Engaging Employees in CEO Activism: The Role of Transparent Leadership Communication in Making a Social Impact

Abstract

With a survey of 600 U.S. employees, this study investigated the effect of transparent leadership communication on employee engagement, from the interpretivist approach, in the context of CEO activism. This study examined employees’ perceived psychological needs (i.e., autonomy, competence, and relatedness) as mediators. Results showed that transparent leadership communication is positively associated with employees’ psychological needs. In turn, employees’ psychological needs mediate the impact of transparent leadership communication on employees’ information sharing and activism participation intentions in a CEO activism campaign. Ultimately, this study discussed theoretical and managerial contributions.

Keywords

CEO activism leadership communication self-determination theory employee engagement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baard

P. P.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045–2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x

Bae

H.-S.

(2008). Entertainment-education and recruitment of cornea donors: The role of emotion and issue involvement. Journal of Health Communication, 13(1), 20–36. https://doi/org/10.1080/10810730701806953

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Bensinger

King

(2017). Tech CEOs take a stand against Donald Trump’s immigration order. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/tech-ceos-take-a-stand-against-donald-trumps-immigration-order-1486428105

Branicki

Brammer

Pullen

Rhodes

(2020). The morality of “new” CEO activism. Journal of Business Ethics, 170, 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04656-5

Briscoe

Chin

M. K.

Haambrick

D. C.

(2014). CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1786–1809. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43589330

Brown

L. W.

Manegold

J. G.

Marquardt

D. J.

(2020). The effects of CEO activism on employees person-organization ideological misfit: A conceptual model and research agenda. Business and Society Review, 125, 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12196

Browning

Lee

Park

Y. E.

Kim

Collins

(2020). Muting or meddling? Advocacy as a relational communication strategy affecting organization-public relationships and stakeholder response. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1026–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020916810

Chatterji

A. K.

Toffel

M. W.

(2018). The new CEO activists. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/01/the-new-ceo-activists

10.

Chen

Y.-R. R.

Hung-Baesecke

C.-J. F.

(2014). Examining the internal aspect of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Leader behavior and employee CSR participation. Communication Research Report, 31(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.907148

11.

Ciszek

E. L.

(2015). Bridging the gap: Mapping the relationship between activism and public relations. Public Relations Review, 41, 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.05.016

12.

Ciszek

E. L.

Logan

(2018). Challenging the dialogic promise: How Ben & Jerry’s support for Black Lives Matter fosters dissensus on social media. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498342

13.

Dahl

D. W.

Moreau

C. P.

(2007). Thinking inside the box: Why consumers enjoy constrained creative experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.357

14.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

15.

De Moya

Bravo

. (2016). The role of public relations in ethnic advocacy and activism: A proposed research agenda. Public Relations Inquiry, 5(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X16635225

16.

Dodd

M. D.

Supa

D. W.

(2014). Conceptualizing and measuring corporate social advocacy communication: Examining the impact on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), Article 2. https://www.bellisario.psu.edu/assets/uploads/2014DODDSUPA.pdf

17.

Edinger-Schons

L. M.

Lengler-Graiff

Scheidler

Wieseke

(2018). Frontline employees as corporate social responsibility (CSR) ambassadors: A quasi-field experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3790-9

18.

Gagné

(2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025007614869

19.

Gagné

Deci

E. L.

(2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322

20.

Hair

J. F.

Black

W. C.

Babin

B. J.

Anderson

R. E.

(2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

21.

Hambrick

D. C.

Wowak

A. J.

(2021). CEO sociopolitical activism: A stakeholder alignment model. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0084

22.

Hsieh

S. H.

Chang

(2016). The psychological mechanism of brand co-creation engagement. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 33, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2015.10.001

23.

Hurst

Ihlen

. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and engagement: Commitment, mapping of responsibilities, and closing the loop. In Johnston

K. A.

Taylor

(Eds.), The handbook of communication engagement (pp. 133–147). Wiley-Blackwell.

24.

Jelen-Sanchez

(2017). Engagement in public relations discipline: Themes, theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches. Public Relations Review, 43, 934–944. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.002

25.

Y. G.

Chen

Z. F.

Tao

Z. C.

(2019). Functional and emotional traits of corporate social media message strategies: Behavioral insights from S&P 500 Facebook data. Public Relations Review, 45(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.12.001

26.

Y. G.

Tao

Rim

(2021). Theoretical insights of CSR research in Communication from 1980 to 2018: A bibliometric network analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04748-w

27.

Jiang

Luo

(2018). Crafting employee trust: From authenticity, transparency to engagement. Journal of Communication Management, 22(2), 138–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-07-2016-0055

28.

Jiang

Men

R. L.

(2017). Creating an engaged workforce: The impact of authentic leadership, transparent organizational communication, and work-life enrichment. Communication Research, 44(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613137

29.

Johnston

K. A.

Taylor

(2018). Engagement as communication pathways, possibilities, and future directions. In Johnston

K. A.

Taylor

(Eds.), The handbook of communication engagement (pp. 1–15). Wiley-Blackwell.

