Intervention studies focused on improving reading outcomes are scarce for postsecondary students with disabilities. Historically, comprehensive transition and postsecondary education programs (CTPs) for students with disabilities focused on employment, living, personal, and social skills over academic instruction. Recently, there is an emphasis to teach selfdetermination skills in postsecondary settings. For students in K–12, self-determination interventions positively impact academic outcomes. The present study tested the effects of a self-determination learning program—Data Mountain—on the oral reading fluency (ORF) of students with disabilities enrolled in a CTP in the U.S. state of Iowa. Using a feasibility study, the researchers assigned 40 postsecondary students with disabilities to receive Data Mountain or progress monitoring activities only (comparison condition). Preliminary evidence from hierarchical linear modeling indicated Data Mountain students read an average of 20 more words per minute with a growth rate twice that of comparison students (p < .01). Findings provide evidence that postsecondary students with disabilities exhibit continued improvement on ORF progress monitoring.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 219–277. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002219
BerkeleyS.MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (2011). Reading comprehension strategy instruction and attribution retraining for secondary students with learning and other mild disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.177/002219410371677
4.
BerkmanN. D.SheridanS. L.DonahueK. E.HalpernD. J.CrottyK. (2011). Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005
5.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS. Y.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzinexyaB. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200401
6.
BrunoL. P.LewisA. M.KaldenbergE. R.BahrP. A.ImmerfallJ. (2020). Direct instruction of text-to-speech software for students with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(4), 424–437. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27077934
7.
BrysbaertM. (2019). How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate. Journal of Memory and Language, 109(1), 104047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104047
8.
ButlerD. L. (1995). Promoting strategic learning by postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(3), 170–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949502800306
9.
ChristT. J.ArañasY. A.KemberJ. M.KissA. J.McCarthy-TrentmanA.MonaghenB. D.WhiteM. J. (2014). Formative assessment system for teachers technical manual: CBMReading. Formative Assessment System for Teachers.
10.
ColeS.CawthonS. W. (2015). Self-disclosure decisions of university students with learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 163–179.
11.
CollinsG.WolterJ. A. (2018). Facilitating postsecondary transition and promoting academic success through language/literacy-based self-determination strategies. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017
12.
CookA. L.WilczenskiF. L.VanderbergL. (2017). Inclusive concurrent enrollment: A promising postsecondary transition practice for building self-determination among students with intellectual disability. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 1(1), 25–44.
13.
CopelandS. R.ZagonaA. L. (2022). Literacy learning among students with complex support needs in postsecondary education programs: A scoping literature review. Inclusion, 10(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/0.1352/2326-6988-10.2.118
14.
CoyneM. D.OldhamA.DoughertyS. M.LeonardK.KoriakinT.GageN. A.BurnsD.GillisM. (2018). Evaluating the effects of supplemental reading intervention within an MTSS or RTI reading reform initiative using a regression discontinuity design. Exceptional Children, 84(4), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918772791
15.
DessemontetR. S.de ChambrierA. F.MartinetC.MeuliN.LinderA. L. (2021). Effects of a phonics-based intervention on the reading skills of students with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 111(1), 103883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103883
16.
DidionL.TosteJ. R. (2021). Data mountain: Self-monitoring, goal setting, and motivation training to support the oral reading fluency of struggling readers in the elementary grades. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(5), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022194211043482
17.
DidionL.TosteJ. R.BenzS. A. (2020). Self-determination to increase oral reading fluency for third grade students with and at risk for reading disabilities: Pilot and replication single-case designs. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 35(4), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12234
18.
DidionL.TosteJ. R.BenzS. A.ShogrenK. A. (2021). Components of self-determination integrated within reading interventions for elementary students with learning disabilities: A research synthesis. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 44(4), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948721989328
19.
EcalleJ.DujardinE.GomesC.CrosL.MagnanA. (2021). Decoding, fluency, and reading comprehension: Examining the nature of their relationships in a large-scale study with first graders. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 37(5), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1846007
20.
ElorantaA. K.NärhiV. M.EklundK. M.AhonenT. P.AroT. I. (2019). Resolving reading disability—Childhood predictors and adult-age outcomes. Dyslexia, 25(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1605
21.
FildermanM. J.TosteJ. R.DidionL. A.PengP.ClemensN. H. (2018). Data-based decision making in reading interventions: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the effects for struggling readers. Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918790001
22.
FortsA. M.LuckassonR. (2011). Reading, writing, and friendship: Adult implications of effective literacy instruction for students with intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3–4), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494811800824417
23.
GarciaJ. R.CainK. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 74–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499616
24.
GriffinM. M.McMillanE. D.HodappR. M. (2010). Family perspectives on post-secondary education for students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(3), 339–346. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23880108
25.
GrigalM.HartD.SmithF.PapayC.DominD. (2018). Year three annual report of the TPSID model demonstration projects (2017-2018). Institute for Community Inclusion.
26.
GrigalM.HartD.WeirC. (2012). A survey of postsecondary education programs for students with intellectual disabilities in the United States. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 223–233. https://doi/10.1111/jppi.12012
HillD. R. (2016). Phonics based reading interventions for students with intellectual disability: A systematic literature review. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(5), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i5.1472
29.
HinzmanM. L.HuaY.Woods-GrovesS. (2017). Improving reading comprehension using a paraphrasing strategy for young adults with intellectual disability. Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts Boston.
30.
HospJ. L.FordJ. W.HuddleS. M.HensleyK. K. (2018). The importance of replication in measurement research: Using curriculum-based measures with postsecondary students with developmental disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 43(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508417727489
31.
