Immigrants’ economic progress, on the one hand, serves as an indicator of successful integration and should serve to mitigate natives’ concerns about potential economic or welfare state–related burdens of immigration. On the other hand, the fact of immigrants improving their social status may also induce perceptions of competition and group-related relative deprivation. This study examines whether immigrants’ progress leads either to improved attitudes toward immigrants or to a greater perception of immigration-related threat. Specifically, I focus on how individuals’ egalitarian values and experiences in intergroup contact condition their responses to immigrants’ economic progress. Using data from the European Social Survey 2014, combined with country-level change scores in income gaps between natives and immigrants, I find that respondents who encountered negative experiences in intergroup contact respond to immigrants’ progress with increasing anti-immigrant sentiment. A survey experiment manipulating exposure to information about group-specific income trends mirrors this finding. The results have important implications for debates about immigrants’ integration and the economic motives underlying immigration-related attitudes.
AalbergTIyengarSMessingS (2012) Who Is a “Deserving” Immigrant? An Experimental Study of Norwegian Attitudes. Scandinavian Political Studies35 (2): 97–116.
2.
AlesinaAGlaeserE (2004) Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
AllportGW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Basic Books.
4.
BansakKHainmuellerJHangartnerD (2016) How Economic, Humanitarian, and Religious Concerns Shape European Attitudes toward Asylum Seekers. Science354: 217–222.
5.
BarlowFKPaoliniSPedersenA, et al. (2012) The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin38 (12): 1629–1643.
6.
BishinBGHayesTJIncantalupoMB, et al. (2016) Opinion Backlash and Public Attitudes: Are Political Advances in Gay Rights Counterproductive?American Journal of Political Science60 (3): 625–648.
7.
BlalockHMJr (1967) Toward a Theory of Minority-group Relations. New York: Capricorn Books.
8.
BleichEBloemraadIGraauwE, et al. (2015) Migrants, Minorities and the Media: Information, Representations and Participation in the Public Sphere. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41 (6): 857–873.
9.
BlumerH (1958) Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position. Pacific Sociological Review1 (1): 3–7.
10.
BoboLD (1999) Prejudice as Group Position: Microfoundations of a Sociological Approach to Racism and Race Relations. Journal of Social Issues55 (3): 445–472.
11.
BoisjolyJDuncanGJKremerM, et al. (2006) Empathy or Antipathy? The Impact of Diversity. American Economic Review96 (5): 1890–1905.
12.
BurgoonB (2014) Immigration, Integration, and Support for Redistribution in Europe. World Politics66 (3): 365–405.
13.
CzymaraCSSchmidt-CatranAW (2017) Refugees Unwelcome? Changes in the Public Acceptance of Immigrants and Refugees in Germany in the Course of Europe’s “Immigration Crisis.”European Sociological Review33 (6): 735–751.
14.
DancygierRMDonnellyMJ (2013) Sectoral Economies, Economic Contexts, and Attitudes toward Immigration. The Journal of Politics75 (1): 17–35.
15.
DinasEMatakosKXefterisD, et al. (2019) Waking Up the Golden Dawn: Does Exposure to the Refugee Crisis Increase Support for Extreme-Right Parties?Political Analysis27 (2): 244–254.
16.
EssesVMHamiltonLKGaucherD (2017) The Global Refugee Crisis: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications for Improving Public Attitudes and Facilitating Refugee Resettlement. Social Issues and Policy Review11 (1): 78–123.
17.
EssesVMJacksonLMArmstrongTL (1998) Intergroup Competition and Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Immigration: An Instrumental Model of Group Conflict. Journal of Social Issues54 (4): 699–724.
18.
Eurostat (2015) European Commission, 2014 Release of Anonymised EU LFS Microdata. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
19.
FacchiniGMaydaAM (2012) Individual Attitudes towards Skilled Migration: An Empirical Analysis across Countries. The World Economy35 (2): 183–196.
20.
