This article offers an induction into “immersive cartography,” an emerging approach to inquiry that incorporates the environmental arts, philosophy, and social sciences. Drawing together Deleuze’s propositions for a cartography-art with elements of Whitehead’s speculative empiricism, the author elaborates on the co-creation of a “cartographic network” that can be entered, activated, and extended along a multiplicity of trajectories, opening the inquiry process to more-than-human ecologies of participation. The second part of the article grapples with the complex proliferation of data that immersive cartography sets into motion, developing the concept of the “data event” through an engagement with Whitehead’s theory of prehension.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
2.
BarrettE. (2015). Materiality, language and the production of knowledge: Art, subjectivity and Indigenous ontology. Cultural Studies Review, 21(2), 101–119.
3.
BennettJ. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
4.
BerlantL. (2016). The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(3), 393–419.
5.
BignallS.RigneyD. (2019). Indigeneity, posthumanism and nomad thought: Transforming colonial ecologies. In BraidottiR.BignallS. (Eds.), Posthuman ecologies: Complexity and process after Deleuze (pp. 159–183). Rowman & Littlefield.
BoltB. (2013). Toward a “new materialism” through the arts. In BarrettE.BoltB. (Eds.), Carnal knowledge: Towards a “new materialism” through the arts (pp. 1–14). I.B. Tauris.
8.
BraidottiR. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
9.
BraidottiR.BignallS. (2018). Introduction. In BraidottiR.BignallS. (Eds.), Posthuman ecologies: Complexity and process after Deleuze (pp. 1–25). Rowman & Littlefield.
CloughP. T. (2009). The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 43–61.
12.
ColebrookC. (2016). “A grandiose time of coexistence”: Stratigraphy of the Anthropocene. Deleuze Studies, 10(4), 440–454.
13.
ColeD. R.SomervilleM. (2017). Thinking school curriculum through Country with Deleuze and Whitehead: A process-based synthesis. In NaughtonC.BiestaG.ColeD.R. (Eds.). Art, Artists and Pedagogy (pp. 71–82). Routledge.
14.
de FreitasE. (2016). The new empiricism of the fractal fold: Rethinking monadology in digital times. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 224–234.
15.
de FreitasE. (2018). The biosocial subject: Sensor technologies and worldly sensibility. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(2), 292–308.
16.
de FreitasE.RousellD. (2018, August26–30). Atmospheric intensities: Sensing the places and times of learning through bioaffective technologies [Conference session]. Affects/interfaces/events Conference, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
17.
de FreitasE.RousellD.JägerN. (2019). Relational architectures and wearable space: Smart schools and the politics of ubiquitous sensation. Research in Education, 107, 10–32.
18.
DeleuzeG. (1990). The logic of sense (LesterM., Trans.). Columbia University Press.
19.
DeleuzeG. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the baroque (ConleyT., Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
20.
DeleuzeG. (1997). Essays critical and clinical (GrecoM.A.SmithD.W., Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
21.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (MassumiB., Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
22.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy? (TomlinsonH.BurchellG., Trans.). Columbia University Press.
23.
DeloriaV.WildcatD. R. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Fulcrum.
24.
GroszE. (2017). The incorporeal: Ontology, ethics, and the limits of materialism. Columbia University Press.
25.
HansenM. B. (2014). Feed-forward: On the future of 21st century media. University of Chicago Press.
26.
IrwinR. (1985). Being and circumstance: Notes towards a conditional art. The Lapis Press.
27.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2013). Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(4), 261–271.
KuntzA. M. (2018). Qualitative inquiry, cartography, and the promise of material change. Routledge.
30.
KwonM. (2002). One place after another: Site-specific art and locational identity. MIT Press.
31.
LacyS. (1994). Cultural pilgrimages and metaphoric journeys. In LacyS. (Ed.), Mapping the terrain: New genre public art (pp. 19–26). Bay Press.
32.
LatherP. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645.
33.