HospJ. L.SucheyN. (2014). Reading assessment: Reading fluency, reading fluently, and comprehension—Commentary on the special topic. School Psychology Review, 43(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2014.12087454
32.
HuaY.HendricksonJ. M.TherrienW. J.Woods-GrovesS.RiesP. S.ShawJ. J. (2012). Effects of combined reading and question generation on reading fluency and comprehension of three young adults with autism and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835761244842
33.
HuaY.Woods-GrovesS.FordJ. W.NoblesK. A. (2014). Effects of the paraphrasing strategy on expository reading comprehension of young adults with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(3), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835761244842
34.
HuaY.Woods-GrovesS.YuanC. (2019). Literacy interventions for young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the inclusive postsecondary education settings: A review of a program of research. Journal of Inclusive Postsecondary Education, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.13021/jipe.2019.2456
35.
JohnsonE. S.GalowP. A.AllengerR. (2013). Application of algebra curriculum-based measurements for decision making in middle and high school. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508412461435
36.
JungP. G.McMasterK. L.KunkelA. K.ShinJ.SteckerP. M. (2018). Effects of data-based individualization for students with intensive learning needs: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(3), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12172
37.
KonradM.FowlerC. G.WalkerA. R.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2007). Effects of self-determination interventions on the academic skills of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(2), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035545
38.
LemonsC. J.SinclairA. C.GeselS.Gruner GandhiA.DanielsonL. (2017). Supporting implementation of data-based individualization: Lessons learned from NCII’s first five years. National Center on Intensive Intervention.
39.
LewisL.FarrisE. (1999). An institutional perspective on students with disabilities in postsecondary education (NCES 1999–046). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
40.
MellardD.WoodsK.FallE. (2011). Assessment and instruction of oral reading fluency among adults with low literacy. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 5(1), 3–14.
41.
MooreE. J.SchellingA. (2015). Postsecondary inclusion for individuals with an intellectual disability and its effects on employment. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 19(2), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/174462951456444
42.
NewmanL. A.MadausJ. W. (2015). Reported accommodations and supports provided to secondary and postsecondary students with disabilities: National perspective. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413518235
43.
PapayC. K.BambaraL. M. (2011). Postsecondary education for transition-age students with intellectual and other developmental disabilities: A national survey. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(1), 78–93. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23880032
44.
PapayJ. P.Bacher-HicksA.PageL. C.MarinellW. H. (2017). The challenge of teacher retention in urban schools: Evidence of variation from a cross-site analysis. Educational Researcher, 46(8), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17735812
45.
RandallK. N.RyanJ. B.HirschS. E.AllenA. A. (2022). A self-monitoring intervention to improve the self-determination of individuals with intellectual and developmental disability in a postsecondary educational program. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 38(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576221121637
46.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage.
47.
RaudenbushS. W.CongdonR. T. (2021). HLM 8: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Scientific Software International.
48.
ReschlyA. L.BuschT. W.BettsJ.DenoS. L.LongJ. D. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47(6), 427–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.001
49.
RobertsC. A.LekoM. M.WilkersonK. L. (2013). New directions in reading instruction for adolescents with significant cognitive disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34(5), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513485447
50.
RupparA. L. (2015). A preliminary study of the literacy experiences of adolescents with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193251455809
51.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford publications.
52.
SchneiderJ. L.FootR. (2013). Teaching strategies to support vocational education students’ reading literacy. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 86(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2012.731021
53.
SheltonA.WexlerJ.SilvermanR. D.StapletonL. M. (2019). A synthesis of reading comprehension interventions for persons with mild intellectual disability. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 612–651. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543198570
54.
ShogrenK. A.LittleT. D.WehmeyerM. L. (2017). Human agentic theories and the development of self-determination. In WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.LittleT. D.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Development of self-determination through the life-course (pp. 17–26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6
55.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A. (2017). The impact of personal factors on self-determination and early adulthood outcome constructs in youth with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/104420731666773
56.
ShogrenK. A.WardM. J. (2018). Promoting and enhancing self-determination to improve the post-school outcomes of people with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 48(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/ 10.3233/JVR-180935
57.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Forber-PrattA.LittleT. J.LopezS. J. (2015). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), 251–263.
58.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913489733
59.
StataCorp. (2023). Stata statistical software: Release 18.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (2012). TOWRE-2 examiner’s manual. Pro-Ed.
62.
WanzekJ.OtaibaS. A.SchatschneiderC.DoneganR. E.RivasB.JonesF.PetscherY. (2020). Intensive intervention for upper elementary students with severe reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(3), 408–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1710886
63.
WaymanM.WallaceT.WileyH. I.TicháR.EspinC. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 85–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410020401
64.
WehmeyerM. L. (2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(3), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.3.113
65.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK. (1995). The Arc’s Self Determination Scale. The Arc.
66.
WhirleyM. L.GilsonC. B.GushanasC. M. (2020). Postsecondary education programs on college campuses supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the literature: A scoping review. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(4), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/216514342092965
67.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432.
68.
Woods-GrovesS.HughesC. A.TherrienW. J.HuaY.HendricksonJ. M.ShawJ. W. (2012). Effectiveness of an essay writing strategy for post-secondary students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(2), 210–222. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23880101
69.
ZhengC.Gaumer EricksonA.KingstonN. M.NoonanP. M. (2014). The relationship among self-determination, self-concept, and academic achievement for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(5), 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412469688
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