FeldmanSHuddyLWronskiJ, et al. (2020) The Interplay of Empathy and Individualism in Support for Social Welfare Policies. Political Psychology41 (2): 343–362.
21.
FetzerJS (2000) Public Attitudes toward Immigration in the United States, France, and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
FinseraasHKotsadamA (2017) Does Personal Contact with Ethnic Minorities Affect Anti-Immigrant Sentiments? Evidence from a Field Experiment. European Journal of Political Research56 (3): 703–722.
23.
FinseraasHHansonTJohnsenÅA, et al. (2019) Trust, Ethnic Diversity, and Personal Contact: A Field Experiment. Journal of Public Economics173: 72–84.
24.
GerberASHuberGABiggersDR, et al. (2017) Self-Interest, Beliefs, and Policy Opinions: Understanding How Economic Beliefs Affect Immigration Policy Preferences. Political Research Quarterly70 (1): 155–171.
25.
GidronNHallPA (2017) The Politics of Social Status: Economic and Cultural Roots of the Populist Right. The British Journal of Sociology68: S57–S84.
26.
GidronNHallPA (2020) Populism as a Problem of Social Integration. Comparative Political Studies53 (7): 1027–1059.
27.
HainmuellerJHiscoxMJ (2010) Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-Skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. American Political Science Review104 (1): 61–84.
28.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJ (2014) Public Attitudes toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science17: 225–249.
29.
HallaMWagnerAFZweimüllerJ (2017) Immigration and Voting for the Far Right. Journal of the European Economic Association15 (6): 1341–1385.
30.
HansonGHScheveKSlaughterMJ (2007) Public Finance and Individual Preferences over Globalization Strategies. Economics & Politics19 (1): 1–33.
31.
HeisigJPSchaefferM (2019) Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction. European Sociological Review35 (2): 258–279.
32.
HerdaD (2015) Beyond Innumeracy: Heuristic Decision-Making and Qualitative Misperceptions about Immigrants in Finland. Ethnic and Racial Studies38 (9): 1627–1645.
33.
HewstoneMSchmidK (2014) Neighbourhood Ethnic Diversity and Orientations toward Muslims in Britain: The Role of Intergroup Contact. The Political Quarterly85 (3): 320–325.
34.
HewstoneMCairnsEVociA, et al. (2006) Intergroup Contact, Forgiveness, and Experience of “The Troubles” in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues62 (1): 99–120.
35.
HoAKSidaniusJPrattoF, et al. (2012) Social Dominance Orientation: Revisiting the Structure and Function of a Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin38 (5): 583–606.
36.
HoboltSB (2016) The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent. Journal of European Public Policy23 (9): 1259–1277.
37.
HopkinsDJ (2015) The Upside of Accents: Language, Inter-Group Difference, and Attitudes toward Immigration. British Journal of Political Science45 (3): 531–557.
38.
KurerT (2020) The Declining Middle: Occupational Change, Social Status, and the Populist Right. Comparative Political Studies53: 1798–1835.
MacDonaldD (2020) Political Trust and Support for Immigration in the American Mass Public. British Journal of Political Science. Epub ahead of print 17March. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123419000668.
41.
McLarenLM (2015) Immigration and Perceptions of National Political Systems in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
MalhotraNMargalitYMoCH (2013) Economic Explanations for Opposition to Immigration: Distinguishing between Prevalence and Conditional Impact. American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 391–410.
43.
MatejskovaTLeitnerH (2011) Urban Encounters with Difference: The Contact Hypothesis and Immigrant Integration Projects in Eastern Berlin. Social & Cultural Geography12 (7): 717–741.
44.
MeulemanBAbtsKSchmidtP, et al. (2020) Economic Conditions, Group Relative Deprivation and Ethnic Threat Perceptions: A Cross-National Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies46 (3): 593–611.
45.
MeulemanBDavidovEBillietJ (2009) Changing Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: A Dynamic Group Conflict Theory Approach. Social Science Research38 (2): 352–365.
46.
MullinixKJLeeperTJDruckmanJN, et al. (2015) The Generalizability of Survey Experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science2 (2): 109–138.
