What factors shape attitudes toward immigration? Previous studies have typically debated whether citizens oppose immigration more for economic or cultural reasons. We broaden this debate by exploring how different segments of the citizenry feel about immigration. Our original surveys conducted in Japan reveal two separate axes along which many citizens view immigration: (1) its cultural and economic effects, and (2) its positive and negative effects. Even in Japan, whose relatively closed policy toward immigration is conventionally believed to reflect widespread public intolerance of outsiders, over 60 percent of our respondents favor widening the doors to immigrants for economic or cultural reasons or both.
AllportGordon W.1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Ballard-RosaCameronMartinLucyScheveKenneth. 2017. “The Structure of American Income Tax Policy Preferences.” The Journal of Politics79 (1): 1–16.
3.
BansakKirkHainmuellerJensHangartnerDominik. 2016. “How Economic, Humanitarian and Religious Concerns Shape European Attitudes toward Asylum Seekers.” Science354 (2147): 1–10.
4.
BoydMonicaThomasDerrick. 2002. “Skilled Immigrant Labour: Country of Origin and the Occupational Locations of Male Engineers.” Canadian Studies in Population29 (1): 71–99.
5.
BurgoonBrianRooduijnMatthijs. 2021. “‘Immigrationization’ of Welfare Politics? Anti-immigration and Welfare Attitudes in Context.” West European Politics44:177–203.
6.
BurscherBjornvan SpanjeJoostde VreeseClaes H.2015. “Owning the Issues of Crime and Immigration: The Relation between Immigration and Crime News and Anti-immigrant Voting in 11 Countries.” Electoral Studies38:59–69.
7.
CardDavidDustmannChristianPrestonIan. 2012. “Immigration, Wages, and Compositional Amenities.” Journal of the European Economic Association10 (1): 78–119.
8.
CitrinJackGreenDonald P.MusteChristopherWongCara. 1997. “Public Opinion toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” Journal of Politics59 (3): 858–81.
9.
ClaytonKatherineFerwerdaJeremyHoriuchiYusaku. 2019. “Exposure to Immigration and Admission Preferences: Evidence from France.” Political Behavior. Published electronically May 14. doi:10.1007/s11109-019-09550-z.
10.
DancygierRafaela M.2010. Immigration and Conflict in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
DancygierRafaela M.DonnellyMichael J.2013. “Sectoral Economies, Economic Contexts, and Attitudes toward Immigration.” Journal of Politics75 (1): 17–35.
12.
DustmannChristianPrestonIan. 2006. “Is Immigration Good or Bad for the Economy? Analysis of Attitudinal Responses.” In Solomon W. Polachek, Carmel Chiswick, and Hillel Rapoport, eds. The Economics of Immigration and Social Diversity, 3–34. Emerald Group.
13.
GerberAlan S.HuberGregory A.BiggersDaniel R.HendryDavid J.2017. “Self-Interest, Beliefs, and Policy Opinions: Understanding How Economic Beliefs Affect Immigration Policy Preferences.” Political Research Quarterly70:155–71.
14.
GoldsteinJudith L.PetersMargaret E.2014. “Nativism or Economic Threat: Attitudes toward Immigrants during the Great Recession.” International Interactions40 (3): 376–401.
15.
GonsalkoraleKarenShermanJeffrey W.KlauerKarl Christoph. 2009. “Aging and Prejudice: Diminished Regulation of Automatic Race Bias among Older Adults.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45 (2): 410–14.
16.
GreenDavid. 2017. “Immigrant Perception in Japan: A Multilevel Analysis of Public Opinion.” Asian Survey57 (2): 368–94.
17.
HainmuellerJensHiscoxMichael J.2006. “Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes toward International Trade.” International Organization60 (2): 469–98.
18.
HainmuellerJensHiscoxMichael J.2007. “Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe.” International Organization61 (2): 399–442.
19.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.2014. “Public Attitudes toward Immigration.” Annual Review of Political Science17:225–49.
20.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.2015. “The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants.” American Journal of Political Science59 (3): 529–48.
21.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.YamamotoTeppei. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis22 (1): 1–30.
22.
HansonGordon H.ScheveKenneth F.SlaughterMatthew J.2006. “Public Finance and Individual Preferences over Globalization Strategies.” Economics & Politics19 (1): 1–33.
23.
HetheringtonMarc J.2009. “Putting Polarization in Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science39 (2): 413–48.
24.
