High school students, particularly those with disabilities, often struggle with academic engagement in general education classes. One empirically supported method for improving academic engagement includes self-regulation interventions. However, individual effects of frequently used self-regulation strategies’ goal setting and self-monitoring remain unknown. To address this issue, we implemented a multiple-probe single-case design with embedded alternating treatments to evaluate the differential impact of behavioral goal reminders and self-monitoring. The sample consisted of three high school students with emotional or behavioral disorders (EBD) in general education classes who also received special education services. Innovative approaches to intervention design included student-determined behavioral goals and self-monitoring procedures informed by triangulated behavioral assessment data. Although visual analysis indicated only moderate improvements in academic engagement, and no functional relationships were determined for either the multiple-probe or alternating treatments designs, the intervention was rated with high social validity from teachers and students, and the study represents an exemplar of high-quality special education single-case research. Practical implications, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.
BarbrackC. R.MaherC. A. (1984). Effects of involving conduct problem adolescents in the setting of counseling goals. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 6(2), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J019v06n02_03
2.
BruhnA. L.GilmourA.RilaA.HancockE.Van CampA.ShaefferA.FernandoJ.WehbyJ. (2020). Treatment components and participant characteristics associated with outcomes in self-monitoring interventions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300720946651
3.
BruhnA. L.McDanielS. C.FernandoJ.TroughtonL. (2016). Goal-setting interventions for students with behavior problems: A systematic review. Behavioral Disorders, 42(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-41.2.107
4.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.CrnoboriM.BruhnA. L.OakesW. P. (2011). Self-Determination interventions for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders: Mapping the knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 36(2), 100–116.
5.
ClemonsL. L.MasonB. A.Garrison-KaneL.WillsH. P. (2016). Self-monitoring for high school students with disabilities: A cross-categorical investigation of I-Connect. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715596134
6.
CovingtonM. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.17
7.
EstrapalaS. (2020) Behavioral self-regulation: A comparison of goal reminders and self-monitoring (Publication No. 27961255) [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Iowa]. The University of Iowa, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database.
8.
GardnerT. W.DishionT. J.ConnellA. M. (2008). Adolescent self-regulation as resilience: Resistance to antisocial behavior within the deviant peer context. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9176-6
9.
GreshamF.ElliottS. N. (2008). SSIS: Social skills improvement system-ratings scale manual (1st ed.). M.N. Pearson.
HaglerM.BanyardV.GrychJ.HambyS. (2016). The ups and downs of self-regulation: Tracing the patterns of regulatory abilities from adolescence to middle adulthood in a rural sample. Journal of Rural Mental Health, 40, 164–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000053
12.
HolcombeA.WoleryM.GastD. L. (1994). Comparative single subject research: Description of designs and discussion of problems. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 168–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112149401400111
13.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McgeeG.OdomS. L.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
14.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.AndersonC. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(8), 1–14.
15.
KellyJ. R.ShogrenK. A. (2014). The impact of teaching self-determination skills on the on-task and off-task behaviors of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426612470515
16.
KernL.ClemensN. H. (2007). Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20206
17.
KlingbeilD. A.Van NormanE. R.McLendonK. E.RossS. G.BegenyJ. C. (2019). Evaluating Tau-U with oral reading fluency data and the impact of measurement error. Behavior Modification, 43, 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445518760174
18.
KoehlerM. J.LevinJ. R. (1998). Regulated randomization: A potentially sharper analytical tool for the multiple-baseline design. Psychological Methods, 3, 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.206
KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (2010). Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychological Methods, 15, 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017736
21.
LanovazM. J.CaradinalP.FrancisM. (2019). Using a visual structured criterion for the analysis of alternating-treatment designs. Behavior Modification, 43, 115–131. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1177/014544551773927
22.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.). (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge.
23.
LevinJ. R.KratochwillT. R.FerronJ. M. (2019). Randomization procedures in single-case intervention research contexts: (Some of) “the rest of the story.”Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 112, 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.558
24.
LloydB. P.BruhnA. L.SutherlandK. S.BradshawC. P. (2019). Progress and priorities in research to improve outcomes for students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 44, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918808485
25.
MagerU.NowakP. (2011). Effects of student participation in decision making at school: A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Educaitonal Research Review, 7, 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.001
26.
ManolovR.OnghenaP. (2018). Analyzing data from single-case alternating treatments designs. Psychological Methods, 23, 480–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000133
27.
MartensB. K.WittJ. C.ElliottS. N.DarveauxD. X. (1985). Teacher judgements concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.16.2.191
28.
ParkerR. I.VannestK.DavisJ.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
29.
ShadishW. R.ZelinskyN. A.VeveaJ. L.KratochwillT. R. (2016). A survey of publication practices of single-case design researchers when treatments have small or large effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 656–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.308
30.
ShogrenK. A.VillarrealM. G.LangK.SeoH. (2017). Mediating role of self-determination constructs in explaining the relationship between school factors and postschool outcomes. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916660089
31.
TrentacostaC. J.ShawD. S. (2009). Emotional self-regulation, peer rejection, and antisocial behavior: Developmental associations from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.016
32.
TurcoT. L.ElliottS. N. (1986). Students’ acceptability ratings of interventions for classroom misbehaviors: A study of well-behaving and misbehaving youth. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428298600400404
33.
Van CampA.WehbyJ. H.CopelandB. A.BruhnA. L. (2020). Building from the bottom up: The importance of Tier 1 supports in the context of Tier 2 interventions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 23, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300720916716
34.
VannestK.NinciJ. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038
35.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0). Texas A&M University. singlecaseresearch.org
36.
WehmeyerM. L.BakerD. J.BlumbergR.HarrisonR. (2004). Self-determination and student involvement in functional assessment: Innovative practices. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007040060010501
37.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 439–453.
38.
WillsH. P.MasonB. A. (2014). Implementation of a self-monitoring application to improve on-task behavior: A high-school pilot study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9204-x
39.
Yucesoy-OzkanS.RakapS.GulboyE. (2019). Evaluation of treatment effect estimates in single-case experimental research: Comparison of twelve overlap methods and visual analysis. British Journal of Special Education, 47, 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12294
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
