Despite the importance of companies’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts to support the issue of empowering women, little is known about which communication strategies are effective for a successful CSR initiative. This research investigated how CSR messages influences consumer evaluations of a CSR activity supporting women’s empowerment via consumers’ cause involvement by conducting two experimental studies. In Study 1, a 2 (CSR message type: in-group vs. out-group) × 2 (gender: female vs. male) online factorial experiment (n = 140) was employed. The results indicate that consumers evaluated the CSR activity more positively when they were exposed to an in-group message than an out-group message. To increase the validity and explain the process by which CSR message types influence consumer evaluations of a CSR activity, Study 2 was conducted. Psychological distance manipulated by CSR campaign messages increased an individual’s level of cause involvement, which in turn influenced the individuals’ response to the CSR activities. Implications are discussed.
AbitbolA.SternadoriM. (2019). Championing women’s empowerment as a catalyst for purchase intentions: Testing the mediating roles of OPRs and brand loyalty in the context of femvertising. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1552963
AtkerT. (2015). How women empowerment as a CSR (corporate social responsibility) topic can be taken as competitive advantage to stay competitive in the RMG industry?IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 17(10), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-171017681
4.
BaroneM. J.NormanA. T.MiyazakiA. D. (2007). Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better?Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2007.03.006
5.
Becker-OlsenK. L.CudmoreB. A.HillR. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001
6.
Beise-ZeeR. (2011). Corporate social responsibility or cause-related marketing? The role of cause specificity of CSR. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761111101921
7.
BergkvistL.ZhouK. Q. (2019). Cause-related marketing persuasion research: An integrated framework and directions for further research. International Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1452397
8.
Bigné-AlcañizE.Currás-PérezR.Ruiz-MaféC.Sanz-BlasS. (2010). Consumer behavioural intentions in cause-related marketing. The role of identification and social cause involvement. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 7(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-010-0053-6
9.
BlockJ. H. (1984). Sex role identity and ego development. Jossey-Bass.
10.
BornemannT.HomburgC. (2011). Psychological distance and the dual role of price. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1086/659874
11.
BossonJ. K.MichniewiczK. S. (2013). Gender dichotomization at the level of ingroup identity: What it is, and why men use it more than women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033126
12.
BroniarczykS. M.AlbaJ. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379403100206
13.
BrowningN.GogoO.KimmelM. (2018). Comprehending CSR messages: Applying the elaboration likelihood model. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2017-0068
14.
BrowningN.YangS.-U.ParkY. E.LeeE.KimT. (2019). Do ethics matter? Investigating donor responses to primary and tertiary ethical violations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(4), 1145–1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019835903
15.
ChaikenS. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
16.
ChoiC. W. (2020). Increasing company-cause fit: The effects of a relational ad message and consumers’ cause involvement on attitude toward the CSR activity. International Journal of Advertising. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1822060
17.
ChoiW. J.WinterichK. P. (2013). Can brands move in from the outside? How moral identity enhances out-group brand attitude. Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 96–111. https://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0544
18.
ChungA.JiangH. (2017). Handling negative publicity: The influence of employing CSR communication in apology statements in reducing anger and negative word-of-mouth (NWOM). Journal of Communication Management, 21(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-11-2016-0091
19.
ChungS.LeeS. Y. (2019). Visual CSR messages and the effects of emotional valence and arousal on perceived CSR motives, attitude, and behavioral intentions. Communication Research, 46, 7926–7947. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216689161
20.
ChungS.LeeS. Y. (2020). Cognitive processing of corporate social responsibility campaign messages: The effects of emotional visuals on memory. Media Psychology, 23(2), 244–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1591999
DavidP.KlineS.DaiY. (2005). Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase intention: A dual-process model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(3), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1703_4
23.
DavidsonL. (2015, January12). Femvertising: Advertisers cash in on #feminism. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk
24.
DoddM. D.SupaD. W. (2015). Testing the viability of corporate social advocacy as a predictor of purchase intention. Communication Research Reports, 32(4), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1089853
25.
DoddM. D.SupaD. W. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring “corporate social advocacy” communication: Examining the impact on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 2–23.
26.
DuS.BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.01.001
27.
DuS.BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
28.
EscalasJ. E.BettmanJ. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 378–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/497549
GrauS. L.FolseJ. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367360402
31.
GuptaS.PirschJ. (2006). The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760610701850
32.
HajjatM. M. (2003). Effect of cause-related marketing on attitudes and purchase intentions: The moderating role of cause involvement and donation size. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 93–109. https://doi/org/10.1300/J054v11n01_07
33.
