Given the central importance of news media in providing the public with information about court decisions,this study examines variations in local and national media coverage of the Supreme Court decision on a Texas antisodomy law known as Lawrence v. Texas.The authors use content analysis of newspaper articles to test hypotheses concerning how media coverage of the case might vary by media outlet. The authors assess bias by examining overall coverage and the tone of coverage.The analysis suggests that media outlets varied in their coverage of the case,with states that had existing sodomy laws providing more coverage,and that some outlets tended to be more biased in their tone than others. The analysis confirms the importance of local relevance,but the authors also find that media outlet size and political context may play a role in determining coverage of an issue.
Ayres,Susan.1998.“Coming Out:Decision-Making in State and Federal Sodomy Cases.” Albany Law Review62(2):355–379.
2.
Baumgartner,Frank R.,and Bryan D.Jones.1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones, eds. 2002. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Bowers v.Hardwick. 1986. 478 U.S. 186.
5.
Button, J. W., B. A. Rienzo, and K. D. Wald. 1997. Private Lives,Public Conflicts:Battles over Gay Rights in American Communities. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
6.
Caldeira,Gregory A.1986.“Neither the Purse Nor the Sword:Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review80(December):1209–1226.
7.
Caldeira, Gregory A., and James L. Gibson. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science36(August):635–664.
8.
Clawson,Rosalee A.,and Eric N.Waltenberg.2003.“Support for a Supreme Court Affirmative Action Decision: A Story in Black and White.” American Politics Research31(3):251–279.
9.
Davis, R.1994. Decisions and Images: The Supreme Court and the Press. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Davis,R.,and V.J.Strickler.2000.“The Invisible Dance:The Supreme Court and the Press.” Perspectives on Political Science29(9):85–92.
11.
D’Emilio, John.1998. Sexual Politics Sexual Communities. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Franklin,Charles H.,and Liane C.Kosaki.1989.“Republican Schoolmaster:The U.S.Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review83(3):751–771.
13.
Franklin, C. H., and L. C. Kosaki. 1995. “Media Knowledge and Public Evaluations of the Supreme Court.” In Contemplating Courts, ed. Lee Epstein, 352–375.Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
14.
Gartner, Scott Sigmund. 2004. “Making the International Local: The Terrorist Attack on The USS Cole, Local Casualties, and Media Coverage.” Political Communication21(2):139-159.
15.
Gearan,Anne.2003.“Supreme Court's Day:Gay Rights Cases Up.”Kansas City Star,May1:A5.
16.
Glick, Henry R., and Amy Hutchinson. 2001. “Physician-Assisted Suicide: Agenda Setting and the Elements of Morality Policy.” In The Public Clash of Private Values,ed.Christopher Z.Mooney. New York: Chatham House.
17.
Haider-Markel, Donald P.2000. “Lesbian and Gay Politics in the States: Interest Groups, Electoral Politics, and Public Policy.” In The Politics of Gay Rights, ed. Craig A. Rimmerman, Kenneth D. Wald, and Clyde Wilcox. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Haider-Markel,Donald P.2004. Media Coverage of Lawrence v.Texas:An Analysis of Content,Tone,and Frames in National and Local News Reporting.New York:GLAAD Center for the Study of Media and Society.
19.
Haider-Markel,Donald P.,and Kenneth J.Meier.1996.“The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict.”Journal of Politics58(2):332–349.
20.
Haltom, W.1998. Reporting on the Courts: How the Mass Media Cover Judicial Actions. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
21.
Hoekstra,Valerie J.2000.“The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.”American Political Science Review94(March):89–108.
22.
Hoekstra,Valerie J.2003. Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
23.
Hoekstra,Valerie J.,and Jeffrey A.Segal.1996.“The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion:The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel.”Journal of Politics58(November):1079–1102.
24.
Iyengar,Shanto.1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
25.
Jeon,Yongjoo,and Donald P.Haider-Markel.2001.“Tracing Issue Definition and Policy Change: An Analysis of Disability Issue Images and Policy Response.”Policy Studies Journal29(2):215–231.
26.
Jones, Clifford A.2003. “Voting from the Bench: Media Analysis of Legal Issues in the 2000 Postelection Campaign.”American Behavioral Scientist46(5):642–657.
27.
Joslyn, Mark R., and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2000. “Guns in the Ballot Box: Information, Groups, and Opinion in Ballot Initiative Campaigns.”American Politics Quarterly28(3):355–378.
28.
Kalwinsky, Robert K.1998. “Framing Life and Death: Physician-Assisted Suicide and the New York Times from 1991 to 1996.”Journal of Communication Inquiry22(1):93–112.
29.
Keen,Lisa.2001.“By the Books:D.C.Ranks Second in Survey of States Treatment of Gays.”The Washington Blade,Nov.9.
30.
Lawrence v.Texas. 2003. 539 U.S. 558. No. 02-102 (U.S.).
31.
Leighley,Jan E.2004.Mass Media and Politics:ASocial Science Perspective.Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
32.
Lewis,Gregory B.,and Jonathan L.Edelson.2000.“DOMA and ENDA:Congress Votes on Gay Rights.” In The Politics of Gay Rights, ed. Kenneth D. Wald, Craig A. Rimmerman, and Clyde Wilcox, 193–216. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Morris, Juli A.1991.“Challenging Sodomy Statutes: State Constitutional Protection for Sexual Privacy.”Indiana Law Journal, spring:609–624.
34.
Nice, David C.1988. “State Deregulation of Intimate Behavior.”Social Science Quarterly69(2):203–211.
35.
Pinello, Daniel R.2003. Gay Rights and American Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Samar,Vincent J.1991. The Right to Privacy:Gays,Lesbians,and the Constitution.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
37.
Shah,Dhavan V.,Mark D.Watts,David Domke,David P.Fan,and Michael Fibison.1999.“News Coverage, Economic Cue's and the Public's Presidential Preferences, 1984-1996.”Journal of Politics61(4):914–943.
38.
Slotnick,E.E.,and J.A.Segal.1998.Television News and the Supreme Court:All the News That's Fit to Air?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Smith, Raymond A., and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2002. Gay and Lesbian Americans and Political Participation. Denver, CO: ABC-CLIO.
40.
Witt, Stephanie L., and Suzanne Mc Corkle, eds. 1997. Anti-Gay Rights:Assessing Voter Initiatives. Westport, CT: Praeger.
41.
Wlezien, Christopher B., and Malcolm L. Goggin. 1993. “The Courts, Interest Groups, and Public Opinion about Abortion.”Political Behavior15(4):381–405.
42.
Woolley,John T.2000.“Using Media-Based Data in Studies of Politics.”American Journal of Political Science44(1):156–173.
