When political scandals erupt in the press, we usually blame misconduct by public officials, but these episodes are political events whose occurrence and severity also depend in part on the political and media context. Using data on U.S. governors, I show that several key factors affect the likelihood and intensity that alleged misconduct will be politicized by the opposition and publicized by the press. First, lower approval ratings, which decrease the cost of politicizing and publicizing an allegation, are generally associated with more frequent and intense media scandals. By contrast, competing news events can crowd potential scandals off the news agenda. However, no evidence is found that opposition control of state political institutions leads to more media scandal. These results suggest that the occurrence of media scandal depends more on circumstance than we typically assume.
AdutAri. 2005. “A Theory of Scandal: Victorians, Homosexuality, and the Fall of Oscar Wilde.”American Journal of Sociology111 (July): 213–48.
2.
AngristJoshua D.PischkeJörn-Steffen2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3.
AnsolabehereStephenSnowbergErik C.SnyderJames M.2006. “Television and the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections.”Legislative Studies Quarterly31 (4): 469–90.
4.
Associated Press. 2014. The Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law 2014. New York: Basic Books.
5.
BasingerScott J.2013. “Scandals and Congressional Elections in the Post-Watergate Era.”Political Research Quarterly66 (2): 385–98.
6.
BasingerScott JRottinghausBrandon. 2012a. “Skeletons in the White House Closets: An Empirical Investigation into Modern Presidential Scandals.”Political Science Quarterly127 (2): 213–39.
7.
BasingerScott JRottinghausBrandon. 2012b. “Stonewalling and Suspicion during Presidential Scandals.”Political Research Quarterly65 (2): 290–302.
8.
BenderBryan. 2006. “Bucking White House, NBC Says Iraq in ‘Civil War.’”Boston Globe, November28, A1.
9.
BennettW. Lance. 1990. “Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States.”Journal of Communication40 (2): 103–27.
10.
BennettW. Lance. 2004. “Gatekeeping and Press-Government Relations: A Multigated Model of News Construction.” In Handbook of Political Communication Research, edited by KaidLynda Lee283–314. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Butler, Daniel M., and Ana L. De La O.2010. “The Causal Effect of Media-Driven Political Interest on Political Attitudes and Behavior.”Quarterly Journal of Political Science5 (4): 321–37.
13.
CameronA. ColinTrivediPravin K.2010. Microeconometrics Using Stata: Revised Edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
14.
CameronCharles M.2002. “Studying the Polarized Presidency.”Presidential Studies Quarterly32 (December): 647–63.
15.
CarterDavid B.SignorinoCurtis S.2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.”Political Analysis18:271–92.
16.
ClaymanSteven E.HeritageJohnElliottMarc N.McDonaldLaurie L.2007. “When Does the Watchdog Bark? Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences.”American Sociological Review72 (1): 23–41.
17.
CookTimothy E.2005. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. 2nd ed.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
18.
DunningThad. 2007. “Improving Causal Inference: Strengths and Limitations of Natural Experiments.”Political Research Quarterly61 (2): 282–93.
19.
EisenseeThomasStrömbergDavid. 2007. “News Droughts, News Floods, and U.S. Disaster Relief.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics122 (2): 693–728.
20.
ElwertFelixWinshipChristopher. 2014. “Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable.”Annual Review of Sociology40:31–53.
21.
EntmanRobert M.2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
EntmanRobert M.2012. Scandal and Silence: Media Responses to Presidential Misconduct. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
23.
FogartyBrian J.2013. “Scandals, News Coverage, and the 2006 Congressional Elections.”Political Communication30 (3): 419–33.
24.
GasperJohn T.ReevesAndrew. 2011. “Make It Rain? Retrospection and the Attentive Electorate in the Context of Natural Disasters.”American Journal of Political Science55 (2): 340–55.
25.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers.”Econometrica78 (1): 35–71.
26.
GordonSanford C.2010. “Assessing Partisan Bias in Federal Public Corruption Prosecutions.”American Political Science Review103 (4): 534–54.
27.
ImbensGuidoKalyanaramanKarthik. 2012. “Optimal Bandwidth Choice for the Regression Discontinuity Estimator.”The Review of Economic Studies79 (3): 933–59.
28.
KousserThadPhillipsJustin H.2012. The Power of American Governors: Winning on Budgets and Losing on Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KrinerDouglas L.SchicklerEric. 2014. “Investigating the President: Committee Probes and Presidential Approval, 1953–2006.”Journal of Politics76 (2): 521–34.
30.
KrinerDouglasSchwartzLiam. 2008. “Divided Government and Congressional Investigations.”Legislative Studies Quarterly33 (2): 295–321.
31.
KurtzHoward. 1991. “Scandal.”The Washington Post Magazine, September22, W10.
32.
MarkovitsAndreiSilversteinMark. 1988. “Power and Process in Liberal Democracies.” In The Politics of Scandal, edited by Andrei MarkovitsSilversteinMark, 1–12. New York: Holmes & Meier.
33.
MayhewDavid R.2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-2002. 2nd ed.New Haven: Yale University Press.
34.
MeinkeScott R.AndersonWilliam D.2001. “Influencing from Impaired Administrations: Presidents, White House Scandals, and Legislative Leadership.”Legislative Studies Quarterly26 (February): 639–59.
35.
NyhanBrendan. 2015. “Scandal Potential: How Political Context and News Congestion Affect the President’s Vulnerability to Media Scandal.”British Journal of Political Science45 (2): 435–66.
36.
ParkerDavid C. W.DullMatthew. 2009. “Divided We Quarrel: The Politics of Congressional Investigations, 1947–2004.”Legislative Studies Quarterly34 (3): 319–45.
37.
PuglisiRiccardoSnyderJames M.2011. “Newspaper Coverage of Political Scandals.”Journal of Politics73 (3): 1–20.
38.
ReevesAndrew. 2011. “Political Disaster: Unilateral Powers, Electoral Incentives, and Presidential Disaster Declarations.”Journal of Politics73 (4): 1142–51.
39.
RottinghausBrandon. 2014a. “Monkey Business: The Effect of Scandals on Presidential Primary Nominations.”PS: Political Science & Politics47 (2): 379–85.
40.
RottinghausBrandon. 2014b. “Surviving Scandal: The Institutional and Political Dynamics of National and State Executive Scandals.”PS: Political Science & Politics47:131–40.
41.
RottinghausBrandon. 2015. The Institutional Effects of Executive Scandals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
ShawDaron R.1999. “A Study of Presidential Campaign Event Effects from 1952 to 1992.”Journal of Politics61 (May): 387–422.
43.
ShorBorisMcCartyNolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.”American Political Science Review105 (3): 530–51.
44.
SparrowBartholomew H.1999. Uncertain Guardians: The News Media as a Political Institution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45.
SparrowBartholomew H.2006. “A Research Agenda for an Institutional Media.”Political Communication23 (2): 145–57.
46.
TuchmanGaye. 1972. “Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen’s Notions of Objectivity.”American Journal of Sociology77 (4): 660–79.
47.
WaisbordSilvio R.2004. “Scandals, Media, and Citizenship in Contemporary Argentina.”American Behavioral Scientist47 (8): 1072–98.
48.
WelchSusanHibbingJohn R.1997. “The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982–1990.”Journal of Politics59 (February): 226–39.
49.
WoodwardBobBernsteinCarl. 1974. All the President’s Men. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
