Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

While current federal programs for broadband have invested heavily in rural infrastructure, significant disparities in Internet use remain in urban areas, where broadband networks are available. The success of the national broadband plan and federal policy require understanding barriers to Internet adoption, including persistent inequalities in urban areas. Analysis of a random sample telephone survey in the city of Chicago merged with census tract–level data finds that neighborhood-level factors such as segregation and concentrated poverty influence the reasons why residents do not have home Internet access, as well as individual-level factors. Interactions demonstrate differential effects of age across racial and ethnic groups, and the amplification of disparities in access in segregated neighborhoods, especially for Latinos in gateway immigrant neighborhoods. Place effects need to be taken into account in further research and theory on technology inequality, and in public policy as well.

Keywords

digital divide neighborhood effects broadband

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AAPOR Cell Phone Task Force. 2010. New considerations for survey researchers when planning and conducting RDD telephone surveys in the U.S. with respondents reached via cell phone numbers. American Association for Public Opinion Research.

Ajzen

1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:179-211.

ALA. 2011. ALA library fact sheet 6. http://www.ala.org/ala/professionalresources/libfactsheets/alalibraryfactsheet06.cfm (accessed September 26, 2011).

ALA Office for Research Statistics. 2010. Job-seeking in U.S. public libraries. American Library Association and the Center for Library and Information Innovation, Univ. of Maryland. http://www.ala.org/ala/research/initiatives/plftas/issuesbriefs/brief_jobs_july.pdf (accessed January 8, 2011).

Becker

Crandall

M. D.

Fisher

K. E.

Kinney

Landry

Rocha

2010. Opportunity for all: How the American public benefits from Internet access at U.S. libraries. Washington, DC: Institute of Museum and Library Services.

Bertot

J. C.

Jaeger

P. T.

Langa

L. A.

McClure

C. R.

2006. Drafted: I want you to deliver e-government. Library Journal. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6359866.html (accessed January 9, 2011).

Bimber

2003. Information and American democracy: Technology and the evolution of political power. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Crawford

S. P.

2011. The new digital divide. New York Times, December 3, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/opinion/sunday/internet-access-and-the-new-divide.html?pagewanted=all.

Caplovitz

1967. The poor pay more: Consumer practices of low income families. New York: Free Press.

10.

Dailey

Bryne

Powell

Karaganis

Chung

2010. Broadband adoption in low-income communities. Washington, DC: The Federal Communications Commission and the Social Science Research Council.

11.

DiMaggio

Bonikowski

, (2008). Make Money Surfing the Web? The Impact of Internet Use on the Earnings of U.S. Workers. American Sociological Review 73 (2): 227-250.

12.

DiMaggio

Hargittai

Celeste

Shafer

2004. Social Inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

13.

Dobransky

Hargittai

2006. The disability divide in Internet access and use. Information, Communication, and Society 9 (3): 313-34.

14.

Dunbar

2011. Wealthy suburbs get best broadband deals; D.C., Rural areas lag behind. Investigative Reporting Workshop, American University School of Communication. http://investigativereportingworkshop.org/connected/story/washington-dc-broadband-speed/ (accessed February 1, 2012).

15.

Ellen

Bearden

Sharma

1991. Resistance to technological innovations: An examination of the role of self-efficacy and performance satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19 (4): 297-307.

16.

Fairlie

2004. Race and the digital divide. Contributions of Economic Analysis and Policy 3 (1): 1-35. http://www.bepress.com/bejeap (accessed August 10, 2009).

17.

Fairlie

2007. Explaining differences in access to home computers and the Internet: A comparison of Latino groups to other ethnic and racial groups. Electronic Commerce Research 7 (3): 265-91.

18.

FCC (Federal Communications Commission). 2010. Connecting America: The national broadband plan. http://www.broadband.gov (accessed March 20, 2010).

19.

Federal Reserve and Brookings Institution. 2008. The enduring challenge of concentrated poverty in America: Case studies from across the U.S. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

20.

Fong

Cao

2008. Bridges across the digital divide: Residential ecology of Internet use. Canadian Studies in Population 35 (2): 243-68.

21.

Fox

2009. Latinos online, 2006-2008. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org (accessed August 16, 2010).

22.

