid Amplification, vol. I, Theoretical and Technical Considerations. College-Hill Press.
17.
DirksDMorganDDubnoJ. (1982). A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition. J Speech Hear Dis47: 114–123.
18.
DreschlerW. (1989). Phoneme perception via hearing aids with and without compression and the role of temporal resolution. Audiol28: 49–60.
19.
FabryD. (1991). Hearing aid compression. Amer J Audiol1 (1): 11–13.
20.
FestenJPlompR. (1983). Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Amer73: 652–662.
21.
HawkinsDNaidooS. (1993). Comparison of sound quality and clarity with asymmetrical peak clipping and output limiting compression. J Amer Acad Audiol4: 221–228.
HohmannVKollmeierB. (1995). The effect of multichannel dynamic compression on speech intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Amer97: 1191–1195.
24.
HorwitzATurnerCFabryD. (1991). Effects of different frequency response strategies upon recognition and preference for audible speech stimuli. J Speech Hear Res34: 1185–1196.
25.
HudginsCMarquisRNicholsRPetersonGRossD. (1948). The comparative performance of an experimental hearing aid and two commercial instruments. J Acoust Soc Amer20: 241–258.
26.
IHAFF, Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum. (1994). The unveiling of a comprehensive hearing aid fitting protocol for the 21st century. Presented at the Jackson Hole Rendezvous, Jackson Hole, WY.
27.
IngelstamRJohanssonBPettersonASjogrenH. (1971). The Effect of Non-Linear Amplitude Distortion, an Investigation by Variation of the Quadratic and Cubic Components. (Report TA 64). Stockholm: Karolinska Institute.
28.
JerlvallLLindbladA. (1978). The influence of attack and release time on speech intelligibility. A study of the effects of AGC on normal hearing and hearing impaired subjects. Scand Audiol (suppl 6): 341–353.
29.
JohanssonB. (1973). The hearing aid as a technical audiological problem. Scand Audiol (Suppl 3): 55–76.
30.
KillionM. (1994). Fig6.exe software: Hearing aid fitting targets for 40, 65 & 95 dB SPL inputs (version 1.01D). Etymotic Research, Elk Grove Village, IL.
31.
KillionM. (1995). Talking hair cells: what they have to say about hearing aids. In BerlinC. (ed) Hair Cells and Hearing Aids. Singular Press, San Diego.
32.
KingAMartinM. (1984). Is AGC beneficial in hearing aids?Bri J Audiol18: 31–38.
33.
KukF. (1994) Use of paired comparison in hearing aid fitting. In: ValenteM. (ed) Strategies for Selecting and Verifying Hearing Aid Fittings. Thieme Medical Publishers, NY, p. 108–135.
34.
KukFLauC. (1995). Criteria considerations in subjective rating tasks. Paper presented at Third International Hearing Aid Conference in Iowa City, IA, 1995.
35.
LevittH. (1993). Future directions in hearing aid research. J Speech-Lang Path & Audiol1: 107–124.
36.
LynnGCarhartR. (1963). Influence of attack and release in compression amplification on understanding of speech by hypoacusics. J Speech Hear Dis28: 124–140.
37.
MacraeJ. (1994). Prediction of asymptotic threshold shift caused by hearing aid use. J Speech Hear Res37: 1450–1458.
38.
MontgomeryAEdgeR. (1988). Evaluation of two speech enhancement techniques to improve intelligibility for hearing impaired adults. J Speech Hear Res31: 386–393.
39.
MooreB. (1986). Frequency Selectivity in Hearing. London: Academy Press.
40.
MooreB. (1990). How much do we gain by gain control in hearing aids?Acta Otolaryng (supp 469): 250–256.
41.
MooreB. (1991). Characterization and simulation of impaired hearing: Implications for hearing aid design. Ear Hear12: 154S–161S.
42.
MooreBLaurenceRWrightD. (1985). Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids. Bri J Audiol19: 175–187.
43.
MooreBGlasbergB. (1988). A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids. Bri J Audiol22: 93–104.
44.
MooreBGlasbergBStoneM. (1991). Optimization of a slow-acting automatic gain control system for use in hearing aids. Bri J Audiol25: 171–182.
45.
MooreBJohnsonJClarkTPluvinageV. (1992). Evaluation of a dual channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear13: 349–370.
46.
NabelekI. (1983). Performance of hearing-impaired listeners under various types of amplitude compression. J Acoust Soc Amer74: 776–791.
47.
NeumanABakkeMHellmanSLevittH. (1994). Effect of compression ratio in a slow-acting compression hearing aid: paired comparison judgments of quality. J Acoust Soc Amer96 (3): 1471–1478.
48.
NortonS. (1992). Cochlear function and otoacoustic emissions. Seminars in Hearing13: 1–14.
49.
PearsonsKBennettRFidellS. (1977). Speech Levels in Various Noise Environments. EPA report 600/1–77–025. Washington, D.C.
50.
PetersonMFeeneyPYantisP. (1990). The effect of automatic gain control in hearing-impaired listeners with different dynamic ranges. Ear Hear11: 185–194.
51.
PlompR. (1988). The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. J Acoust Soc Amer83: 2322–2327.
PrevesD. (1991). Output limiting and speech enhancement. In: StudebakerGBessFBeckL. (eds), The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report II. Parton, MD: York Press, 35–51.
54.
PrevesDBeckLBurnettETederH. (1989). Input stimuli for obtaining frequency responses of automatic gain control hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res32: 189–194.
55.
SammethCOchsM. (1991). A review of current “noise reduction” hearing aids: A rationale, assumptions, and efficacy. Ear Hear12: 116S–124S.
56.
SchweitzerHCauseyG. (1977). The relative importance of recovery time in compression hearing aids. Audiol16: 61–72.
57.
StoneMMooreB., (1992). Syllabic compression: effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates. Bri J Audiol26: 351–161.
58.
SungRSungG. (1982). Compression amplification: its effect on speech intelligibility in noise. Hear Aid J35 (11): 20–24.
59.
TylerRKukF. (1989). The effects of “noise suppression” hearing aids on consonant recognition in speech babble and low frequency noise. Ear Hear10 (4): 243–249.
60.
Van TasellD. (1993). Hearing loss, speech, and hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res36: 228–244.
61.
ViemeisterN. (1979). Temporal modulation transfer function based on modulation thresholds. J Acoust Soc Amer66: 1364–1380.
62.
WalkerGDillonH. (1982). Compression in Hearing Aids: An Analysis, a Review, and Some Recommendations (report No. 90). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
63.
YundEBucklesK. (1995a). Multichannel compression hearing aids: Effect of number of channels on speech discrimination in noise. J Acoust Soc Amer97: 1206–1223.
64.
YundEBucklesK. (1995b). Enhanced speech perception at low signal-to-noise ratios with multichannel compression hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Amer97: 1224–1240.
65.
YundEBucklesK. (1995c). Discrimination of multichannel-compressed speech in noise: long term learning in hearing impaired subjects. Ear Hear16: 417–427.