This study discusses variations in the media coverage of the most prominent male and female EP candidates from Romania in the four weeks leading up to Election Day (May 8 to June 7, 2009). The verbal- and visual-framing analyses conducted focus on the visibility of these candidates, their viability (horse-race frame), and the balance between issue-related coverage (issue frame) and gendered coverage (trivialization frame). Our sample encompasses 249 news stories from the web sites of the most influential broadsheets and tabloids in Romania, namely, Cancan, Evenimentul Zilei, Gândul, and Libertatea. The results point toward a gender bias on the part of media. Whereas women dominated the tabloid outlets, men were featured prominently in the broadsheets. The trivialization and the issue frames appeared more often for female candidates, whereas the results for the horse-race frame were mixed. While factors other than gender (such as experience) might have influenced the coverage of these particular candidates, it is still too early to proclaim equal treatment in the media, especially since women were considered unable to deal with the issues they were linked to.
AdayS.DevittJ.2001. “Style over Substance: Newspaper Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Presidential Bid.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics6 (2): 52–73.
2.
AshmoreR.del BocaF.1979. “Sex Stereotypes and Implicit Personality Theory: Toward a Cognitive-Social Psychological Conceptualization.” Sex Roles5:219–48.
3.
AtkesonL. R.KrebsT. B.2008. “Press Coverage of Mayoral Candidates: The Role of Gender in News Reporting and Campaign Issue Speech.” Political Research Quarterly61 (2): 239–52.
4.
BăbanA.2000. “Women’s Sexuality and Reproductive Behavior in Post-Ceauşescu Romania: A Psychological Approach.” In Reproducing Gender: Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life after Socialism, ed. GalS.KligmanG., 225–252. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
5.
BanwartM. C.BystromD. G.RobertsonT.2003. “From the Primary to the General Election: A Comparative Analysis of Candidate Media Coverage in Mixed-Gender 2000 Races for Governor and U.S. Senate.” American Behavioral Scientist46 (5): 658–76.
6.
BarrettA. W.BarringtonL. W.2005a. “Bias in Newspaper Photograph Selection.” Political Research Quarterly58 (4): 609–18.
7.
BarrettA. W.BarringtonL. W.2005b. “Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Newspaper Photographs and Voter Evaluations of Political Candidates.” The International Journal of Press/Politics10 (4): 98–113.
8.
BartelsL. M.1993. “Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.” American Political Science Review87:267–85.
9.
BoomgaardenH. G.SemetkoH. A.2007. “Duell Mann gegen Frau?! Geschlechterrollen und Kanzlerkandidaten in der Wahlkampfberichterstattung” [A Battle between a Man and a Woman? Gender Roles and Candidates for Chancellor in the Election Campaign Coverage]. In Die Bundestagswahl 2005. Analysen des Wahlkampfes und der Wahlergebnisse, ed. BrettschneiderF.NiedermayerO.WeßelsB., 171–96. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
10.
BradenM.1996. Women Politicians and the Media. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
11.
BystromD. G.1999. “Why Not a Woman? Reactions to the Presidential Candidacy of Elizabeth Dole.” Paper presented at the National Communication Association convention, Chicago.
12.
BystromD. G.2006. “Advertising, Web Sites, and Media Coverage: Gender and Communication along the Campaign Trail.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, ed. CarrollS. J.FoxR. L., 169–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BystromD. G.RobertsonT. A.BanwartM. A.2001. “Framing the Fight: An Analysis of Media Coverage of Female and Male Candidates in Primary Races for Governor and U.S. Senate in 2000.” American Behavioral Scientist44 (12): 1999–2013.
14.
CallaghanK.2005. “Conclusion: Controversies and New Directions in Framing Research.” In Framing American Politics. ed. CallaghanK.SchnellF., 179–90. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
15.
CappellaJ. N.JamiesonK. H.1997. “Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good.” New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
CarlinD. B.WinfreyK. L.2009. “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage.” Communication Studies60 (4): 326–43.
17.
CohenC. E.1981. “Goals and Schemata in Person Perception: Making Sense from the Stream of Behavior.”InPersonality, Cognition, and Social Interaction, ed. CantorN.KihlstromJ. F., 45–68. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
ColemanR.2010. “Framing the Pictures in Our Heads. Exploring the Framing and Agenda-Setting Effects of Visual Images.” In Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, ed. D’AngeloP.KuypersJ. A., 233–61. New York: Routledge.
19.
CowleyP.ChildsS.2003. “Too Spineless to Rebel? New Labour’s Women MPs.” British Journal of Political Science33 (3): 345–65.
20.
DanV.IhlenØ. 2011. “Towards the Empirical Assessment of Complex Frames: A Method for Combining Analysis of Verbal and Visual Elements.” Paper presented at the 61st Annual Conference of the International Communication AssociationBoston.
21.
