This article revisits a co-learning experience of a graduate course on the political ecology of water at the Master’s program in Development Studies in a Colombian private university which employed a thinking with water teaching methodology based on the ontological-epistemological-methodological unity. Water as a nearly universal solvent not only conditions life on the planet but also defines human imaginary. The physical characteristics of water such as its fluidity, plasticity, and conductivity enable a multidimensional, nonlineal, and relational thought. Because of its universal familiarity and its indispensability for life, water offers intuitive ways of knowing. The revision of the class experience showed that the materiality of water affects the dynamic of the course. It supports the idea of the performativity (Barad) of our knowledge about Self and the world. Spontaneous and resistant, water clears hidden, silenced, or ignored meanings of both social and environmental relations and, so, stimulates critical self-reflection, catalyzes social change, and promotes social justice.
BraidottiR. (2006a). Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7-8), 197-208.
10.
BraidottiR. (2006b). Transpositions: On nomadic ethics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
11.
BraidottiR. (2013). Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12, 1-19.
12.
BraidottiR. (2016). Posthuman critical theory. In BanerjiD.ParanjapeM. R. (Eds.), Critical posthumanism and planetary futures (pp. 13-32). New York, NY: Springer.
CaineV.MillJ. (2016). Essentials of community-based research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
15.
Centro de Estudos Socias. (2016, September5-7). Artistic and other creative practices as drivers for urban resiliencePaper presented at the Summer School, Museu Municipal de Espinho, Portugal.
16.
ChaterjeeP. (1993). The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
ChaterjeeP. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
18.
ChristoyannopoulosA. (2008). Leo Tolstoy on the state: A detailed picture of Tolstoy’s denunciation of state violence and deception. Anarchist Studies, 16, 20-47.
19.
ClandininD. J. (2013). Engaging in narrative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
DenzinN.LincolnY. S. (2018). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-26). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
26.
DimitriadisG. (2014). The pedagogical turn: QI at 20 years. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 591-593.
27.
DimitriadisG. (2016). Reading qualitative inquiry through critical pedagogy: Some reflections. International Review of Qualitative Research, 9, 140-146.
28.
DobsonA. (2007). Green political thought. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
EckersleyR. (2004). The Green state: Rethinking democracy and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
EscobarA. (2015). Sentipensar con la Tierra: Las Luchas Territoriales y la Dimensión Ontológica de las Epistemologías del Sur AIBR [Feeling-thinking with the Earth: struggles for land and the ontological dimension of the Epistemology of the South]. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 11, 11-32.
31.
EstevaG.PrakashM. S. (1998). Grassroots post-modernism: Remaking the soil of cultures. London, England: Zed Books.
Fals BordaO.MoncayoV. M. (2009). Una sociología sentipensante para América Latina. [Sociology of Feeling-Thinking for Latin America]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales.
34.
FeyerabendP. (1975). Against method. New York, NY: Verso Books.
35.
FreireP. (2000). Cultural action and conscientization. In FreireP. (Ed.), Cultural action for freedom (pp. 39-68). Boston, MA: Harvard Educational Review.
36.
FreireP. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
37.
FreireP. (2010). Cartas a quien pretende enseñar. [Letters to those who intend to teach]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
38.
FrommE. (1974). The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
39.
FrommE. (2006). The art of loving. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
Golovátina-MoraP.Roca ServatD. (2017, August24-25). How to be water in the city? City regeneration through thinking with water. Paper presented at the 2nd International Congress “City Regeneration,” Tampere, Finland.
44.
Golovátina-MoraP.GolovatinaV. (2014). River as a memory in Russian and Czech prose and poetry. In BednaříkP.NoskováH.SoukupováB. (Eds.), Paměť—Národ—Menšiny—Marginalizace—Identity II. Urbánní studie, sv. 7 (pp. 69-79). Praha, Czech Republic: Charles University Press.
HarawayD. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
HarawayD. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In GrossbergL.NelsonC.TreichlerP. A. (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295-337). London, England: Routledge.
48.
HolmesB. (2017). Liquid antiquity. In HolmesH.MartaK. (Eds.), Liquid antiquity (pp. 19-59). Athens, Greece: The Deste Foundation for Contemporary Art.
49.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
JungC.-G. (1977). Bollingen Series: Mysterium Coniunctionis: The collected works (Vol. 14). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
51.
KaganS. (2009). Systems thinking games. In Report on connect2culture & The Asia-Europe dialogue on arts, culture and climate change (pp. 30-32). Singapore: Asia-Europe Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.asef.org/images/docs/809-Project_Report.pdf
52.
Koro-LjungbergM. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without Methodology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
53.