Gant

J. P.

Turner-Lee

N. E.

Miller

2010. National minority broadband adoption. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.

23.

Giddens

1998. The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

24.

Granovetter

M. S.

1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360-80.

25.

Greenstein

McDevitt

R. C.

2010. Evidence of a modest price decline in US broadband services. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper Series No. 16166.

26.

Haddon

2000. Social exclusion and information and communication technologies: Lessons from studies of single parents and the young elderly. New Media and Society 2 (4): 387-406.

27.

Hargittai

2002. The second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday 7 (4).

28.

Hargittai

2003. The digital divide and what to do about it. In New economy handbook, edited by Jones

D. C.

, 821-39. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

29.

Hargittai

Hinnant

2008. Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research 35:602-21.

30.

Hargittai

Shafer

2006. Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly 87 (2): 432-48.

31.

Hassani

S. N.

2006. Locating digital divides at home, work, and everywhere else. Poetics 34:250-72.

32.

Holloway

S. R.

Mulherin

2004. The effect of adolescent neighborhood poverty on adult employment. Journal of Urban Affairs 26 (4): 427-54.

33.

Horrigan

J. B.

2004. Broadband penetration on the upswing. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org (accessed August 28, 2009).

34.

Horrigan

(2010). Broadband Adoption and Use in America. Washington, D.C.: The Federal Communications Commission. http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/FCCSurvey.pdf.

35.

Horrigan

J. B.

2012. Broadband adoption in 2012: Little movement since ’09 & stakeholders can do more to spur adoption. TechNet. http://www.technet.org/new-technet-study-on-two-year-anniversary-of-national-broadband-plan-u-s-adoption-rates-level-off/.

36.

Howard

Rainie

Jones

2001. Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist 45:383-404.

37.

Jargowsky

P. A.

1997. Poverty and place: Ghettos, barrios and the American City. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

38.

Jargowsky

P. A.

El Komi

2011. Before or after the bell? School context and neighborhood effects on student achievement. In Neighborhood and Life Chances: How Place Matters in Modern America, edited by Newburger

H. B.

Birch

E. L.

Wachter

S. M.

, 50-72. Philadelphia, PA: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.

39.

Joassart-Marcelli

P. M.

with Musso

Wolch

J. R.

2005. The fiscal consequences of concentrated poverty in a metropolitan region. Annals of the Association of American Geography 95 (2): 336-56.

40.

Kang

2011. As smartphones proliferate, some users are cutting the computer cord. The Washington Post. July 11, 2011. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/as-smartphones-proliferate-some-users-are-cutting-the-computer-cord/2011/07/11/gIQA6ASi9H_story.html (accessed February 5, 2012).

41.

Kaplan

Mossberger

2012. Prospects for poor neighborhoods in the broadband era: Neighborhood level influences on technology use at work. Economic Development Quarterly 26 (1): 95-105.

42.

Katz

J. E.

Rice

R. E.

2002. Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

43.

Katz

1994. Self-image, locus of control, and computer-related attitudes. In Lessons from learning, edited by R. Lewis and P. Mendelsohn, 105-9. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

44.

Kenski

Stroud

N. J.

2006. Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 50 (2): 173-92.

45.

Kim

Y. C.

Jung

J. Y.

Ball-Rokeach

2007. Ethnicity, place, and communication technology. Effects of ethnicity on multi-dimensional Internet connectedness. Information Technology and People 20 (3): 282-303.

46.

Lenhart

2003. The ever-shifting Internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide. http://www.pewinternet.org (accessed August 28, 2009).

47.

Litan

R. E.

Rivlin

A. M.

, eds. 2002. The economic payoff from the Internet revolution. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

48.

Livingston

Parker

Fox

2009. Latinos online, 2006-2008: Narrowing the gap. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.

49.

Massey

D. S.

Denton

N. A.

1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

50.

Mossberger

Kaplan

Gilbert

2008. Going online without easy access: A tale of three cities. Journal of Urban Affairs 30 (5): 469-88.

51.

Mossberger

Tolbert

C. J.

2009. Digital excellence in Chicago: A citywide view of technology use. http://www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/doit/supp_info/digital_excellenceinchicagoacitywideviewoftechnologyuse.html (accessed February 8, 2012).

