This study investigates how exposure to different news sources, propensity to vote (PTV) for a party and demographics are related to belief in conspiracy theories drawing on three repeated cross-sectional surveys in Germany 2017–2019. Results show that frequent exposure to alternative news sites and video-sharing platforms increased conspiratorial beliefs. Frequency of exposure to the quality press, public service TV news, and news aggregators diminished beliefs in conspiracy theories. Exposure to TV news, legacy media online, tabloids, social media, and user comments was unrelated to such beliefs. PTV for far left and right parties increased conspiratorial beliefs, moderate party preference reduced them.
AllcottH.GentzkowM.YuC. (2019). Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research and Politics, First published May 9, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019848554
2.
BanasJ. A.MillerG. (2013). Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research, 39, 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12000
3.
BenklerY.FarisR.RobertsH. (2018). Network propaganda. Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.
4.
BessiA.ZolloF.Del VicarioM.PuligaM.ScalaA.CaldarelliG.UzziB.QuattrociocchiW. (2016). Users polarization on Facebook and Youtube. PLOS ONE, 11(8), Article e0159641. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159641
5.
BiaM.MatteiA. (2008). A Stata package for the estimation of the dose-response function through adjustment for the generalized propensity score. The Stata Journal, 8, 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0800800303
6.
BrionesR.NanX.MaddenK.WaksL. (2012). When vaccines go viral: An analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on youtube. Health Communication, 27, 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.610258
7.
ButterM. (2018). “Nichts ist, wie es scheint.” Über Verschwörungstheorien [Nothing is as it seems to be. On conspiracy theories]. Suhrkamp.
8.
ButterM.KnightP. (Eds.). (2020). Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories. Routledge.
9.
CinelliM.QuattrociocchiW.GaleazziA.ValensiseC. M.BrugnoliE.SchmidtA. L.ZolaP.ZolloF.ScalaA. (2020). The COVID‑19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10, 16598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
10.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR.BroadnaxS.BlaineB. E. (1999). Belief in U.S. government conspiracies against Blacks among Black and White college students: Powerlessness or system blame?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(8), 941–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511003
11.
Del VicarioM.BessiA.ZolloF.PetroniF.ScalaA.CaldarelliG.StanleyH. E.QuattrociocchiW. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113
12.
DonovanJ.boydd. (2021). Stop the presses? Moving from strategic silence to strategic amplification in a networked media ecosystem. American Behavioral Scientist, 65, 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878229
13.
DouglasK. M.Sutton, . (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influences of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. Journal of Social Psychology, 148(2), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.2.210-222
14.
DouglasK. M.UscinskiJ. E.SuttonR. M.CichockaA.NefesT.AngC. S.DeraviF. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Advances in Political Psychology, 40(Suppl. 1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
15.
DrochonH. (2018). Who beliefs in conspiracy theories in Great Britain and Europe? In UscinskiJ. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 337–347). Oxford University Press.
16.
EndersA. M.SmallpageS. M. (2018). Polls, plots, and party politics: Conspiracy theories in contemporary America. In UscinskiJ. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 298–318). Oxford University Press.
17.
ErnalaS. K.BurkeM.LeavittA.EllisonN. B. (2020, April). How well do people report time spent on Facebook? An evaluation of established survey questions with recommendations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376435
18.
GarrettR. K. (2019). Social media’s contribution to political misperceptions in U.S. Presidential elections. PLOS ONE, 14(3), Article e0213500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213500
19.
GarrettR. K.WeeksB. E. (2017). Epistemic beliefs role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation. PLOS ONE, 1–17. https://doi.org/org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184733
20.
GarrettR. K.WeeksB. E.NeoR. L. (2016). Driving a wedge between evidence and beliefs: How online ideological news exposure promotes political misperceptions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21, 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12164
GidronN.AdamsJ.HorneW. (2020). American affective polarization in comparative perspective. In LeeF. E. (Ed.), Cambridge Elements in American Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914123
GuessA. M.LyonsB. A. (2020). Misinformation, disinformation, and online propaganda. In PersilyN.TuckerJ.A. (Eds.), Social media and democracy (pp. 10–33). Cambridge University Press.
25.
HallinD. C.ManciniP. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
26.
HameleersM.BosL.de VreeseC. H. (2017). The appeal of media populism: The media preferences of citizens with populist attitudes. Mass Communication & Society, 20(4), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1291817
27.
HarambamJ.AupersS. (2017). “I am not a conspiracy theorist”: Relational identifications in the Dutch conspiracy milieu. Cultural Sociology, 11(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975516661959
28.
HarveyA. M.ThompsonS.LacA.CoolidgeF. L. (2019). Fear and derision: A quantitative content analysis of provaccine and antivaccine internet memes. Health Education & Behavior, 46(6), 1012–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119866886
29.
HiranoK.ImbensG. W. (2004). The propensity score with continuous treatments. In GelmanA.MengX. (Eds.), Applied Bayesian modeling and causal inference from incomplete-data perspectives (pp. 73–84). John Wiley.