47.
NewmanBJ (2013) Acculturating Contexts and Anglo Opposition to Immigration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 374–390.
48.
NewmanBJHartmanTKLownPL, et al. (2015) Easing the Heavy Hand: Humanitarian Concern, Empathy, and Opinion on Immigration. British Journal of Political Science45 (3): 583–607.
49.
NorrisPInglehartR (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
PaluckELGreenSAGreenDP (2019) The Contact Hypothesis Re-Evaluated. Behavioural Public Policy3 (2): 129–158.
51.
PaoliniSHarwoodJRubinM, et al. (2014) Positive and Extensive Intergroup Contact in the Past Buffers against the Disproportionate Impact of Negative Contact in the Present. European Journal of Social Psychology44 (6): 548–562.
52.
Pardos-PradoSXenaC (2019) Skill Specificity and Attitudes toward Immigration. American Journal of Political Science63 (2): 286–304.
53.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2006) A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90 (5): 751.
54.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2008) How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology38 (6): 922–934.
55.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2011) When Groups Meet: The Dynamics of Intergroup Contact. New York: Psychology Press.
56.
QuillianL (1995) Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review60 (4): 586–611.
57.
Schmidt-CatranAWSpiesDC (2016) Immigration and Welfare Support in Germany. American Sociological Review81 (2): 242–261.
58.
SchwartzSH (1992) Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology25 (1): 1–65.
59.
SherifMHarveyOJHoodWR, et al. (1961) The Robbers Cave Experiment: Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
60.
ShnabelNDovidioJFLevinZ (2016) But It’s My Right! Framing Effects on Support for Empowering Policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology63: 36–49.
61.
SidaniusJPrattoF (1999) Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SmithHJPettigrewTFPippinGM, et al. (2012) Relative Deprivation: A Theoretical and Meta-Analytic Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review16 (3): 203–232.
63.
SnidermanPMHagendoornLPriorM (2004) Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities. American Political Science Review98 (1): 35–49.
SoltF (2016) The Standardized World Income Inequality Database. Social Science Quarterly97 (5): 1267–1281.
66.
StephanWGRenfroLC (2002) The Role of Threats in Intergroup Relations. In: MackieDSmithE (eds) From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions. New York: Psychology Press, pp.191–207.
67.
ThalA (2020) The Desire for Social Status and Economic Conservatism among Affluent Americans. American Political Science Review114: 426–442.
68.
ThomsenJPFRafiqiA (2018) When Does Superficial Intergroup Contact Reduce Anti-Foreigner Sentiment? Negative Contact as an Essential Condition. International Journal of Comparative Sociology59 (1): 25–43.
69.
TilleyJNeundorfAHoboltSB (2018) When the Pound in People’s Pocket Matters: How Changes to Personal Financial Circumstances Affect Party Choice. The Journal of Politics80 (2): 555–569.
70.
van LaarCLevinSSinclairS, et al. (2005) The Effect of University Roommate Contact on Ethnic Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology41 (4): 329–345.
71.
van OorschotW (2006) Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy16 (1): 23–42.
72.
Vargas-SalfateSPaezDLiuJH, et al. (2018) A Comparison of Social Dominance Theory and System Justification: The Role of Social Status in 19 Nations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin44 (7): 1060–1076.
73.
VerkuytenM (2016) The Integration Paradox: Empiric Evidence from the Netherlands. American Behavioral Scientist60 (5–6): 583–596.
74.
WilkinsCLKaiserCR (2014) Racial Progress as Threat to the Status Hierarchy Implications for Perceptions of Anti-White Bias. Psychological Science25 (2): 439–446.
75.
ZillerC (2015) Ethnic Diversity, Economic and Cultural Contexts, and Social Trust: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from European Regions, 2002–2010. Social Forces93 (3): 1211–1240.
76.
ZillerCHeizmannB (2020) Economic Conditions and Native-Immigrant Asymmetries in Generalized Social Trust. Social Science Research87: 102399.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
