High school graduation rates for youth in foster care are disproportionally low. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between self-regulation and high school graduation trajectory for foster youth with and without disabilities. Approximately 54% of the 37 youth in this study were on-track for on time high school graduation, although youth with disabilities were significantly less likely to be on track for graduation. Importantly, higher self-regulation skill increased the likelihood that all foster youth (with and without disabilities) were on track for graduation. Implications for school-based youth supports are discussed.
AvantD.Miller-OttA.HoustonD. (2021). “I need to aim higher”: Former foster youths’ pathways to college success. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 30, 1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01892-1
3.
BlakesleeJ. E.PowersL. E.GeenenS.SchmidtJ.NelsonM.FullertonA.GeorgeK.McHughE.BryantM., & Research Consortium to Increase the Success of Youth in Foster Care. (2020). Evaluating the My Life self-determination model for older youth in foster care: Establishing efficacy and exploring moderation of response to intervention. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105419
4.
BrinserH.WisselA. (2020). Serving students in foster care: Implications and interventions for school counselors. The Professional Counselor, 10, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.15241/hb.10.2.170
5.
BurkeK. M.RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.HagiwaraM.Mumbardó-AdamC.UyanikH.BehrensS. (2020). A meta-analysis of interventions to promote self-determination for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518802274
CavendishW. (2013). Student perceptions of school efforts to facilitate student involvement, school commitment, self-determination and graduation track. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9212-
8.
CavendishW. (2016). The role of gender, race/ethnicity, and disability on the relationship between school and family support and self-determination. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143416629359
9.
CavendishW.SamsonJ. (Eds.). (2021). Intersectionality in education: Toward more equitable policy, research, and practice. Teachers College Press: Disability, Culture, & Equity Series.
10.
ClemensE.HelmH.MyersK.ThomasC.TisM. (2017). The voices of youth formerly in foster care: Perspectives on educational attainment gaps. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.003
11.
CollinsP. (2019). Intersectionality as critical social theory. Duke University Press.
12.
CoxT. (2012). Improving educational outcomes for children and youth in foster care. Children & Schools, 35, 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cds040
13.
DeciE.RyanR. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
14.
Del QuestA.FullertonA.GeenenS.PowersL. (2012). Voices of youth in foster care and special education regarding their educational experiences and transition to adulthood. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1604–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.04.018
FordJ.BlausteinM. (2013). Systematic self-regulation: A framework for trauma-informed services in residential juvenile justice programs. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9538-5
17.
GeenenS. J.PowersL. E.HogansenJ.PittmanJ. (2007). Youth with disabilities in foster care: Developing self-determination within the context of struggle and disempowerment. Exceptionality, 15, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1501_3
18.
GeigerJ. M.Diaz-StrongD. X.Cormack OrellanaC. (2023). “I think there’s a lot of intersectionality”: The college experiences of immigrant-origin Latinx young adults with a foster care background. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 17, 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000460
HartmanJ.WilkinsC.GregoryL.GouldL. F.D’SouzaS. (2011). Applying an on-track indicator for high school graduation: Adapting the Consortium on Chicago School Research indicator for five Texas districts (REL 2011- No. 100). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=264
22.
LeeJ.PowersL.GeenenJ.SchmidtJ.BlakesleeJ.HwangI. (2018). Mental health outcomes among youth in foster care with disabilities. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.09.025
23.
McCashenW. (2005). The strengths approach. St Luke’s Innovative Resources.
24.
McIntoshM. (2019). Compound fractures: Healing the intersectionality of racism, classism and trauma in schools with a trauma-informed approach as part of a social justice framework. Journal of Education Leadership and Policy Studies, 3, 1–14. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1226938.pdf
25.
McKinley YoderC.CantrellM.HinkleJ. (2022). Disparities in high school graduation by identity and disability using intermediate and long-term educational outcomes. The Journal of School Nursing, 40, 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405221078989
26.
Mumbardo-AdamC.Guardia-OlmosJ.GineC. (2018). Assessing self-determination in youth with and without disabilities: The Spanish version of the AIR Self-Determination Scale. Psicothema, 30, 238–243. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.349
27.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Public high school graduation rates: Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/coi
28.
National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2022). Significant disproportionality in special education: Current trends and actions for impact.
29.