30.
HollanderB. A. (2010). Persistence in the perception of Barack Obama as a Muslim in the 2008 presidential campaign. Journal of Media and Religion, 9, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348421003738769
31.
HollanderB. A. (2018). Partisanship, individual differences, and news media exposure as predictors of conspiracy beliefs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(3), 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017728919
ImhoffR.BruderM. (2014). Speaking (Un-)Truth to power: Conspiracy Mentality as a Generalised Political Attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930
34.
JolleyD.DouglasK. M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLOS ONE, 9(2), Article e89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
35.
Kelley-RomanoS.CarewK. L. (2019). Make America hate again: Donald Trump and the Birther Conspiracy. Journal of Hate Studies, 14, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.33972/jhs.123
36.
KrouwelA. P. M.KutiyskiQ.van ProoijenJ.-W.MartinssonJ.MarkstedtE. (2017). Does extreme political ideology predict conspiracy beliefs, economic evaluations and political trust? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(2), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i2.745
37.
KullS.RamsayC.LewisE. (2003). Misperceptions the media and the Iraq war. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 569–598. https://doi.org/org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb00406.x
38.
LewandowskyS.EckerU.CookJ. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
39.
MeirickP. C. (2012). Motivated misperception? Party, education, partisan, news and belief in “death panels.”Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012468696
40.
MillerJ. M.SaundersK. L.FarhartC. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234
NyhanB. (2010). Why the “death panel” myth wouldn’t die: Misinformation in the health care reform debate. The Forum, 8(1), Article 5.
43.
OliverJ. E.WoodT. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
44.
OlsenJ. (2018). The left party and the AfD: Populist competitors in Eastern Germany. German Politics & Society, 36(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2018.360104
45.
PetersenA. M.VincentE. M.WesterlingA. L. (2020). Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. Nature Communications, 11, Article 553. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-14507-6
46.
PriorM. (2009). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp002
RojeckiA.MerazS. (2016). Rumors and factitious informational blends: The role of the web in speculative politics. New Media & Society, 18(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535724
49.
ScharkowM.MangoldF.StierS.BreuerJ. (2020). How social network sites and other online intermediaries increase exposure to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(6), 2761–2763. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918279117
50.
SchultzT. (2018). The rumor mill. On the relationship between journalism and conspiracy theories. Journalism Research, 1(2), 21–27.
51.
SchulzA. (2019). Where populist citizens get the news: An investigation of news audience polarization along populist attitudes in 11 countries. Communication Monographs, 86(1), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1508876
52.
ShapiroM. A.ParkH. W. (2015). More than entertainment: YouTube and public responses to the science of global warming and climate change. Social Science Information, 54(1), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018414554730
53.
Slavtcheva-PetkovaV. (2016). Are newspapers online discussion boards democratic tools or conspiracy theories engines? A case study on an Eastern European media war. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(4), 1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015610880
54.
StarbirdK. (2017). Examining the alternative media ecosystem through the production of alternative narratives of mass shooting events on Twitter. AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
55.
SteculaD. A.PickupM. (2021). How populism and conservative media fuel conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 and what it means for COVID-19 behaviors. Research & Politics, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168021993979
56.
StempelC.HargroveT.StempelG. H. (2007). Media use, social structure, and belief in 9/11 conspiracy theories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400210
57.
StiegerS.GumhalterN.TranU. S.VoracekM.SwamiV. (2013). Girl in the cellar: A repeated cross-sectional investigation of belief in conspiracy theories about the kidnapping of Natascha Kampusch. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00297
SwireB.BerinskyA. J.LewandowskyS.EckerU. K. H. (2017). Processing political misinformation: Comprehending the Trump phenomenon. Royal Society Open Science, 4(3), 2–21. https://doi.org/org/10.1098/rsos.160802
60.
UscinskiJ. E.ParentJ. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press.
61.
Van AelstP.StrömbäckJ.AalbergT.EsserF.de VreeseC.MatthesJ.HopmannD.SalgadoS.HubeN.StępińskaA.PapathanassopoulosS.BerganzaR.LegnanteG.ReinemannC.SheaferT.StanyerJ. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
62.
van ZoonenL.VisF.MiheljS. (2011). YouTube interactions between agonsim, antagonism and dialogue: Video responses to the anti-Islam film. Fitna. New Media & Society, 13(8), 1283–1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811405020
WarnerB. R.Neville-ShepardR. (2014). Echoes of a conspiracy: Birthers, truthers and the cultivation of extremism. Communication Quarterly, 62(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2013.822407
WoodM. J.DouglasK. M. (2013). “What about building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 409. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409
67.
WoodM. J.DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786
68.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
69.
Yusha’uM. J. (2015). Extremism or terrorism: Communicating islamophobia on YouTube in the Norwegian attacks. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 8(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.8.2.171_1