DavisJ.1982. “Sexist Bias in Eight Newspapers.” Journalism Quarterly59:456–60.
22.
DevineP.MonteithM. J.1999. “Automaticity and Control in Stereotyping.” In Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, ed. ChaikenS.TropeY., 339–60. New York: The Guilford Press.
23.
DevittJ.2002. “Framing Gender on the Campaign Trail: Female Gubernatorial Candidates and the Press.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly79 (2): 445–63.
24.
EdwardsJ. L.McDonaldC. A.2010. “Reading Hillary and Sarah: Contradictions of Feminism and Representation in 2008 Campaign Political Cartoons.” American Behavioral Scientist54 (3): 313–29.
25.
EntmanR. M.1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication43 (4): 51–8.
26.
FalkE.2008. “Women for President: Media Bias in Eight Campaigns.” Champaign: University of Illinois.
27.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E.1991. Social Cognition. 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
FoxR. L.1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
29.
GamsonW. A.1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
GamsonW. A.LaschK. E.1983. “The Political Culture of Social Welfare Policy.” In Evaluating the Welfare State. Social and Political Perspectives, ed. SpiroS. E.Yuchtman-YaarE., 397–415. New York: Academic Press.
31.
GamsonW. A.ModiglianiA.1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power. A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology95:1–37.
32.
GidengilE.EverettJ.2000. “Filtering the Female: Television News Coverage of the 1993 Canadian Leaders’ Debates.” Women & Politics20 (4): 105–31.
33.
GidengilE.EverittJ.2003. “Talking Tough: Gender and Reported Speech in Campaign News Coverage.” Political Communication20 (3): 209.
34.
GilliamF. D.IyengarS.2000. “Prime Suspects: The Influence of Local Television News on the Viewing Public.” American Journal of Political Science44:560–73.
GraberD. A.1987. “Kind Pictures and Harsh Words: How Television Presents the Candidates.” In Elections in America, ed. SchlozmanK. L., 115–41. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
38.
GraberD. A.1988. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. 2nd ed.New York: Longman.
39.
HeithD. J.2001. “Footwear, Lipstick, and an Orthodox Sabbath: Media Coverage of Nontraditional Candidates.” White House Studies1:335–47.
40.
HeldmanC.CarrollS. J.OlsonS.2005. “‘She Brought Only a Skirt’: Print Media Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Bid for the Republican Presidential Nomination.” Political Communication22:315–35.
41.
HuddyL.TerkildsenN.1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science37 (1): 119–47.
42.
IbroschevaE.Raicheva-StoverM.2009. “Engendering Transition: Portrayals of Female Politicians in the Bulgarian Press.” Howard Journal of Communications20 (2): 111–28.
43.
IyengarS.KinderD. R.1987. News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
JamiesonK. H.1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
JamiesonK. H.1995. Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
JolliffeL. B.1989. “Comparing Gender Differentiation in the New York ‘Times,’ 1885 and 1985.” Journalism Quarterly66 (3): 683–91.
47.
KahnK. F.1994a. “Does Gender Make a Difference? An Experimental Examination of Sex Stereotypes and Press Patterns in Statewide Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science38 (1): 162–95.
48.
KahnK. F.1994b. “The Distorted Mirror: Press Coverage of Women Candidates for Statewide Office.” The Journal of Politics56 (01): 154–73.
49.
KahnK. F.GoldenbergE. N.1991. “Women Candidates in the News: An Examination of Gender Differences in U.S. Senate Campaign Coverage.” Public Opinion Quarterly55 (2): 180–99.
50.
KahnK. F.GordonA.1997. “How Women Campaign for the US Senate: Substance and Strategy.” In Women, Media and Politics, ed. NorrisP., 59–76. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
KerbelM. R.1997. “The Media: Viewing the Campaign through a Strategic Haze.” In The Elections of 1996, ed. Nelson,81-105M.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
52.
LindR. A.SaloC.2002. “The Framing of Feminists and Feminism in News and Public Affairs Programs in U.S. Electronic Media.” The Journal of Communication52 (1): 211–28.
53.
MaierM.TenscherJ. eds. 2006. Campaigning in Europe-Campaigning for Europe. Political Parties, Campaigns, Mass Media and the European Parliament Elections 2004. Berlin, Germany: Lit Publishers.
54.
MajorL. H.ColemanR.2008. “The Intersection of Race and Gender in Election Coverage: What Happens When the Candidates Don’t Fit the Stereotypes?” Howard Journal of Communications19 (4): 315–33.
55.
MarkusG. B.1982. “Political Attitudes during an Election Year: A Report of the 1980 NES Panel Study.” American Political Science Review75:538–60.
56.
MessarisP.AbrahamL.2001. “The Role of Images in Framing News Stories.” In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, ed. ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E., 215–26. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
NewtonJ. H.WilliamsR.2011. “Transcending Stereotypes of Feminine and Masculine in the Theatre of Mediatypes.” In Images that Injure: Pictorial Stereotypes in the Media, ed. RossS. D.LesterP. M., 197–210. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
58.