52.

Mossberger

Tolbert

C. J.

Franko

Forthcoming. Digital cities: The Internet and the geography of opportunity. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

53.

Mossberger

Tolbert

C. J.

Gilbert

2006. Race, place and information technology. Urban Affairs Review 41 (5): 583-620.

54.

Mossberger

Tolbert

C. J.

McNeal

2008. Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

55.

Mossberger

Tolbert

C. J.

Stansbury

2003. Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.

56.

NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce). 2010. Digital nation: 21st Century America’s progress toward universal broadband access. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/2010/NTIA_internet_use_report_Feb2010.pdf (accessed February 18, 2010).

57.

Norris

2001. Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

58.

OECD. 2011. OECD broadband portal. http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3746,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html.

59.

Ono

Zavodny

2008. Immigrants, English ability and the digital divide. Social Forces 86 (4): 1455-79.

60.

Orfield

Lee

2005. Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University. http://www.civilrightsproject.harvard.edu (accessed August 10, 2009).

61.

Primo

D. M.

Jacobsmeier

M. L.

Milyo

2007. Estimating the impact of state policies and institutions with mixed-level data. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7 (4): 446-59.

62.

Rosen

2011. Universal service fund reform: Expanding broadband Internet access in the United States. Issues in technology innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

63.

Sampson

R. J.

Morenoff

J. D.

Gannon-Rowley

2002. Assessing neighborhood effects: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 443-78.

64.

Schement

J. R.

Forbes

S. C.

2000. Identifying temporary and permanent gaps in universal service. Information Society 16:117-26.

65.

Schlozman

K. L.

Verba

Brady

H. E.

2010. Weapon of the strong? Participatory inequality and the Internet. Perspectives on Politics 8 (2): 487-509.

66.

Schmeida

McNeal

2007. The telehealth divide: Disparities in searching for public health information online. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 18 (3): 637-47.

67.

Selwyn

2003. Apart from technology: Understanding people’s non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technology in Society 25: 99-116.

68.

Selwyn

Gorard

Furlong

2005. Whose Internet is it anyway? Exploring adults’ (non)use of the Internet in everyday life. European Journal of Communication 20: 5-26.

69.

Smith

2012. Nearly half of American adults are smartphone owners. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Smartphone-Update-2012.aspx.

70.

Stone

C. N.

Henig

J. R.

Jones

B. D.

Pierannunzi

2001. Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

71.

Swanstrom

Ryan

Stigers

K. M.

2006. Measuring concentrated poverty: Did it really decline in the 1990s? Working Paper 2007-09. Univ. of California, Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Building Resilient Regions. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/2qm2s1vq;jsessionid=9417B29757E3323A7F051CCC95DED1E2#page-1 (accessed January 12, 2011).

72.

Todman

Monaghan

1994. Qualitative differences in computer experience, computer anxiety, and students’ use of computers: A path model. Computers and Human Behavior 10 (4): 529-39.

73.

Tolbert

McNeal

2003. Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation. Political Research Quarterly 56 (2): 175-85.

74.

Van Dijk

J. A. G. M.

2005. The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

75.

Van Dijk

J. A. G. M.

2008. One Europe, digitally divided. In Routledge handbook of Internet politics, edited by Chadwick

Howard

P. N.

, 288-304. London: Routledge.

76.

Van Duersen

A. J. A. M.

Van Dijk

J. A. G. M.

2009a. Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly 26: 333-40.

77.

Van Duersen

A. J. A. M.

Van Dijk

J. A. G. M.

2009b. Using the Internet: Skill related problems in users’ online behavior. Interacting with Computers 21 (5-6): 393-402.

78.

Warschauer

2003. Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

79.

West

D. M.

2005. Digital government: Technology and public sector performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

80.

Wilson

W. J.

1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass and public policy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

81.

Wilson

W. J.

1996. When work disappears. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

82.

Wilson

W. J.

De Souza Briggs

2005. The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

83.

Wortham

2009. Mobile Internet use shrinks the digital divide. The New York Times. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/22/mobile-internet-use-shrinks-digital-divide/ (accessed February 5, 2012).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.17 MB

Unraveling Different Barriers to Internet Use

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material