This article focuses on the changes in attitudes about sexuality, gender equality, and intimate partner violence within the context of modernization. Revised modernization theory predicts that increasing development leads to greater levels of egalitarian gender values and liberal sexual mores as part of a larger change in society. Our analysis leads to the conclusion that although both these sets of attitudes are a part of the movement towards postmaterialist values, in the context of intimate partner violence, different dynamics prevail at different levels of development. Using regression analysis and data from the fifth wave of the World Values Survey, we find a significant relationship between attitudes towards intimate partner violence, egalitarian gender values and liberal sexual mores. In general, liberal attitudes towards sexuality do not necessarily mean a lower tolerance for intimate partner violence. Crucially, the relationship between these three sets of values depends on the level of development. We find that in agrarian and industrial societies, higher levels of liberal sexual mores with lower levels of egalitarian gender values lead to a higher level of support for intimate partner violence against women.
AbramsonP. R.InglehartR. (1995). Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
2.
ArendtH. (1969). Speculations on violence. The New York Review of Books, 12(4).
3.
BellD. (1976). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books
4.
Bent-GoodleyT. B. (2005). Culture and domestic violence: Transforming knowledge development. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 195–203.
5.
BogradM. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In YlloK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11–28). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
6.
BoyA.KulczyckiA. (2008). What we know about intimate partner violence in the Middle East and North Africa. Violence Against Women, 14(2), 53–70.
7.
CarlsonR. G.JonesD. K. (2010). Continuum of conflict and control: A conceptualization of intimate partner violence typologies. The Family Journal, 18(3), 248–254.
8.
CountsD. A.BrownJ.CampbellJ. C. (Eds.) (1999). To have and to hit: Perspectives on the beating of wives. University of Illinois Press.
9.
DeKeseredyW.SchwartzM. D. (2002). Theorizing public housing woman abuse as a function of economic exclusion and male peer support, Women’s Health and Urban Life: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 1(2), 26–45.
10.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E. (1979). Violence against wives. A case against the patriarchy. New York: The Free Press.
11.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1998). Violent men and violent contexts. In DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 141–168). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
EllsbergM.HeiseL. (2005). Researching violence against women: A practical guide for researchers and activists. Washington, DC: World Health Organization.
13.
FanslowJ.RobinsonE.CrengleS.PereseL. (2010). Juxtaposing beliefs and reality: Prevalence rates of intimate partner violence and attitudes to violence and gender roles reported by New Zealand women. Violence Against Women, 16(7), 812–831.
14.
FrankJ.MceneaneyE. H. (1999). The individualism and the liberalization of state policies on same-sex sexual relations, 1984–1995. Social Forces, 77(3), 911–943.
15.
FloodM.PeaseB. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 10(2), 125–142.
16.
General Assembly of the United Nation. (1993). Declaration on the elimination of violence against woman. General Assembly resolution 48/104 of 20 December 1993.
17.
GerhardsJ.SchäferM. S.KämpferS. (2009). Gender equality in the European Union: The EU script and its support by European citizens. Sociology, 43(3), 515–534.
18.
GillumT. L. (2002). Exploring the link between stereotypic images and intimate partner violence in the African American community. Violence Against Women, 8(1), 64–86.
19.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2000). Wife abuse and battering in the sociocultural context of Arab society”. Family Process, 39(2), 237–255.
20.
HallidayJ.LucasA. (2010). Economic factors and relationship quality among young couples: Comparing cohabitation and marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1141–1154.
21.
HayesB. C.McAllisterI.StudlarD. (2000). Gender, postmaterialism, and feminism in comparative perspective”. International Political Review, 21(4), 425–439.
22.
HeiseL. L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3), 262–290.
23.
InglehartR. (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. The American Political Science Review, 65(4), 991–1017.
24.
InglehartR. (1977). The silent revolution. New Jersey: Princeton University Press
25.
InglehartR.BasáñezM.MorenoA. (1998). Human values and beliefs. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
26.
InglehartR. (1999). Postmodernization erodes respect for authority, but increases support for democracy”, in NorrisP. (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 236–257). New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
InglehartR.BakerW. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.
