Growing efforts in the United Kingdom to establish “triage” programs at the police gateway to the criminal justice system have met mixed success. This article reviews the evaluations of these programs, most of which use clinical rather than actuarial models of forecasting risk. Drawing on a recent experiment in diverting low-risk defendants from prosecution in Birmingham, this article suggests the design and implementation of an actuarial approach to risk assessment that would provide an evidence-based triage tool for processing arrestees in police stations.
ArielB.FarringtonD. P. (2010). Randomised block designs. In PiqueroA. R.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 437–455). New York, NY: Springer.
2.
ArielB.VilaJ.ShermanL. W. (2012). Random assignment without tears: How to stop worrying and love the Cambridge randomiser. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 193–208.
BarnesG. C.AhlmanL.GillC.ShermanL. W.KurtzE.MalvestutoR. (2010). Low-intensity community supervision for low-risk defendants: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology6:159–189.
5.
BerkR.ShermanL. W.BarnesG.AhlmanL.KurtzE.MalvestutoR. (2009). Forecasting murder within a population of probationers and parolees: A high stakes application of statistical learning. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 172, 191–211.
6.
BlakeboroughL.PierpontH. (2007). Conditional cautions: An examination of the early implementation of the program. London, England: Ministry of Justice.
7.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2007). The risk-needs-responsivity model for defendant assessment and rehabilitation. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada.
8.
BrittC.WeisburdD. W. (2010). Statistical power. In PiqueroA. R.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 313–332). New York, NY: Springer.
9.
CosmaI.ShermanL. W.NeyroudP. W. (2013). Towards a crime harm index: Analysis of a PNC data set (Unpublished paper). Cambridge, England: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
10.
Criminal Justice Joint Inspectorates. (2011). Exercising discretion: The gateway to justice. London, England: Author.
DunfordF. (1990). Random assignment: Practical considerations from field experiments. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 125–132.
13.
EvansR.WilkinsonC. (1990). Variations in police cautioning policy and practice in England and Wales. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 155–176.
14.
FarringtonD.BennettT. (1981). Police cautioning of Juveniles in London. British Journal of Criminology, 21, 123–135.
15.
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaseK. A.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida.
16.
FoxJ. (2012). An evaluation of the effectiveness, use and future of police professional practice publications (PhD Dissertation). University of Surrey, Surrey, England.
17.
GillerH.TuttN. (1987). Police cautioning of juveniles: The continuing practice of diversity. Criminal Law Review, June, 367–374.
18.
GreeneJ. (2014). New directions in policing: Balancing prediction and meaning in police research. Justice Quarterly, 31, 193–228.
19.
HainesA.GoldsonB.HaycoxA.HoutenR.LaneS.McGuireT.…WhittingtonR. (2012). Evaluation of the Youth Justice Liaison and Diversion (YJLD) pilot program. Liverpool, England: University of Liverpool.
20.
HarcourtB. E. (2007). Against prediction: Profiling, policing and punishing in an actuarial age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
HarveyE.ShakeshaftA.HetheringtonK.SannibaleC.MattickR. P. (2007). The efficacy of diversion and aftercare for adult drug-involved defendants: A summary and methodological review of the outcome literature. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26, 379–387.
22.
Institute for Criminal Policy Research. (2012). Assessing young people in police custody: An examination of the operation of Triage programs (Occasional Paper 106). London, England: Home Office.
23.
IrvingB.DixonB. (2002). ‘Hotspotting’: Turning police theory into practice in Thames valley and Northumbria. London, England: The Police Foundation.
24.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London, England: Allen Lane.
25.
KennedyD. (2014). Working in the field: Police research in theory and in practice. In CockbainE.KnutssonJ. (Eds.), Applied police research: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 9–21). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
26.
LandauS. F.NathanG. (1983). Selecting delinquents for cautioning in the London Metropolitan Area. British Journal of Criminology, 23, 128–149.
27.
LaycockG.TarlingR. (1985). Police force cautioning: Policy and practice. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 81–92.
28.
LipskyM. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
MackieA.CattellJ.ReederN.WebbS. (2014). Youth restorative intervention evaluation final report. Unpublished report by Social Impact Analysis for Surrey County Council and Surrey Police.
MooreS.SellenJ.CromptonK.HallingbergB. (2012). A brief evaluation of Cardiff Triage. Cardiff, England: Cardiff University.
32.
MorenoY.HughesP. (2008). Effective prosecution: Working in partnership with the CPS. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
33.
