This article explore the use of groups as one way of conducting political research within psychology, and challenging the overindividualistic approach of most psychological studies and theories. Calling on her own research studies, the author explores the possibilities presented by groups to create social spaces, in which meaning and narratives are co-constructed in dynamic negotiation. Working with groups in a participatory and democratic process can create rich, deep, and varied knowledge that highlights the wider context of individual experiences. To achieve this aim, personal and group reflexivity must be a part of the research process. In so doing, groups can offer ways to disrupt the dichotomy and change the power relationship between researcher and participant, as groups offer a different composition of research relations, not limited to just two hierarchal positions. The interactions between participants can create a collective mosaic: a fusion of points of view, experiences, and understandings.
AndersonH.GehartD. (2007). Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference. New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
BargalD.GoldM.LewinM. (1992). Introduction: The heritage of Kurt Lewin. Journal of Social Issues, 48(2), 3-13.
3.
BaxandallR.GordonL. (2002). Second-wave feminism. In HewittN. A (Ed.), A companion to American women’s history (pp. 414-432). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
4.
CampbellR.WascoS. M. (2000). Feminist approaches to social science: Epistemological and methodological tenet. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 773-790.
5.
CookJ.FonowM. M. (1986). Knowledge and women’s interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry, 56(4), 2-29.
6.
DavidsonJ.LayderD. (1994). Methods, sex, and madness. London, England: Routledge.
7.
DenzinN. K. (2000). Interpretive ethnography. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 3, 401-409.
8.
DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (2010). Introduction: Qualitative inquiry and global crises. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and global crises (pp. 9-27). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
9.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2002). Introduction. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Qualitative Inquiry Reader (pp. ix-xvi). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
DeVaultM. L. (1996). Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 29-50.
11.
EganF. (1991). Must psychology be individualistic?The Philosophical Review, 100, 179-203.
12.
Elbaz-LuwischF. (1997). Narrative research: Political issues and implications. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 75-83.
13.
Fals BordaO. (2001). Participatory (action) research in social theory: Origins and challenges. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 396-402). London, England: SAGE.
14.
FineM.MacphersonP. (1992). Over dinner: Feminism and adolescent female body. In RadtkeH. L.StamH. J. (Eds.), Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice (pp. 219-246). London, England: SAGE.
15.
GadamerH. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed., WeinsheimerJ.MarshallD. G., Trans.). New York, NY: Crossroad.
16.
GergenK. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309-320.
17.
GossJ. D.LeinbachT. R. (1996). Focus groups as alternative research practice: Experience with transmigrants in Indonesia. Area, 28, 115-123.
18.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
HardingS. G. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
HenriquesJ.HollwayW.UrwinC.VennC.WalkerdineV. (1998). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation, and subjectivity. Florence, KY: Taylor & Frances.
22.
HeronJ. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. London, England: SAGE.
23.
HeronJ.ReasonP. (2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research “with” rather than “on” people. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 179-188). London, England: SAGE.
24.
Hesse-BiberS. N.PiatelliD. (2007). Holistic reflexivity: The feminist practice of reflexivity. In Hesse-BiberS. N. (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 493-514). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
JohnsonA. (1996). “It’s good to talk”: The focus group and the sociological imagination. Sociological Review, 4, 517-538.
26.
KemmisS. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jürgen Hebermas. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 91-102). London, England: SAGE.
27.
LavieM.WilligC. (2005). “I don’t feel like melting butter”: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of “Inorgasmia.”Psychology & Health, 20, 115-128.
28.
Lavie-AjayiM.HolmesD.JonesC. D. R. (2007). We thought we “knew,” so we “did”: A voluntary organization’s beginnings in participative action research. Action Research, 5, 407-429.
29.
Lavie-AjayiM.JonesC.RussellL. (2009). Social sex: Young women and early sexual relationships. In BarkerM.LangdridgeD. (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 93-105). New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
MaguireP. (2001). Uneven ground: Feminisms and action research. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 56-69). London, England: SAGE.
31.
MarcuseH. (1974). Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
32.
MontellF. (1999). Focus group interviews: A new feminist method. NWSA, 11(1), 44-73.
33.
PlummerK. (1995). Telling sexual stories: Power, change and social worlds. New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
ReinharzS. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
SchonD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
