Autonomy for women and their well-being are significant issues to understand because the development of society depends heavily on women’s participation. Autonomy for women is conceptualized as one of the essential components of well-being. The research aimed to explore the meaning of autonomy for women, the changes in their lives through autonomy, and its impact on their well-being. Thirty-eight married women (18 working women and 20 non-working women), whose ages ranged from 28 to 40 years, were selected through purposive sampling. Participants were selected from Allahabad City and belonged to middle-class socio-economic status. Thematic analysis was done to analyze the data. The dialogue between the researcher and the respondents evolved around the themes that emerged from the data extraction. Three main themes, namely the sense of autonomy, the changes in the lives of women through autonomy, and psychological well-being, developed from examining the meaning of autonomy, its impact, and its consequences. A sense of autonomy was found to be understood by women as a sense of liberty and uninterrupted personal and professional life. Changes in life through autonomy were found to include inner satisfaction or gratification and self-identity. At the same time, psychosocial well-being was found to include self-efficacy, self-concept or self-esteem, and social well-being. The themes and subthemes were further discussed in the article.
AcharyaD. R., BellJ. S., SimkhadaP., van TeijlingenE. R., & RegmiP. R. (2010). Women’s autonomy in household decision-making: A demographic study in Nepal. Reproductive Health, 7, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-7-15
2.
APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2023). https://dictionary.apa.org/well-being
3.
AthanasiosK. (2007). Grade and gender differences in students’ self-determination for participating in physical education. Education Sciences and Psychology, 11(2), 23–30.
4.
BanduraA. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Health, 13(4), 623–649.
5.
BetzN. E., & FitzgeraldL. F. (1987). The career psychology of women. Academic Press.
6.
ChakrabartiA. (2019). Understanding female autonomy in India through their family headship status. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 27(3), 266–285.
7.
ChenB., VansteenkisteM., BeyersW., BooneL., DeciE. L., Van der Kaap-DeederJ., DuriezB., LensW., MatosL., MouratidisA., RyanR. M., SheldonK. M., SoenensB., Van PetegemS., & VerstuyfJ. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 216–236.
8.
ChirkovV. I., RyanR., & SheldonK. M. (Eds.). (2010). Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.
9.
DasguptaA., MenonJ., & SharmaN. (2021). Women’s autonomy and mental health in India: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1816.
10.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.
11.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.
12.
DysonT., & MooreM. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9, 35–60.
13.
FuchsV. R. (1989). Women’s quest for economic equality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(1), 25–41.
14.
GhumanS. J. (2003). Women’s autonomy and child survival: A comparison of Muslims and non-Muslims in four Asian countries. Demography, 40(3), 419–436.
15.
HakimA., SalwayS., & MumtazZ. (2003). Women’s autonomy and uptake of contraception in Pakistan. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 18(1), 63–82.
16.
JejeebhoyS. J. (1995). Women’s education, autonomy, and reproductive behavior: Experience from developing countries. OUP Catalogue.
17.
JejeebhoyS. J. (1996). Women’s education, autonomy and reproductive behavior: Assessing what we have learned. Program on Population, East-West Center.
18.
JejeebhoyS. J., & SatharZ. A. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 687–712. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2695183
19.
JudgeT. A., & BonoJ. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—Self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80.
20.
KabeerN.(2005). Jumping to conclusions? Struggles over meaning and method in the study of household economics: Struggles over meaning and method in the study of household economics Naila Kabeer. In KabeerN. (Ed.), Feminist visions of development (pp. 100–116). Routledge.
21.
KantI. (1870). Grundlegung zur metaphysik der sitten (Vol. 28). L. Heimann.
22.
KumarC. (2020). Psychosocial well-being of individuals. In Leal FilhoW., AzulA. M., BrandliL., ÖzuyarP. G., & WallT. (Eds.), Quality education. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95870-5_45
23.
LarsonL. M., AndersenM. A., TavassolieT., & JohnsonA. K. (2020). Autonomy and well-being: Examining the relationship between financial resources, educational attainment, and life satisfaction among women in the United States. Journal of Women & Aging, 32(4), 357–369.