HetheringtonMarc J.WeilerJonathan D.2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HiraiMika. 1999. “‘Nihonjin-rashisa’ nitsuiteno Stereotype [Stereotypes about the Japanese].” Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology38 (2): 5103–13.
26.
HjermMikael. 2009. “Anti-immigrant Attitudes and Cross-Municipal Variation in the Proportion of Immigrants.” Acta Sociologica52 (1): 47–62.
27.
HopkinsDaniel P.2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review104 (1): 40–60.
28.
HoriuchiYusakuSmithDaniel M.YamamotoTeppei. 2018. “Measuring Voters’ Multidimensional Policy Preferences with Conjoint Analysis: Application to Japan’s 2014 Election.” Political Analysis26 (2): 190–209.
29.
IyengarShantoJackmanSimonMessingSolomonValentinoNicholasAalbergTorilDuchRaymondHahnKyu S.SorokaStuartHarellAllisonKobayashiTetsuro. 2013. “Do Attitudes about Immigration Predict Willingness to Admit Individual Immigrants? A Cross-National Test of the Person-Positivity Bias.” Public Opinion Quarterly77 (3): 641–65.
30.
Japan International Corporation of Welfare Services. n.d. “Heisei 30-nendo EPAni Mo- tozuku Gaikokujin Kangoshi Kaigo Fukushishi Ukreire Panfuretto [Guidelines for Admitting Nurses and Care Workers Based on the Economic Partnership Agreement, FY2018].” https://jicwels.or.jp/files/EPA_H30_pamph-r.pdf.
KageRiekoRosenbluthFrancesTanakaSeiki. 2019. “What Explains Low Female Political Representation? Evidence from Survey Experiments in Japan.” Politics and Gender15 (2): 285–309.
33.
KalickiKonrad. 2019. “Security Fears and Bureaucratic Rivalry: Admitting Foreign Labor in Japan and Taiwan.” Comparative Politics51 (4): 603–24.
34.
KaufmannEric. 2014. “‘It’s the Demography, Stupid’: Ethnic Change and Opposition to Immigration.” The Political Quarterly85 (3): 267–76.
35.
KaufmannEric. 2017. “Levels or Changes? Ethnic Context, Immigration and the UK Independence Party Vote.” Electoral Studies48:57–69.
36.
KehrbergJason E.2007. “Public Opinion on Immigration in Western Europe: Economics, Tolerance, and Exposure.” Comparative European Politics5 (3): 264–81.
37.
KinderDonald R.KamCindy D.2009. Us against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
KobayashiTetsuroColletChristianIyengarShantoHahnKyu S.2015. “Who Deserves Citizenship? An Experimental Study of Japanese Attitudes toward Immigrant Workers.” Social Science Japan Journal18 (1): 3–22.
39.
KojimaHiroshi. 1996. “The Determinants of Attitudes towards Population Aging in Japan.” Journal of Population Problems52 (2): 1–16.
40.
LeeperThomas J.HoboltSaraTilleyJames. 2019. “Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis28:1–15.
41.
MalhotraNeilMargalitYotamMoCecilia Hyunjung. 2013. “Economic Explanations for Opposition to Immigration: Distinguishing between Prevalence and Conditional Impact.” American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 391–410.
42.
MaydaAnna Marie. 2006. “Who Is against Immigration? A Cross-Country Investigation of Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants.” Review of Economics and Statistics88 (3): 510–13.
43.
MazumiYosuke. 2015. “Shoshi Koreika Jidaino Nihonni okeru Gaikokujin Rodosha Ukeire Ishikiwo Kiteisuru Yoin [What Shapes Public Opinion toward Foreign Workers in the Era of the Aging of Population in Japan].” Nihonban Sogoteki Shakai Chosa Kyodo Kenkyu Kyoten Ronbunshu 15 [JGSS Research Series] 12:51–61.
44.
MewesJanMauSteffen. 2013. “Globalization, Socio-economic Status and Welfare Chauvinism: European Perspectives on Attitudes toward the Exclusion of Immigrants.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology54 (3): 228–45.
45.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. n.d. “Indonesia-jin Kangoshi Kaigo Fukushishi Kohosha Reiwa Gannendo Ukeire Sukimu [Scheme for Accepting Indonesian Nurses and Care Workers].” https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/11650000/000595211.pdf.
46.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2016a. “Gaikokujin Koyo Jokyo no Todokede Jokyo [Status of Reporting on the Employment of Foreign Workers by Employers].”https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/0000148933.html.