MacLureM. (2013). Researching without representation: Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.
34.
ManningE. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Duke University Press.
35.
ManningE.MassumiB. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
36.
ManningE. (2015a). Against Method. In VanniniP. (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (pp. 52–71). New York: Routledge.
37.
ManningE. (2016). The Minor Gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
38.
MartinA. D.KamberelisG. (2013). Mapping not tracing: Qualitative educational research with political teeth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 668–679.
MassumiB. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
41.
MassumiB. (2015). The politics of affect. Polity Press.
42.
McCormackD. (2018). Atmospheric things: On the allure of elemental envelopment. Duke University Press.
43.
O’RourkeK. (2013). Walking and mapping: Artists as cartographers. MIT Press.
44.
ProteviJ. (2013). Life, war, earth: Deleuze and the sciences. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
45.
RolnikS. (2017). The spheres of insurrection: Suggestions for combating the pimping of Life. E-flux, 86, 1–11.
46.
RosiekJ. L.SnyderJ.PrattS. L. (2020). The new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qualitative Inquiry, 26, 331–346.
47.
RousellD. (2015). The cartographic network: Re-imagining university learning environments through the methodology of immersive cartography. Multidisciplinary Research in the Arts, 5(1), 1–33.
48.
RousellD. (2016). Dwelling in the anthropocene: Reimagining university learning environments in response to social and ecological change. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(02), 137–153.
49.
RousellD. (2017). Mapping the data event: A posthumanist approach to art|education|research in a regional university. In KnightL.CutcherA. (Eds.), Arts, research, education: Connections and directions (pp. 203–220). Springer.
50.
RousellD. (2019b). Walking with media: Towards a mixed reality pedagogy in university learning environments. In SchnadelbachH.KirkD. (Eds.), People, personal data, and the built environment (pp. 205–229). Springer.
51.
RousellD. (2018). Doing little justices: Speculative propositions for an immanent environmental ethics. Environmental Education Research, 1–15.
52.
RousellD.Cutter-MackenzieA. (2018). The parental milieu: Biosocial connections with animals, technologies, and the Earth. Journal of Environmental Education, 50(2), 84–96.
53.
RousellD.GallagherM.WrightM. (2018). Becoming listening bodies: Sound walking as a pedagogy of sensation [Conference session]. Arts-based and Artistic Research, Tate Gallery, Liverpool, UK, March13-17, 2018
54.
St. PierreE. A. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657.
55.
St. PierreE. A. (2017). Deleuze and Guattari’s language for new empirical inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1080–1089.
56.
St. PierreE. A. (2016). The empirical and the new empiricisms. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 111–124.
57.
St. PierreE. A.JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110.
58.
StengersI. (2005). Introductory Notes on an Ecology of Practices. Cultural Studies Review. 11(1), 183–196.
59.
ShaviroS. (2009). Without criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and aesthetics. MIT Press.
60.
ShaviroS. (2014). The universe of things: On speculative realism. University of Minnesota Press.
61.
SimondonG. (2017). On the mode of existence of technical objects (MalaspinaC.RogoveJ., Trans.). Univocal. (Original work published 1958)
62.
SomervilleW.TurnerB. (2020). Engaging with indigenous research methodologies: The centrality of country, positionality and community need. Journal of Australian Studies, 44, 182–184.
63.
TuckE.McKenzieM. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. Routledge.
64.
UlmerJ. B.Koro-LjungbergM. (2015). Writing visually through (methodological) events and cartography. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(2), 138–152.
65.
WhiteheadA. N. (1964). The concept of nature. Cambridge University Press.
66.
WhiteheadA. N. (1967a). Adventures of ideas. The Free Press.
67.
WhiteheadA. N. (1967b). Science and the modern world. The Free Press.
68.
WhiteheadA. N. (1978). Process and reality. The Free Press.
69.
ZepkeS. (2005). The abstract machine: Art and ontology in Deleuze and Guattari. New York, NY: Routledge.