HamiltonK. (1981). A note on the observed diurnal and semidiurnal rainfall variations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 86(C12), 12122–12126. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v11n01_07
34.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
35.
Hernández-OrtegaB. (2018). Don’t believe strangers: Online consumer reviews and the role of social psychological distance. Information & Management, 55(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.03.007
36.
HoefflerS.KellerK. L. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.21.1.78.17600
37.
ICRW. (2016). The business case for women’s economic empowerment: An integrated approach.
38.
JoiremanJ.SmithD.LiuR. L.ArthursJ. (2015). It’s all good: Corporate social responsibility reduces negative and promotes positive responses to service failures among value-aligned customers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 34(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.13.065
39.
KentM. L.TaylorM. (2016). From Homo Economicus to Homo dialogicus: Rethinking social media use in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.003
40.
KimJ. K.OvertonH. K.BhallaN.LiJ.-Y. (2020). Nike, Colin Kaepernick, and the politicization of sports: Examining perceived organizational motives and public responses. Public Relations Review, 46, 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101856
41.
Koschate-FischerN.StefanI. V.HoyerW. D. (2012). Willingness to pay for cause-related marketing: The impact of donation amount and moderating effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 910–927. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0511
42.
Larrieta-Rubín de CelisI.Velasco-BalmasedaE.FernándezdeBobadillaS.Alonso-AlmeidaM. D. M.Intxaurburu-ClementeG. (2015). Does having women managers lead to increased gender equality practices in corporate social responsibility?Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12081
43.
LibermanN.TropeY. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
44.
LiiY. S.WuK. W.DingM. C. (2013). Doing good does good? Sustainable marketing of CSR and consumer evaluations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.294
45.
LimM.YangY. (2016). The effect of authenticity and social distance on CSR activity. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(3), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2014-0135
46.
MohrL. A.WebbD. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00006.x
47.
ParkJ.ChungT.-L.Hall-PhillipsA.AnazaN. A. (2016). Loyalty to social ventures in social media: The role of social cause involvement, identification, and commitment. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 28(3), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2015.1015378
48.
ParkY. E.DoddM. D. (2016). The historical development of corporate social responsibility as a strategic function of public relations. In BrunnerB. R. (Ed.), The moral compass of public relations (pp. 21–33). Routledge.
49.
ParkY. E.KangM. (2020). When crowdsourcing in CSR leads to dialogic communication: The effects of trust and distrust. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101867
PimpaN.PhouxayK. (2017). CSR and Women Empowerment: A comparative study of women in the mining community in Thailand and Lao PDR. Asean Journal of Management & Innovation, 4(2), 145–154. http://doi.org/10.14456/ajmi.2017.27
52.
PorterM. E.KramerM. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2016.410114
53.
ReevesB.GeigerS. (1994). Designing experiments that assess psychological responses to media messages. In LangA. (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media messages (pp.165–180). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54.
RobinsonS. R.IrmakC.JayachandranS. (2012). Choice of cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.09.0589
55.
RomaniS.GrappiS.BagozziR. P. (2013). Explaining consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: The role of gratitude and altruistic values. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1337-z
56.
RudmanL. A.GoodwinS. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494
57.
SenS.BhattacharyaC. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838
58.
SpearsN.SinghS. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
59.
SungK. K.TaoC. W. W.SlevitchL. (2020). Restaurant chain’s corporate social responsibility messages on social networking sites: The role of social distance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102429
60.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C.AustinW. G.WorchelS. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational Identity: A Reader, 56(65), 9780203505984.
61.
ThorsonE.WicksR. H.LeshnerG. (2012). Experimental methodology in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699011430066
62.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance.. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
63.
TropeY.LibermanN.WakslakC. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
64.
VargasP. T.DuffB. R.FaberR. J. (2017). A practical guide to experimental advertising research. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281779
65.
VoT. T.XiaoX.HoS. Y. (2019). How does corporate social responsibility engagement influence word of mouth on Twitter? Evidence from the airline industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3679-z
66.
WuS.-I.WangW.-H. (2014). Impact of CSR perception on brand image, brand attitude and buying willingness: A study of a global café. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(6), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v6n6p43
YooD.LeeJ. (2018). The effects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) fit and CSR consistency on company evaluation: The role of CSR support. Sustainability, 10(8), 2956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082956
69.
ZhaoY.WangL.TangH.ZhangY. (2020). Electronic word-of-mouth and consumer purchase intentions in social e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 41, 100980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100980
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
