Since 1992, the federal government has established regulations encouraging the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to purchase home mortgages originated in neighborhoods traditionally underserved by financial institutions, with the aim of stimulating housing-market activity within such neighborhoods. This research tests this proposition empirically through an econometric analysis of variations in secondary mortgage market activity and single-family home prices across underserved census tracts in Cleveland, Ohio, from 1993 to 1999. We find no large or statistically significant relationship between variations in secondary-market purchasing rates of home-purchase mortgages in underserved neighborhoods and home prices one or two years hence, controlling for a rich variety of dwelling and neighborhood characteristics. These conclusions follow both for GSE and other sectors of the secondary market. We find some evidence that the secondary market was more responsive to changes in home prices than vice versa. We offer a possible explanation and draw policy implications.
Ambrose, B., R. Buttimer, and T. Thibodeau. 2001. A new spin on the jumbo/conforming loan rate differential. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics23(3): 309-336.
2.
Ambrose, B., and A. Pennington-Cross. 2000. Local economic risk factors and the primary and secondary mortgage market. Regional Science and Urban Economics30(6): 683-702.
3.
Ambrose, B., and T. Thibodeau. 2004. Have the GSE affordable housing goals increased the supply of mortgage credit? Regional Science and Urban Economics34: 263-273.
4.
An, X., R. W. Bostic, and Y. Deng. 2005. Have the affordable housing goals improved housing markets? Unpublished paper, School of Policy, Planning and Development, University of Southern California, October.
5.
Apgar, W., and A. J. Fishbein. 2005. Changing industrial organization of housing finance and changing role of community-based organizations. In Building assets—Building credit, edited by N. Retsinas and E. Belsky, 107-137. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6.
Blackley, D. M., and J. R. Follain.1991. An econometric model of the metropolitan housing market. Journal of Housing Economics1: 140-167.
7.
Bostic, R. W., and S. A. Gabriel.2006. Do the GSEs matter to low-income housing markets? Journal of Urban Economics59(3): 458-475.
8.
Bunce, H. L.2002. The GSEs’ funding of affordable loans: A 2000 update. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, Housing Finance Working Paper Series, Working Paper no. HF-013 (April).
9.
Bunce, H. L., and R. M. Scheessele.1996. The GSEs’ funding of affordable loans. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, Housing Finance Working Paper Series, Working Paper no. HF-001 (December).
10.
Burnett, K., and L. B. Fosburg.2001. Study of multifamily underwriting and the GSEs’ role in the multifamily market. Washington, DC: Abt Associates, Inc. report to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, August.
11.
Can, A. 1997. Spatial segmentation in urban house prices: Alternative approaches. Unpublished Working Paper of the Policy, Research, Evaluation, and Training Division, Fannie Mae Foundation, Washington, DC.
12.
Canner, G. B., and W. Passmore. 1995. Credit risk and the provision of mortgages to lower-income and minority homebuyers. Federal Reserve Bulletin81 (November): 989-1016.
13.
Canner, G. B., W. Passmore, and B. J. Surette.1996. Distribution of credit risk among providers of mortgages to lower-income and minority homebuyers. Federal Reserve Bulletin82(December): 1077-1102.
14.
Ellen, I. G.2000. Sharing America’s neighborhoods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
15.
Evanoff, D., and L. Segal. 1996. CRA and fair lending regulations. Economic Perspectives: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago20(3): 19-43.
16.
Fannie Mae. 2000. Comment letter to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on HUD’s notice of proposed rulemaking on the affordable housing goals for 2000 and beyond. Available from www.fanniemae.com/neighborhoods/comment_letter.html.
17.
Freddie Mac. 1998. We open doors for America’s families: Annual housing activities report. McLean, VA: Freddie Mac.
18.
Galster, G. C.1998. An econometric model of the urban opportunity structure: Cumulative causation among city markets, social problems, and underserved areas. Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation.
19.
Galster, G. C., and E. L. Godfrey.2005. By words and deeds: Steering by real estate agents in metropolitan housing markets in 2000. Journal of the American Planning Association71(3): 1-19.
20.
Galster, G. C., A. M. Santiago, R. Smith, and P. A. Tatian.1999. Assessing property value impacts of dispersed housing subsidy programs (Urban Institute report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
21.
Goodman, A. C.1990. Demographics of individual housing demand. Regional Science and Urban Economics20: 83-102.
22.
