Reflexivity involves examining one’s background and perspectives in relation to the research topic, participants, and the processes and practices of research. Building on the growing field of utilizing arts-based practices in teaching qualitative research, in this article we examine how one doctoral student’s engagement with drawing and painting within and beyond a qualitative research class supported her developing reflexivity. Guided by an interactional ethnographic perspective, we conducted domain, taxonomic, and discourse analyses of the student’s art, reflection journals, video of a class presentation, and retrospective reflections she wrote three years later. Through these analyses we make visible that reflexivity through art creates potentials for understanding and transcending one’s background to create new opportunities for learning about self and research. We also argue that deepening reflexivity requires a commitment to engage in the discomforts of learning in order to develop new ways of thinking and researching.
BergerR (2015) Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research15: 219–234.
2.
BogumilECapous-DesyllasMLaraP, et al. (2017) Art as mode and medium: a pedagogical approach to teaching and learning about self-reflexivity and artistic expression in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education40: 360–378.
3.
ChatfieldSLCooperRHoldenE, et al. (2014) Enhancing the experience: a multiple case study of students’ experiences using art-based techniques in learning qualitative research. The Qualitative Report19: 1–13.
4.
DayS (2012) A reflexive lens: exploring dilemmas of qualitative methodology through the concept of reflexivity. Qualitative Sociology Review8: 60–85.
5.
DelamontS (2012) Introduction: leaving Damascus. In: DelamontS (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Edgar, 1–18.
6.
EisnerE (2012) Art and knowledge. In: KnowlesGJColeAL (eds) Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples and Issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, 3–13.
7.
FinlayL (2002) Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research2: 209–230.
Fletcher-BrownJ (2019) Reflexivity and the challenges of collecting sensitive data in India: a research note. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119833318.
10.
GreenJLBridgesSM (2018) Interactional ethnography. In: FischerFHmelo-SilverCEGoldmanSR, et al. (eds) International Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Routledge, 475–488.
11.
GreenJLKellyGJ (2019) Appendix A: how we look at discourse: definitions of sociolinguistic units. In: KellyGJGreenJL (eds) Theory and Methods for Sociocultural Research in Science and Engineering Education. New York: Routledge, 264–270.
12.
GreenJLSkukauskaiteABakerWD (2012) Ethnography as epistemology: an introduction to educational ethnography. In: ArthurJWaringMJCoeR, et al. (eds) Research methodologies and methods in education. London: Sage, 309–321.
13.
HurdleyRBiddulphMBackhausV, et al. (2017) Drawing as radical multimodality: salvaging Patrick Geddes’s material methodology. American Anthropologist119(4): 748–753.
14.
IvaničR (2005) The discoursal construction of writer identity. Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Literary Research (revised edition). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
15.
KellyGJGreenJL (2019) Framing issues of theory and methods for the study of science and engineering education. In: KellyGJGreenJL (eds) Theory and Methods for Sociocultural Research in Science and Engineering Education. New York: Routledge, 1–28.
16.
LeavyP (2018) Introduction to arts-based research. In: LeavyP (ed.), Handbook of Arts-Based Research. New York: Guilford, 3–21.
17.
MannayD (2016) Visual, Narrative and Creative Research Methods: Application, Reflection and Ethics. New York: Routledge.
18.
Mason-BishH (2019) The elite delusion: reflexivity, identity and positionality in qualitative research. Qualitative Research19: 263–276.
19.
MedvedCTurnerL (2011) Practices and practicing reflexivity: commentary. Women and Language34: 109–113.
20.
MitchellCJ (1984) Typicality and the case study. In: EllenRF (ed.), Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct. New York: Academic Press, 238–241.
21.
MruckKBreuerF (2003) Subjectivity and reflexivity in qualitative research - the FQS issues. Forum: Qualitative Social Research4: Article23.
22.
PillowW (2003) Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE)16: 175–196.
23.
ScottiVAicherAL (2015) Veiling and unveiling: an artistic exploration of self-other processes. Qualitative Inquiry22: 192–197.
24.
SkukauskaiteA (2017) Systematic analyses of layered meanings inscribed in interview conversations: an Interactional ethnographic perspective and its conceptual foundations. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia 39(2): 45–60. DOI: 10.15388/ActPaed.2017.39.11466
25.
SkukauskaiteANoskePGonzalesM (2018) Designing for discomfort: preparing scholars for journeys through qualitative research. International Review of Qualitative Research11(3): 334–349. DOI: 10.1525/irqr.2018.11.3.334
26.
SkukauskaiteA (2019) Constructing transparency in designing and conducting multilayered research in science and engineering education — potentials and challenges of ethnographically informed discourse-based methodologies. In: KellyGJGreenJL (eds) Theory and methods for sociocultural research in science and engineering education. New York: Routledge, 234–255.
27.
SkukauskaiteA (2021) Becoming an ethnographer: living, teaching, and learning ethnographically. In: Sancho-GilJMHernández-HernándezF (eds) Becoming an educational ethnographer: The challenges and opportunities of undertaking research. London: Routledge, 52–63.
28.
SpradleyJ (1980/2016) Participant Observation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
