The Dark Side of Truth(s)

Abstract

This article explores the sometimes problematic issue of truth when conducting qualitative research on people's lives. Four ethical dilemmas are presented relating to the potentially harmful consequences of truth encountered by the authors in their own research: a promise to share the analysis of a patient's medical record containing unflattering comments by her physicians; the unintended sharing of a traumatic event, held secret since its occurrence, by a woman inmate; a disagreement with the Institutional Review Board over what constitutes ethical practice in online research; and an interview with a recently released political dissident in a totalitarian country. The authors advocate for multiple venues in which qualitative researchers can discuss ethical dilemmas such as these to learn from one another's experience and together develop a more reflexive practice.

Keywords

truth in research ethical dilemmas reflexive practice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bar-On, D. (1996). Ethical issues in biographical interviews and analysis. In R. Josselson (Ed.), Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives (The Narrative Study of Lives, Vol. 4, pp. 9-21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bogdan, R. , & Biklen, S. (2003). Qualitative research in education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Bok, S. ( 1983). Secrets: On the ethics of concealment and revelation . New York: Pantheon Books.

Brettell, C.B. (1993). When they read what we write: The politics of ethnography. London: Bergin & Garvey.

Ess, C. , & Association of Internet Researchers Working Committee. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations of the AoIR ethics working committee . Available at www.aoir.org/report/ethics/pdf

Fine, M. , Weis, L. , Weseen, S. , & Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107-131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Guba, E.G. , & Lincoln, Y.S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.

Guillemin, M. , & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflectivity, and “ethically important moments ” in research. Qualitative Inquiry , 10(2), 261-280.

Josselson, R. (1996). On writing other people's lives. In R. Josselson (Ed.), Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives (The Narrative Study of Lives, Vol. 4, pp. 60-71). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

10.

Kirsch, G.E. (1999). Ethical dilemmas in feminist research. Albany: State University of New York Press .

11.

Lieblich, A. (1996). Some unforeseen outcomes of conducting narrative research with people of one's own culture. In R. Josselson (Ed.), Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives (The Narrative Study of Lives, Vol. 4, pp. 172-184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

12.

Mauthner, M. (2000). Snippets and silences: Ethics and reflexivity in narratives of sistering. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(4), 287-306.

13.

Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .

14.

Nelson, C. (2004). The brave new world of research surveillance. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 207-218. Oakes, J.M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research: An evaluator's guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443-479.

15.

Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of life 2. London : Sage.

16.

Sennett, R. (1983, February 20). Light on a dark subject. New York Times Review of Books, p. 3.

17.

Sharf, B.F. (1997). Communicating breast cancer on-line: Support and empowerment on the Internet. Women and Health, 26(1), 63-82.

18.

Sharf, B.F. (1999). Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 243-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

19.

Sharf, B.F. , Stanford, A.F. , Montgomery, K. , & Kahler, J. (2004). Negotiating the meaning of pain: A clinical case as text and performance. Inaugural program for the Center for Applied Rhetoric, University of Memphis.