MutzDiana C.MondakJeffery J.2006. “The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse.” The Journal of Politics68 (1): 140–55.
51.
NewmanBenjamin J.2013. “Acculturating Contexts and Anglo Opposition to Immigration in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 374–90.
52.
NewmanBenjamin J.HartmanTodd K.TaberCharles S.2012. “Foreign Language Exposure, Cultural Threat, and Opposition to Immigration.” Political Psychology33 (5): 635–57.
53.
NewmanBenjamin J.VelezYamilHartmanTodd K.BankertAlexa. 2013. “Are Citizens ‘Receiving the Treatment’? Assessing a Key Link in Contextual Theories of Public Opinion and Political Behavior.” Political Psychology36 (1): 123–31.
OishiNana. 2020. “Skilled or Unskilled? The Reconfiguration of Migration Policies in Japan.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. Published electronically March. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1731984.
56.
O’RourkeKevin H.SinnottRichard. 2006. “The Determinants of Individual Attitudes towards Immigration.” European Journal of Political Economy22 (4): 838–61.
57.
PetersMargaret E.2017. Trading Barriers: Immigration and the Remaking of Globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
58.
PettigrewThomas F.TroppLinda R.2006. “A Meta-analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90 (5): 751–83.
59.
PichlerFlorian. 2010. “Foundations of Anti-immigrant Sentiment: The Variable Nature of Perceived Group Threat across Changing European Societies, 2002-2006.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology51 (6): 445–69.
60.
RicheySean. 2010. “The Impact of Anti-assimilationist Beliefs on Attitudes toward Immigration.” International Studies Quarterly54 (1): 197–212.
61.
RobertsGlenda S.2017. “An Immigration Policy by Any Other Name: Semantics of Immigration to Japan.” Social Science Japan Journal21 (1): 89–102.
62.
RuedaDavidStegmuellerDaniel. 2016. “The Externalities of Inequality: Fear of Crime and Preferences for Redistribution in Western Europe.” American Journal of Political Science60 (2): 472–89.
63.
RydgrenJens. 2008. “Immigration Sceptics, Xenophobes or Racists? Radical Right-Wing Voting in Six West European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research47 (6): 737–65.
64.
ScheveKenneth F.SlaughterMatthew J.2001a. Globalization and the Perceptions of American Worker. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
65.
ScheveKenneth F.SlaughterMatthew J.2001b. “Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences over Immigration Policy.” Review of Economics and Statistics83 (1): 133–45.
66.
SidesJohnCitrinJack. 2007a. “European Opinion about Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information.” British Journal of Political Science37 (3): 477–504.
SnidermanPaul M.HagendoornLoukPriorMarkus. 2004. “Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities.” American Political Science Review98 (1): 35–49.
Somusho Tokeikyoku [Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications]. 2010. “Heisei 22-nendo Kokusei Chosa [Population Census, 2010].” https://www.stat.go.jp/data/kokusei/2010/#kekkagai.
71.
StrauszMichael. 2019. Help (Not) Wanted: Immigration Politics in Japan. Albany: State University of New York Press.
72.
TakenakaYoshihiko. 2014. “Hokaku Ideorogiino Eikyoryoku Teikato Nenrei [The Impact of Age on De-ideologization of Japanese Voters].” Senkyo Kenkyu30 (2): 5–18.
73.
TanakaSeikiRosenbluthFrances M.KageRieko. 2018. “Gaikokujin Rodoshani Taisuru Taido: Conjointo Jikken niyoru Bunseki [What Explains Attitudes towards Immigrants? Evidence from a Conjoint Survey Experiment in Japan].” Leviathan62: 71–95.
74.
TeeleDawnKallaJoshuaRosenbluthFrances McCall. 2018. “The Ties that Double Bind: Social Roles and Women’s Underrepresentation in Politics.” American Political Science Review112 (3): 525–41.
75.
Von HippelWilliamSilverLisa A.LynchMolly E.2000. “Stereotyping against Your Will: The Role of Inhibitory Ability in Stereotyping and Prejudice among the Elderly.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26 (5): 523–32.
76.
WilkesRimaGuppyNeilFarrisLily. 2008. “‘No Thanks, We’re Full’: Individual Characteristics, National Context, and Changing Attitudes toward Immigration.” International Migration Review42 (2): 302–32.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
