The Moderating Role of Emotion: The Combinatory Effects of Positive Emotion and News Framing Techniques on Climate Change Attitudes

Abstract

Based on mood management theory and the broaden-and-build theory, this study examines whether an individual’s emotional state influences the persuasive efficacy of climate change news framing techniques. To test our hypothesis, we conducted a 2 (Message Framing: thematic vs. episodic) × 2 (Emotion: positive vs. control) between-subjects factorial design experiment. Results indicate that episodically framed messages significantly decrease news believability and risk perception for people in a positive emotional state. News believability and risk perception positively mediated the effects of emotion and message frame on policy support and behavioral intention.

Keywords

climate change emotion message frame news believability risk perception policy support pro-environmental behavior

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aarøe

(2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematic frames. Political Communication, 28(2), 207–226.

Attari

S. Z.

Krantz

D. H.

Weber

E. U.

(2016). Statements about climate researchers’ carbon footprints affect their credibility and the impact of their advice. Climatic Change, 138(1), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1713-2

Bertolotti

Catellani

(2014). Effects of message framing in policy communication on climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2033

Boykoff

M. T.

(2013). Public enemy no. 1? Understanding media representations of outlier views on climate change. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 796–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213476846

Bracken

C. C.

(2006). Perceived source credibility of local television news: The impact of television form and presence. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(4), 723–741.

Brantner

Lobinger

Wetzstein

(2011). Effects of visual framing on emotional responses and evaluations of news stories about the Gaza conflict 2009. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(3), 523–540.

Cappella

J. N.

Lerman

Romantan

Baruh

(2005). News about genetics and smoking: Priming, family smoking history, and news story believability on inferences of genetic susceptibility to tobacco addiction. Communication Research, 32(4), 478–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205277320

Chadwick

A. E.

(2015). Toward a theory of persuasive hope: Effects of cognitive appraisals, hope appeals, and hope in the context of climate change. Health Communication, 30(6), 598–611.

Clark

Iversen

S. D.

Goodwin

G. M.

(2001). The influence of positive and negative mood states on risk taking, verbal fluency, and salivary cortisol. Journal of Affective Disorders, 63, 179–187.

10.

Clore

G. L.

Huntsinger

J. R.

(2007). How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(9), 393–399.

11.

Coleman

Thorson

Wilkins

(2011). Testing the effect of framing and sourcing in health news stories. Journal of Health Communication, 16(9), 941–954.

12.

Dasgupta

DeSteno

Williams

L. A.

Hunsinger

(2009). Fanning the flames of prejudice: The influence of specific incidental emotions on implicit prejudice. Emotion, 9(4), 585–591.

13.

DeSteno

Petty

R. E.

Rucker

D. D.

Wegener

D. T.

Braverman

(2004). Discrete emotions and persuasion: The role of emotion-induced expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 43–56.

14.

Dillard

J. P.

Peck

(2001). Persuasion and the structure of affect. Dual systems and discrete emotions as complementary models. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 38–68.

15.

Dunlap

R. E.

(2008). The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From marginality to worldwide use. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18

16.

Dunlap

R. E.

McCright

A. M.

(2010). Climate change denial: Sources, actors and strategies. In Lever-Tracy

(Ed.), Routledge handbook of climate change and society (pp. 240–259). Routledge.

17.

Dunn

J. R.

Schweitzer

M. E.

(2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736–748.

18.

Engels

Hüther

Schäfer

Held

(2013). Public climate-change skepticism, energy preferences and political participation. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1018–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.008

19.

Escalas

J. E.

(2004). Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639163

20.

Forgas

J. P.

(1994). The role of emotion in social judgments: An introductory review and an Affect Infusion Model (AIM). European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 1–24.

21.

Forgas

J. P.

(1995). Mood and judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66.

22.

Fransson

Gärling

(1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 369–382.

23.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218

24.

Gasper

Clore

G. L.

(2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13(1), 34–40.

25.

Gerend

M. A.

Maner

J. K.

(2011). Fear, anger, fruits, and veggies: Interactive effects of emotion and message framing on health behavior. Health Psychology, 30(4), 420–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021981

26.