28.
InglehartR.FoaR.PetersonC.WelzelC. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285.
29.
InglehartR.NorrisP.WelzelC. (2002). Gender equality and democracy. Comparative Sociology, 25(3–4), 321–345
30.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2003a). The true clash of civilizations. Foreign Policy, 135, 62–70.
32.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2005). Modernity and modernization revisited: A response to Adams and Orloff. Politics and Gender, 1, 482–492.
33.
InglehartR.WelzelC. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
JohnsonM. P.FerraroK. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990’s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963.
35.
JohnsonH.OllusN.NevalaS. (2008). Violence against women: An international perspective. New York: Springer.
36.
KayaY.CookK. J. (2010). A cross-national analysis of physical intimate partner violence against women. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 51(6), 423–444.
37.
KlevensJ. (2007). An overview of intimate partner violence among Latinos. Violence Against Women, 13(2), 111–122.
38.
MasonR.HymanI.BermanH.GurugeS.KanagaratnamP.ManuelL. (2008). ‘Violence is an international language’: Tamil women’s perceptions of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 14(12), 1397–1412.
39.
McDonaghE. (2002). Political citizenship and democratization: The gender paradox. The American Political Science Review, 96(3), 535–552.
40.
MillettK. (1971). Sexual politics. New York: Avon.
41.
NorrisP. (1987). Politics and sexual equality: The comparative position of women in western democracies. Boulder, CO: Rienner.
42.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2002). Islamic culture and democracy: Testing the ‘Clash of Civilizations’ thesis, Comparative Sociology, 1(3–4), 235–263.
43.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2009). Cosmopolitan communications: Cultural diversity in a globalized world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
RajA.SilvermanJ. (2002). Violence against immigrant women: The roles of culture, context, and legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 8(3), 367–389.
45.
RennisonC. M.PlantyM. (2003). Nonlethal intimate partner violence: Examining race, gender and income patterns. Violence and Victims, 18, 433–443.
46.
RodriguezP. (2011). Feminism and violence: The hegemonic second wave’s encounter with rape and domestic abuse in USA (1970–1985). Cultural Dynamics, 23(3), 147–173.
47.
SaundersD. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat?: A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. In YllöK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 90–113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
SchumanH.JohnsonM. P. (1976). Attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 161–207.
49.
SchwendingerJ. R.SchwendingerH. (1983). Rape and inequality. Beverly Hill: Sage Publications.
50.
SokoloffN.PrattC. (Eds.). (2005). Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender, and culture. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
51.
SokoloffN.DupontI. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11(1), 38–64.
52.
SorensonS. B. (1996). Violence against women: Examining ethnic differences and commonalities. Evaluation Review, 20(2), 123–146.
53.
SteinmetzS. K. (1978). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology, 2(3–4), 499–509.
54.
StithS. M.SmithD. B.PennC. E.WardD. B.TrittD. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 65–98.
55.
StrausM. (1976). Sexual inequality, cultural norms, and wife beating. In VianoE. C. (Ed.), Victims and Society (pp. 543–557). Washington D.C.: Visage Press.
56.
StrausM. A. (1978). Wife beating: How common and why?Victimology, 2(3–4), 443–458.
57.
StrausM. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(1), 75–88.
58.
StrausM. (1990). The national family violence surveys. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 3–14). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
59.
SolokoffN. J.DupontI. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender. Violence against Women, 11(1), 38–64.
60.
SugarmanD. B.FrankelS. L. (1996). Patriarchal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 11(1), 13–40
61.
WalkerL. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper and Row.
62.
WelzelC.InglehartR. (2007). Political regimes and transitions. In BoixC.Stokesand S. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 295–316).
WestC. M. (2004). Black women and intimate partner violence: New directions for research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1487–1493.
65.
World Values Survey 1981–2008 Official aggregate v.20090901, 2009. World Values Survey Association (www.worldvaluessurvey.org). Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid.
66.
YlloK. (1988). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. In YlloK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 28–50). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