Green, R. K., and S. Malpezzi. 2003. A primer on U.S. housing markets and housing policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, AREUEA Monograph Series no. 3.
23.
Grieson, R., and J. White. 1989. The existence and capitalization of neighborhood externalities. Journal of Urban Economics25: 68-76.
24.
Heuson, A., W. Passmore, and R. Sparks. 2001. Credit scoring and mortgage securitization: Implications for mortgage rates and credit availability. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics23(3): 337-364.
Immergluck, D.2004. Credit to the community. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
27.
Kmenta, J.1986. Elements of econometrics. 2d ed.New York: Macmillan.
28.
Lind, J. E.1996. Community reinvestment and equal credit opportunity performance of Fannie and Freddie Mac from the 1994 HMDA Data. San Francisco: CANICCOR (February 12).
29.
Listokin, D., and E. K. Wyly.2000. Making new mortgage markets: Case studies of institutions, home buyers, and communities. Housing Policy Debate11(3): 575-644.
30.
MacDonald, H.1996. Expanding access to the secondary mortgage markets: The role of central city lending goals. Growth and Change27: 298-312.
31.
Manchester, P. B.1998. Characteristics of mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: 1996-97 Update. Housing Finance Working Paper no. HF-006. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
32.
Manchester, P. B.2002. Goal performance and characteristics of mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, 1998-2000. Housing Finance Working Paper Series, Working Paper no. HF-015 (May). U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
33.
Manchester, P. B., S. G. Neal, and H. L. Bunce.1998. Characteristics of mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, 1993-95. Housing Finance Working Paper Series, Working Paper no. HF-003 (March). Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
34.
McClure, K.1999. The twin mandates given to the GSEs: Which works best, helping low income homebuyers or helping underserved areas?Lawrence, KS: Graduate Program in Urban Planning, University of Kansas.
35.
Megbolugbe, I., and M. Cho. 1993. An empirical analysis of metropolitan housing and mortgage markets. Journal of Housing Research4(2): 191-224.
36.
Muellbauer, J.1974. Household production theory, quality, and the “hedonic technique.”American Economic Review64: 977-994.
37.
Palmquist, R.1992. Valuing localized externalities. Journal of Urban Economics31: 59-68.
38.
Pearce, J. E.2001. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage purchases in low-income and high-minority neighborhoods, 1994-96. Citiscape5: 265-316.
39.
Pennington-Cross, A.2002. Subprime lending in the primary and secondary markets. Journal of Housing Research13(1): 31-50.
40.
Rosen, S.1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets. Journal of Political Economy82: 34-55.
41.
Ross, S. L., and J. M. Yinger.2002. The color of credit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Rothenberg, J., G. C. Galster, R. V. Butler, and J. Pitkin.1991. The maze of urban housing markets: Theory, evidence, and policy. Chicago: Univ of Chicago Press..
43.
Temkin, K., R. Quercia, and G. Galster. 2001. The impact of secondary mortgage market guidelines on affordable and fair lending: A reconnaissance from the front lines. Review of Black Political Economy28(2): 29-52.
44.
Temkin, K., R. Quercia, G. C. Galster, and S. O’Leary. 1998. A study of the GSEs’ single family underwriting guidelines. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Report to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
45.
Thibodeau, T., and B. Ambrose. 2002. An analysis of the effects of the GSE affordable goals on low- and moderate-income families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research (May).
46.
Turner, M. A., and F. Skidmore, eds. 1999. Mortgage lending discrimination: A review of existing evidence. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
47.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2002. 2000 census of population and housing, SF4. Retrieved May 6, 2006, from http://factfinder.census.gov.
48.
U.S. Congress; House of Representatives; Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development; Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs. 1991. Treasury, CBO and GAO reports on FNMA, FHLMC and the Federal Home Loan Bank System. 102nd Congress, 1st Session, May 15 and 29.
49.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. 1995. Economic analysis for the secretary of HUD’s regulation of the federal national mortgage association and the federal home loan mortgage corporation. Washington, DC.
50.
Van Order, Robert1996. Discrimination and the secondary mortgage market. In Mortgage lending, racial discrimination, and federal policy, edited by J. Goering and R. Wienk, 335-363. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
51.
Williams, R.1999. The effect of GSEs, CRA, and institutional characteristics on home mortgage lending to underserved markets. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
52.
Yinger, J. M.1995. Closed doors, opportunities lost: The continuing costs of housing discrimination. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