KubyC.AguayoR. C.HollowayN.MulliganJ.ShearS. B.WardA. (2016). Teaching, troubling, transgressing: Thinking with theory in a post-qualitative inquiry course. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 140-148.
54.
LandauerG. (2010). Revolution and other writings: A political reader. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
55.
LatourB. (2004). Politics of nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
LeavyP. (2013). Fiction as research practice: Short stories, novellas, and novels. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
57.
LeffE. (2014, November11). Environmental rationality: The social re-appropriation of nature. Alternautas, 1, 88-99.
58.
LincolnY. S. (1998). The ethics of teaching in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 315-327.
59.
LincolnY. S.LynhamS. A.GubaE. (2018). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In DenzinN.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 108-150). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
60.
ManningE. (2009). Relationscapes: Movement, art, philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
MarcuseH. (1969). An essay on liberation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
62.
MiesM.ShivaV. (1993). Ecofeminism. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood Publications.
MuñozJ. D.CifuentesV. E. (2016, October29). Crónica del río desde el río mismo [Chronicle of the river from the river itself]. Final submission for the graduate seminar “Political Ecology of Water.” Maestría en Desarrollo, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Colombia.
67.
NicelyV. M. (2015). Choreographing the city: Techniques for urban walking. Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies, 11(2), 1-16.
OlesenV. (2018). Feminist qualitative research in the millenium’s first decade: Developments, challenges, prospects. In DenzinN.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 151-175). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
PsarrasB. (2015). Emotive terrains: Exploring the emotional geographies of city through walking as art, senses and embodied technologies (Doctoral thesis). Goldsmiths, University of London, UK.
72.
Pyne FeinbergP. (2016). Towards a walk-based pedagogy. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 14, 147-165.
73.
Rivera-CusicanquiS. (2010). Ch’ixinakax utxiwa. Una reflexión sobre prácticas y discursos descolonizadores. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Tinta Limón Ediciones.
74.
Roca-ServatD. M. (2015). Extractivismo y desarrollo en América del Sur: reflexiones preliminares sobre la justicia hídrica. [Extractivism and the development in South America: preliminary reflections concerning water justice]. In SernaA. E. G.GomesT. A. (Eds.), Espaco, políticas públicas e territorio: Reflexoes a partir da América do Sul [Space, public politics and the territory: reflections from South America]. (pp. 148-176). Recife, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
75.
Roca-ServatD. M. (2016). Aproximaciones epistemológicas y metodológicas al estudio de la (in)justicia hídrica: construyendo conocimiento desde el sur global. [Epistemological approaches and methodologies in water justice studies: constructing knowledge from the Global South]. In DuarteB.YacoubC.HoogestegerJ. (Eds.), La gobernanza del agua: una visión desde la ecología política y la justicia hídrica (pp. 371-389). [Water management: from the perspective of political ecology and water justice]. Quito, Ecuador: Abya-Yala.
76.
Roca-ServatD. M.Golovátina-MoraP. (2016, May19-21). The thought of water. Panel presented at the 12th Inter-national Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
77.
RowlingJ. K. (2007). Harry Potter and the deathly hallows. New York, NY: Arthur A. Levine Books.
78.
RuitenbergC. W. (2012). Learning by walking: Non-formal education as curatorial practice and intervention in public space. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31, 261-275.
79.
SantosB. d. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
80.
ShivaV. (2016). Who really feeds the world: The failures of agribusiness and the promise of agroecology. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
SomervilleM. (2013). Water in a dry place: Place-learning through art and story. New York, NY: Routledge.
86.
StewartT. T.McClureG. (2013). Freire, Bakhtin, and collaborative pedagogy: A dialogue with students and mentors. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 7, 91-108.
87.
St. PierreE. A. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 646-657.
88.
St. PierreE. A. (2015). Practices for the “new” in the new empiricisms, the new materialisms, and post qualitative inquiry. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of research (pp. 75-95). Walnut Grove, CA: Left Coast Press.
89.
SwyngedouwE. (1996). The city as a hybrid—On nature, society and cyborg urbanization. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 7, 65-80.
90.
SwyngedouwE. (2006). Circulations and metabolisms: (Hybrid) natures and (cyborg) cities. Science as Culture, 15, 105-121.
UrryJ.Larsen. (2011). The tourist gaze 3.0. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
97.
ValenciaP.Botero MesaM. (2016, October29).Quebrada La Cabuyala. Entre recuerdos y proyecciones” / River creek La Cabuyala. Between memories and proyections “Political Ecology of Water.” Maestría en Desarrollo, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Colombia.