24.
LauderdaleM. E., Yli-PiipariS., IrwinC. C., & LayneT. E. (2015). Gender differences regarding motivation for physical activity among college students: A self-determination approach. The Physical Educator, 72(5), 153–172.
25.
MahadevanK., AghajanianA., JayasreeR., & MoniG. S. (1989). Status of women and population dynamics: A conceptual model. In Women and population women dynamics: Perspectives from Asian countries (pp. 345–379). Sage Publications.
26.
MalkinC., & StakeJ. E. (2004). Changes in attitudes and self-confidence in the women’s and gender studies classroom: The role of teacher alliance and student cohesion. Sex Roles, 50, 455–468.
27.
MasonK. O. (1984). The status of women: A review of its relationship to fertility and mortality. The Rockefeller Press.
28.
MoleiroC., RatinhoI., & BernardesS. (2017). Autonomy-connectedness in collectivistic cultures: An exploratory cross-cultural study among Portuguese natives, Cape-Verdean and Chinese people residing in Portugal. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 23–28.
29.
ObermeyerC. M. (1992). Islam, women, and politics: The demography of Arab countries. Population and Development Review, 18, 33–60.
30.
OrkibiH., & RonenT. (2017). Basic psychological needs satisfaction mediates the association between self-control skills and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 936.
31.
RiveroE. (2018). Intergenerational time transfers and their contribution to Mexico’s economy in 2014. DPRU, University of Cape Town.
32.
RyanR. M., & ConnellJ. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749.
33.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
34.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.
35.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2006). Self‐regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self‐determination, and will?Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1586.
36.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
37.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
38.
RyffC. D. (2018). Well-being with soul: Science in pursuit of human potential. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 242–248.
39.
RyffC. D. (2019). Entrepreneurship and eudaimonic well-being: Five venues for new science. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(4), 646–663.
40.
Safilios-RothschildC. (1982). Female power, autonomy and demographic change in the third world. In AnkerR., BuvinicM., & YoussefN. (Eds.), Women’s roles and population trends in the third world. ILO.
41.
SahaS., BhattacharyaS., & DasN. (2021). Autonomy, empowerment and intimate partner violence among married women in India. Journal of Family Violence, 36, 135–148.
42.
SatharZ., CallumC., & JejeebhoyS. (2001). Gender, region, religion and reproductive behaviour in India and Pakistan. In 24th IUSSP General Population Conference, Salvador, Brazil iussp. org/Brazil2001/s80/S87_03_sathar.pdf.
43.
SenA. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
44.
SibekoS., NdunaM., & ConnollyC. (2020). Autonomy, relationships and well-being among South African women. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(7), 2617–2637.
45.
SiddhantaS., SahooS. K., & SwainS. (2022). Women’s autonomy and maternal health outcomes in India: A systematic review. Journal of Biosocial Science, 54(1), 121–136.
46.
SinhaN., VenkateshS., & SubramanianS. V. (2021). Women’s Autonomy and Reproductive Health Outcomes in India. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 25(8), 1295–1304.
47.
Sulimani-AidanY. (2016). In between formal and informal: Staff and youth relationships in care and after leaving care. Children and Youth Services Review, 67, 43–49.
48.
University of Utah College of Nursing (UUCN). (n.d.). What is qualitative research?[Guide]https://nursing.utah.edu/research/qualitative-research/what-is-qualitative-research.php#what / (https://libguides.uta.edu/quantitative_and_qualitative_research).
49.
WeinsteinN., PrzybylskiA. K., & RyanR. M. (2012). The index of autonomous functioning: Development of a scale of human autonomy. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(4), 397–413.
50.
YoderJ. D., SnellA. F., & TobiasA. (2012). Balancing multicultural competence with social justice: Feminist beliefs and optimal psychological functioning. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(8), 1101–1132.
51.
ZeyE., & WindmannS. (2022). Grassroots autonomy: A laypersons’ perspective on autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1588.