Griskevicius

Shiota

M. N.

Neufeld

S. L.

(2010). Influence of different positive emotions on persuasion processing: A functional evolutionary approach. Emotion, 10(2), 190–206.

27.

Gross

(2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x

28.

Haigh

M. M.

(2010). Newspapers use three frames to cover alternative energy. Newspaper Research Journal, 31(2), 47–62.

29.

Haigh

M. M.

Brubaker

P. J.

Heresco

(2009). The impact of mood and story frame on associative networks. American Journal of Media Psychology, 2(1–2), 57–75.

30.

Hart

P. S.

(2011). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33(1), 28–51.

31.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

32.

Wang

Pang

Guo

(2015). The effect of emotion and time pressure on risk decision-making. Journal of Risk Research, 18(5), 637–650.

33.

Iyengar

(1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992330

34.

Iyengar

(1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.

35.

Johnson

D. R.

(2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005

36.

Keen

(2006). A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14(3), 207–236. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2006.0015

37.

Laskin

A. V.

(2018). The third-person effects in the investment decision making: A case of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(3), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-10-2017-0099

38.

LeBlanc

V. R.

McConnell

M. M.

Monteiro

S. D.

(2015). Predictable chaos: A review of the effects of emotions on attention, memory and decision making. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(1), 265–282.

39.

Leiserowitz

(2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 45–72.

40.

Lerner

J. S.

Gonzalez

R. M.

Small

D. A.

Fischhoff

(2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14(2), 144–150.

41.

Lieske

D. J.

Wade

Roness

L. A.

(2014). Climate change awareness and strategies for communicating the risk of coastal flooding: A Canadian maritime case example. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 140, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.04.017

42.

Lin

W. B.

(2008). Investigation on the model of consumers’ perceived risk—Integrated viewpoint. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(2), 977–988.

43.

Major

L. H.

(2011). The mediating role of emotions in the relationship between frames and attribution of responsibility for health problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(3), 502–522.

44.

Major

L. H.

(2018). Mental health news: How frames influence support for policy and civic engagement intentions. Journal of Health Communication, 23(1), 52–60.

45.

Nabi

R. L.

(2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247.

46.

Nelson

T. E.

Clawson

R. A.

Oxley

Z. M.

(1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567–583.

47.

Nguyen

Noussair

C. N.

(2014). Risk aversion and emotions. Pacific Economic Review, 19(3), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12067

48.

Oliver

M. B.

Dillard

J. P.

Bae

Tamul

D. J.

(2012). The effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012439020

49.

Richins

M. L.

(1997). Measuring emotions in the consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 127–146.

50.

Sakaki

(2007). Mood and recall of autobiographical memory: The effect of focus of self-knowledge. Journal of Personality, 75(3), 421–450.

51.

Schmid-Petri

(2017). Politicization of science: How climate change skeptics use experts and scientific evidence in their online communication. Climatic Change, 145(3), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2112-z

52.

Schwarz

(2011). Feelings-as-information theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1, 289–308.

53.

Septianto

Northey

Dolan

(2019). The effects of political ideology and message framing on counterfeiting: The mediating role of emotions. Journal of Business Research, 99, 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.059

54.

Shaw

M. E. M. D. L.

Weaver

D. H.

Mc Combs

(1997). Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. Psychology Press.

55.

Smith

Leiserowitz

(2014). The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Analysis, 34(5), 937–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12140

56.

Springer

S. A.

Harwood

(2015). The influence of episodic and thematic frames on policy and group attitudes: Mediational analysis. Human Communication Research, 41(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12045

57.

van Laer

de Ruyter

Visconti

L. M.

Wetzels

. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1086/673383

58.

Velten

(1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6(4), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(68)90028-4

59.

Waters

E. A.

(2008). Feeling good, feeling bad, and feeling at-risk: A review of incidental affect’s influence on likelihood estimates of health hazards and life events. Journal of Risk Research, 11(5), 569–595.

60.

Watson

Wiese

Vaidya

Tellegen

(1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 820–838.

61.

(2018). When individual cultural orientation and mediated portrayal of risk intersect: Effects of individualism–collectivism and media framing on risk perception and attribution of responsibility. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(4), 499–509.

62.

Zillmann

(1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31(3), 327–340.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.58 MB