Smart Manufacturing Systems need to be agile to adapt to new situations by using detailed, precise, and appropriate data for intelligent decision-making. The intricacy of the relationship of strategic goals with operational performance across the many levels of a manufacturing system inhibits the realization of Smart Manufacturing Systems. This article proposes a method for identifying what aspects of a manufacturing system should be addressed to respond to changing strategic goals. The method uses standard modeling techniques in specifying a manufacturing system and the relationship between strategic goals and operational performance metrics. Two existing reference models related to manufacturing operations are represented formally and harmonized to support the proposed method. The method is illustrated for a single scenario using agility as a strategic goal.
BarkmeyerEChristopherNFengS (1987) SIMA reference architecture part 1: activity models. NIST IR 5939. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
2.
ChenY-JChenY-MWuM-S (2010) Development of an ontology-based expert recommendation system for product empirical knowledge consultation. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications18(3): 233–253.
3.
ChoiSJungKDo NohS (2015) Virtual reality applications in manufacturing industries: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications23(1): 40–63.
4.
ElMaraghyWElMaraghyHTomiyamaT. (2012) Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals: Manufacturing Technology61(2): 793–814.
5.
EynardBLiénardSCharlesS. (2005) Web-based collaborative engineering support system: applications in mechanical design and structural analysis. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications13(2): 145–153.
6.
FernandezGMSeepersadCCRosenDW. (2005) Decision support in concurrent engineering—the utility-based selection decision support problem. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications13(1): 13–27.
7.
GiachettiREArangoJ (2003) A design-centric activity-based cost estimation model for PCB fabrication. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications11(2): 139–149.
8.
GruberTR (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing?International Journal of Human-Computer Studies43(5): 907–928.
9.
HoWXuXDeyPK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research202(1): 16–24.
10.
HonKKB (2005) Performance and evaluation of manufacturing systems. CIRP Annals: Manufacturing Technology54(2): 139–154.
11.
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2013) IEC 62264-1: Enterprise-Control System Integration—Part 1: Models and Terminology. Geneva: IEC.
12.
International Society of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1998) IEEE 1320.1: IEEE Functional Modeling Language—Syntax and Semantics for IDEF0. New York: International Society of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
13.
ISO 10303-1:1994 (1994). Industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation and exchange—part 1.
14.
ISO 10303-238:2007 (2007) Industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation and exchange—part 238: application protocol: application interpreted model for computerized numerical controllers.
15.
JungKMorrisKLyonsK. (2015) Mapping strategic goals and operational performance metrics for smart manufacturing systems. Procedia Computer Science44C: 504–513.
16.
JungKMorrisKLyonsK. (in preparation) Performance challenges identification method for smart manufacturing systems (NIST IR).
17.
KulvatunyouBChoHSonYJ (2005) A semantic web service framework to support intelligent distributed manufacturing. International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems9(2): 107–127.
18.
KumaraguruSKulvatunyouBMorrisK (2014) Integrating real-time analytics and continuous performance management in smart manufacturing systems. In: GrabotBVallespirBSamuelG (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems: Innovative and Knowledge-Based Production Management in a Global-Local World. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 175–182.
19.
LeeJJungKKimBH. (2015) Semantic web-based supplier discovery system for building a long-term supply chain. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing28(2): 155–169.
20.
LubellJFrechetteSPLipmanRR. (2013) Model-Based enterprise summit report. NIST technical note 1820. US Department of Commerce.
21.
MaJHuJZhengK. (2013) Knowledge-based functional conceptual design: model, representation, and implementation. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications21(2): 103–120.
MauchandMSiadatABernardA. (2008) Proposal for tool-based method of product cost estimation during conceptual design. Journal of Engineering Design19(2): 159–172.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (n.d.) Smart manufacturing systems design and analysis program. Available at: http://www.nist.gov/el/msid/syseng/smsda.cfm
26.
SandbergMBoartPLarssonT (2005) Functional product life-cycle simulation model for cost estimation in conceptual design of jet engine components. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications13(4): 331–342.
Supply Chain Council (SCC) (2008) Supply Chain Operations Reference Model.
29.
TangDZhengLChinKS. (2002) E-DREAM: a web-based platform for virtual agile manufacturing. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications10(2): 165–183.
30.
TorresVHRíosJVizánA. (2013) Approach to integrate product conceptual design information into a computer-aided design system. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. Epub ahead of print 24 January. DOI: 10.1177/1063293X12475233.
31.
VujasinovicMIvezicNBarkmeyerE. (2010) Semantic B2B-integration using an ontological message metamodel. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications18(3): 219–232.
32.
WatsonPCurranRMurphyA. (2006) Cost estimation of machined parts within an aerospace supply chain. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications14(1): 17–26.
ZaleteljVSlugaAButalaP (2008) A conceptual framework for the collaborative modeling of networked manufacturing systems. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications16(1): 103–114.