PalvioA.1991. Images in Mind: The Evolution of a Theory. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
59.
PanZ.KosickiG.1993. “Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse.” Political Communication10 (1): 55–75.
60.
PattersonT. E.1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage.
61.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. BerkowitzL., 123–205. New York: Academic Press.
62.
ReynoldsA.BarnettB.2003. “‘America under Attack’: CNN’s Verbal and Visual Framing of September 11.” In Media Representations of September 11, ed. ChermakS. M.BaileyF. Y.BrownM., 85–102. Greenwood Publishing Group.
63.
Romanian Ministry of Labour. n.d. “Analiză privind gradul de participare a femeilor şi bărbaţilor în procesul decizional de la nivelul administraţiei publice centrale şi locale” [Analysis on the Participation of Women and Men in Decision-Making at Local and National Level]. http://www.mmuncii.ro/pub/imagemanager/images/file/Domenii/Egalitate%20de%20sanse/PARTIC1.pdf (accessed December 18, 2012)
64.
RosenbergS. W.BohanL.McCaffertyP.HarrisK.1986. “The Image and the Vote: The Effect of Candidate Presentation on Voter Preference.” American Journal of Political Science30 (1): 108–27.
65.
RosenwasserS. M.RogersR.FlingS.Silvers-PickensK.ButemeyerJ.1987. “Attitudes toward Women and Men in Politics: Perceived Male and Female Candidate Competencies and Participant Personality Characteristics.” Political Psychology8:191–200.
RossK.ComrieM.2012. “The Rules of the (Leadership)Game: Gender, Politics and News.”Journalism13 (8): 969–84.
68.
SapiroV.1982. “If U.S. Senator Baker Were a Woman: An experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology2:61–83.
69.
SemetkoH. A.BoomgaardenH. G.2007. “Reporting Germany’s 2005 Bundestag Election Campaign: Was Gender an Issue?” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12 (4): 154–71.
70.
SemetkoH. A.ValkenburgP. M.2000. “Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News.” Journal of Communication50 (2): 93–109.
71.
SiuneK.1983. “The Campaigns on Television: What Was Said and Who Said It.” In Communicating to Voters: Television in the First European Parliamentary Elections, ed. BlumlerJ. G., 223–40. London: Sage.
72.
SmithK. B.1997. “When All’s Fair: Signs of Parity in Media Coverage of Female Candidates.” Political Communication14 (1): 71–82. doi:10.1080/105846097199542.
73.
SnowD. A.BenfordR. D.1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance and Participant Mobilization.” In From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movements Research across Cultures, ed. KlandermansB.KriesiH.TarrowS., 137–96. Greenwich: JAI Press.
74.
StevensA.2007. Women, Power and Politics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
75.
TankardJ. W.2001. “The Empirical Approach to the Study of Media Framing.” In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, ed. ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA., 95–106. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76.
TrimbleL.TreibergN.2010. “‘Either Way, There’s Going to Be a Man in Charge’: Media Representations of New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark.” In Cracking the Highest Glass Ceiling: A Global Comparison of Women’s Campaigns for Executive Office, ed. MurrayR.,116-136. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
77.
TuchmanG.1978. “Introduction: The Symbolic Annihilation of Women by the Mass Media.” Hearth and Home: In Images of Women in the Mass Media, ed. TuchmanG.DanielsA. K.Benet,3-29J.New York: Oxford University Press.
78.
TurkJ. V.1987. “Sex-Role Stereotyping in Writing the News: Another Look at the Influence of Reporter and Source Gender.” Journalism Quarterly64 (2): 613–7.
79.
ValenzuelaS.CorreaT.2009. “Press Coverage and Public Opinion On Women Candidates.” International Communication Gazette71 (3): 203–23.
80.
Van GorpB.2007. “The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In.” Journal of Communication57 (1): 60–78.
81.
WantaW.1988. “The Effects of Dominant Photographs: An Agenda-Setting Experiment.” Journalism Quarterly65 (1): 107–11.
82.
WilkeJ.ReinemannC.2007. “Invisible Second-Order Campaigns? A Longitudinal Study of the Coverage of the European Parliamentary Elections 1979-2004 in Four German Quality Newspapers.” Communications32:299–322.
83.
WilsonM. C.2004. “Closing the Leadership Gap: Why Women Can and Must Help Run the World.” New York: Viking.
84.
WittL.PagetK. M.MatthewsG.1994. Running as a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics. New York: The Free Press.
85.
WoodcockS.2007. “Romanian Women’s Discourses of Sexual Violence: Othered Ethnicities, Gendering Spaces.” In Living Gender after Communism, ed. JohnsonJ. E.RobinsonJ. C., 149–68. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