NorburyH.WongM.WanY.ReeseK.DhillonS.R. Dean GerdemanR. D. (2012). Using the freshman on-track indicator to predict graduation in two urban districts in the Midwest Region [Summary: Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 134. ED531422]. U.S. Department of Education: Instiute of Education Sciences.
30.
NowickiS.DukeM. P. (1974). A locus of control scale for non-college as well as college adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 136–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1974.10119950
31.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2022). 2021 Annual report to congress on the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). U.S. Department of Education.
32.
PalmerL.FontS.HerdT.PrindleJ.Putnam-HornsteinE. (2022). Rates of emotional disturbance among children in foster care: Comparing federal child welfare data and Medicaid records in two states. Child Maltreatment, 29, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595221118931
33.
PalmieriL.La SalleT. (2017). Supporting students in foster care. Psychology in the Schools, 54, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21990
PearsK.FisherP.BronzK. (2007). An intervention to promote social emotional school readiness in foster children: Preliminary outcomes from a pilot study. School Psychology Review, 36, 665–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087925
36.
PeduzziP.ConcatoJ.KemperE.HolfordT.FeinsteinA. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3
37.
PowersL.FullertonA.SchmidtJ.GeenenS.KennedyM.DohnJ.NelsonM.IavandittiR.BlakesleeJ., & Research Consortium to Increase the Success of Youth in Foster Care. (2018). Perspectives of youth in foster care on essential ingredients for promoting self-determination and successful transition to adult life: My life model. Children and Youth Services Review, 86, 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.02.007
38.
PowersL.GeenenS.PowersJ.Pommier-SatyaS.TurnerA.DaltonL.DrummondD.SwankP., & Research Consortium to Increase the Success of Youth in Foster Care. (2012). My life: Effects of a longitudinal, randomized study of self-determination enhancement on the transition outcomes of youth in foster care and special education. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2179–2187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.018
39.
PulosJ.MorinK.PeltierC.SinclairT.Williams-DiehmK. (2023). Effects of the SDLMI on academic and non-academic behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 33, 615–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09508-6
40.
RutmanD.HubbersteyC. (2018). Fostering educational success of children and youth in foster care: Perspectives of youth with experience living in care. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.022
41.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. Guilford Press.
42.
SandhS.DonaldsonV.KatzC. (2020). Students connected to foster care: An overview of high school experiences. Children and Youth Services Review, 113, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104905
43.
ShererM.MadduxJ.MercadanteB.Prentice-DunnS.JacobsB.RogersR. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663
44.
ShogrenK. A.RaleyS.BurkeK.WehmeyerM. (2019). The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction teacher’s guide. Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
45.
ShogrenK. A.ScottL.HicksT.RaleyS.HagiwaraM.PaceJ.GerisimovaG.AlsaeedA.KiblenJ. (2021). Exploring self-determination outcomes of racially and ethnically marginalized students with disabilities in inclusive, general education classrooms. Inclusion, 9, 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-9.3.189
46.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL.RaleyS.WehmeyerM. (2018). Exploring the effect of disability, race-ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on scores on the Self-Determination Inventory: Student report. Exceptional Children, 85, 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918782150
47.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913489733
48.
StewartK.CavendishW. (2021). Towards more effective child welfare and education policies. In CavendishW.SamsonJ. (Eds.), Intersectionality in education: Toward more equitable policy, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
VittinghoffE.McCullochC. (2006). Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. American Journal of Epidemiology, 165, 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwk052
51.
WehmeyerM. (1999). A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835769901400107
52.
WehmeyerM. (2006). Self-determination: What is it and why is it important? In WehmeyerM.FieldS. (Eds.), Self-determination: Assessment and instructional strategies (pp. 1–12). Corwin.
53.
WehmeyerM.AberyB.ZhangD.WardK.WillisD.HossainW.. . .WalkerH. M. (2011). Personal self-determination and moderating variables that impact efforts to promote self-determination. Exceptionality, 19, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2011.537225
54.
WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD.StancliffeR. (2003). Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice. Charles C. Thomas.
WhitmanT. L. (1990). Self-regulation and mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 347–362.
57.
WilsonB.CooperK.KastanisA.NezhadS. (2014). Sexual & gender minority youth in Los Angeles foster care. The Williams Institute, University of California, Los Angeles.
58.
ZirkusK.MorganJ. (2020). Enhancing self-determination skills for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55, 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345121985