MottJ. (1983). Police decisions for dealing with juvenile defendants. British Journal of Criminology, 23, 249–270.
34.
NeyroudP. W. (in press). Learning to experiment: The police, science and evidence-based practice. In LieblingA.ShaplandJ.TankebeJ. (Eds.), Crime, justice and social order: Essays in honour of A. E. bottoms. Oxford, England: OUP.
35.
NeyroudP. W. (2015). Rethinking the gateway: Using evidence to reform the criminal justice system for victims and people who offend. London, England: Howard League for Penal Reform, “What if” series.
36.
NeyroudP. W.SlothowerM. P. (2013). Operation turning point: Second interim report (Interim report to West Midlands Police). Cambridge, England: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
37.
PetrosinoA.Turpin-PetrosinoC.GuckenburgS. (2010). Formal system processing of Juveniles: Effects on delinquency. Campbell Crime and Justice Systematic Review. Retrieved November 25, 2014, fromhttp://www.campbellcollaboration.org
38.
ReulandM. (2004). A guide to implementing police-based diversion programs for people with mental illness. Delmar, NY: Technical Assistance and Policy Analysis Center for Jail Diversion.
39.
RoseG.HamiltonR. A. (1970). Effects of a Juvenile Liaison program. British Journal of Criminology, 10, 2–20.
40.
SandarsA. (1988). The limits to diversion from prosecution. British Journal of Criminology, 28, 513–532.
41.
SchwalbeC. S.GearingR. E.MacKenzieM. J.BrewerK. B.IbrahimR. (2012). A meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programmes for Juvenile defendants. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 26–33.
42.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
43.
ShermanL. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence. New York, NY: Free Press.
44.
ShermanL. W. (1998). Evidence-based policing. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
45.
ShermanL. W. (2010). An introduction to experimental criminology. In PiqueroA. R.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 399–436). New York, NY: Springer.
46.
ShermanL. W. (2011). Al Capone, the Sword of Damocles, and the police–corrections budget ratio. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 195–206.
47.
ShermanL. W. (2013). The rise of evidence-based policing: Targeting, testing and tracking. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice in America: 1975–2025 (pp. 377–451). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
ShermanL. W.MiltonC. H.KellyT. V. (1973). Team policing: Seven case studies. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
49.
ShermanL. W.NeyroudP. W. (2012). Defendant desistance policing and the Sword of Damocles. London, England: Civitas.
50.
ShermanL. W.WilliamsS.ArielB.StrangL. R.WainN.SlothowerM. P.NortonA. (2014). An integrated theory of hot spots patrol strategy: Implementing prevention by scaling up and feeding back. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30, 95–122.
51.
SlothowerM. P. (2014a). Strengthening police professionalism with decision support: Bounded discretion in out-of-court disposals. Policing, 8, 353–368.
52.
SlothowerM. P. (2014b). Victim satisfaction and perceptions of police and criminal justice legitimacy: Mediating impacts of perceptions of problem-solving motive achievement and matching (Masters Dissertation). University of Maryland, Baltimore.
53.
SlothowerM. P.ShermanL.W.NeyroudP. W. (2015). Tracking quality of police actions in a victim contact program: A case study of training, tracking and feedback (TTF) in evidence-based policing. International Criminal Justice Review, 25, 98–116.
54.
StrangH. (2012). Coalitions for a common purpose: Managing relationships in experiments. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 211–227.
55.
StrangH.ShermanL. W.Mayo-WilsonE.WoodsD.ArielB. (2013). Restorative justice conferencing: Effects of face-to-face meetings of defendants and victims. Campbell Crime and Justice Systematic Review. Retrieved November 25, 2014, fromhttp://www.campbellcollaboration.org
56.
TaxmanF. S.BelenkoS. (2012). Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment. New York, NY: Springer.
57.
VitoG.WalshW. F.KunselmanJ. (2005). Community policing: The middle manager’s perspective. Police Quarterly, 8, 490–511.
58.
WalkerS. (1993). Does anyone remember team policing? Lessons for the team policing experience for community policing. American Journal of Police, XII, 33–55.
59.
WeisburdD.NeyroudP. W. (2011). Police science: Toward a new paradigm. Cambridge, MA: Harvard, Kennedy School of Government.
60.
WoodS.EckleyL.StuartJ.HughesK.KellyD.HarrisonD.QuiggZ. (2011). Evaluation of the Youth Crime Action Plan (YCAP) in Liverpool. Liverpool, England: Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University.