30.

Kang

Sung

(2017). How symmetrical employee communication leads to employee engagement and positive employee communication behaviors: The mediation of employee-organization relationships. Journal of Communication Management, 21(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-04-2016-0026

31.

Kim

J.-N.

Grunig

J. E.

(2010). Reconceptualizing the communicative action of publics: Acquisition, selection, and transmission of information in problematic situations. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4, 126–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531181003701913

32.

Kline

R. B.

(1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.

33.

Krishna

(2021). Employee activism and internal communication. In Krishna

(Ed.), Current trends and issues in internal communication (pp. 113–129). Palgrave Macmillan.

34.

Kull

A. J.

Heath

T. B.

(2016). You decide, we donate: Strengthening consumer–brand relationships through digitally co-created social responsibility. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.04.005

35.

Larcker

D. F.

Miles

S. A.

Tayan

Wright-Violich

(2018). The double-edged sword of CEO activism. Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Closer Look Series: Topics, Issues and Controversies in Corporate Governance No. CGRP-74; Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 19-5. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3283297

36.

Lee

Tao

(2021). Does perceived morality of CEO activism matter? Understanding employees’ responses to CEO actions on sociopolitical issues. Management Decision, 59(10), 2329–2354. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2020-0498

37.

Lemon

L. L.

(2019). The employee experience: How employees make meaning of employee engagement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 31(5–6), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2019.1704288

38.

Liu

(2021, April). Zoom CEO Eric Yuan and hundreds of Asian American business leaders pledge $10 million to AAPI causes. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/01/asian-american-business-leaders-pledge-10-million-toward-aapi-causes.html

39.

Men

L. R.

Chen

Z. F.

Y. G.

(2021). Cultivating relationships with startup employees: The role of entrepreneurs’ leadership communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(4), 518–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211017918

40.

Men

L. R.

Y. G.

Chen

Z. F.

(2020). Strategic communication for startups and entrepreneurs in China. Routledge.

41.

Men

L. R.

Stacks

D. W.

(2014). Effects of authentic leadership on strategic internal communication and employee-organization relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 36(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.908720

42.

Mikulincer

Shaver

P. R.

(2005). Attachment security, compassion, and altruism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00330.x

43.

Moskalenko

McCauley

(2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 2 1(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550902765508

44.

Opoku-Dakwa

Chen

C. C.

Rupp

D. E.

(2018). CEO initiative characteristics and employee engagement: An impact-based perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2281

45.

Park

Berger

B. K.

(2004). The presentation of CEOs in the press 1990–2000: Increasing salience, positive valence, and a focus on competency and personal dimensions of image. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(1), 93–125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1601_4

46.

Pavey

Greitemeyer

Sparks

(2011). Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motives and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211405994

47.

Rawlins

(2009). Give the emperor a mirror: Toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260802153421

48.

Robinson

S. R.

Irmak

Jayachandran

(2012). Choice of cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing, 76, 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.09.0589

49.

Ryan

R. M.

Brown

K. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2007). How integrative is attachment theory? Unpacking the meaning and significance of felt security. Psychological Inquiry, 18(3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701512778

50.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000). Self-Determination and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

51.

Schultz

P. P.

Ryan

R. M.

Niemiec

C. P.

Legate

Williams

G. C.

(2015). Mindfulness, work climate, and psychological need satisfaction in employee well-being. Mindfulness, 6(5), 971–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0338-7

52.

Tao

Y. G.

(2020). Firm-determined or consumer-determined corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Examining the effects of choice-of-cause in cause-related marketing. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420918397

53.

Tao

Song

Ferguson

M. A.

Kochhar

(2018). Employees’ prosocial behavioral intentions through empowerment in CSR decision-making. Public Relations Review, 44, 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.002

54.

Taylor

Kent

M. L.

(2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106

55.

Trougakos

J. P.

Hideg

Cheng

B. H.

Beal

D. J.

(2014). Lunch breaks unpacked: The role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 405–421. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.1072

56.

Van den Broeck

Ferris

D. L.

Chang

C. H.

Rosen

C. C

. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058

57.

Van den Broeck

Vansteenkiste

White

H. D.

Soenes

Lens

. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 981–1002. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X481382

58.

Verčič

A. T.

Vokić

N. P.

(2017). Engaging employees through internal communication. Public Relations Review, 43(5), 885–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.005

59.

Weber Shandwick & KRC Research. (2018). CEO activism in 2018: Half of Americans say CEO activism influences government. https://www.webershandwick.com/news/ceo-activism-in-2018-half-of-americans-say-ceo-activism-influences-government/

60.

Weber Shandwick, unitedminds, & KRC Research. (2019). Employee activism in the age of purpose: Employees (up)rising. https://www.webershandwick.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Employee-Activism-in-the-Age-of-Purpose-FINAL.pdf

61.

White

(1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 279–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934

62.

Yue

C. A.

Men

L. R.

Ferguson

M. A.

(2019). Bridging transformational leadership, transparent communication, and employee openness to change: The mediating role of trust. Public Relations Review, 45, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.04.012