Damage behavior of functionally graded kevlar/carbon epoxy nanocomposites reinforced with polyamide 6.6 nanofiber and MWCNTs subjected to low-velocity impact

Abstract

The use of carbon and kevlar fiber-reinforced composite materials continues to grow in high-tech applications such as aerospace engineering. One of the most desired properties in composite structures is a strong interfacial bond between the matrix and the fiber. Nano-material reinforcement is one of the most preferred methods for strengthening the fiber-matrix interfacial bond. In the present research, polyamide 6.6 (PA 6.6) nanofiber and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) reinforced kevlar fabric (KF), carbon fabric (CF) and epoxy matrix nanocomposite plates were produced by functional grading of these two fabrics. PA 6.6 nanofibers, obtained by electrospinning, were placed between the layers, and 12-layer nanocomposite plates were fabricated using a vacuum-assisted hand lay-up method. In producing MWCNTs reinforced nanocomposite plates, 0.3 wt.% of MWCNTs were added into the epoxy matrix. A comprehensive set of 16 distinct composite plates was manufactured, encompassing unreinforced plates, plates reinforced with MWCNTs, plates reinforced with PA 6.6, and plates reinforced with a combination of PA 6.6 and MWCNTs (PA 6.6-MWCNTs). The impact strengths of the produced composite plates were investigated at energy levels of 20, 40 and 60 J. The effects of reinforcing the composite structure with MWCNTs, PA 6.6, and PA 6.6-MWCNTs, as well as functionally grading KF/CF on impact strength, were investigated in detail. The damages that occurred in the material as a result of the low-velocity impact tests were interpreted by examining the high-resolution camera and optical microscope images. Thus, the nanofiber and nanoparticle reinforcement to composite structure and hybridization effect were evaluated together. With the reinforcement of PA 6.6, MWCNTs and PA 6.6-MWCNTs, the impact strength of the nanocomposite samples increased significantly compared to the unreinforced samples. Moreover, the amount of damage caused by the low-velocity impact test in reinforced samples was significantly reduced.

Keywords

Low-velocity impact damage analysis electrospinning method polyamide 6.6 nanofiber nanocomposite

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ASTM D7136 (2015): Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber-reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop-weight Impact Event: D7136/D7136M-15.

Azimpour-Shishevan

Mohtadi-Bonab

(2023) An experimental study on the effects of introducing carbon nanotube on low velocity impact behavior of carbon/aramid fiber reinforced intra-ply hybrid composites. The Journal of the Textile Institute 114(8): 1167–1176.

Beylergil

Tanoğlu

Aktaş

(2017) Enhancement of interlaminar fracture toughness of carbon fiber–epoxy composites using polyamide‐6, 6 electrospun nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci 34(35): 45244.

Demir

Tatar

Eskizeybek

, et al. (2022) Selectively reinforced functionally graded composite-like glass/carbon polymer nanocomposites: Designed for efficient bending and impact performance. Fibers and Polymers 23(1): 196–211.

Demir

Yar

Eskizeybek

, et al. (2023) Combined effect of fiber hybridization and matrix modification on mechanical properties of polymer composites. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications 237(9): 1935–1951.

Dorigato

Morandi

Pegoretti

(2012) Effect of nanoclay addition on the fiber/matrix adhesion in epoxy/glass composites. Journal of Composite Materials 46(12): 1439–1451.

Eskizeybek

Yar

Avcı

(2018) CNT-PAN hybrid nanofibrous mat interleaved carbon/epoxy laminates with improved mode I interlaminar fracture toughness. Composites Science and Technology 157: 30–39.

Fotouhi

Jalalvand

Wisnom

, et al. (2023) Smart hybrid composite sensor technology to enhance the detection of low energy impact damage in composite structures. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 172: 107595.

Francesconi

Aymerich

(2018) Effect of Z-pinning on the impact resistance of composite laminates with different layups. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 114: 136–148.

10.

Ghatage

Kar

Sudhagar

(2020) On the numerical modelling and analysis of multi-directional functionally graded composite structures: a review. Composite Structures 236: 111837.

11.

Gordon

Wisnom

, et al. (2023) Improved impact damage resistance of tapered composite laminates using a ply scarfing technique. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 166: 107391.

12.

Gunoz

Kur

Kara

(2024) Impact response of hybrid composites under varying environmental conditions: a comparative study. Polymer Composites 45(13): 12481–12494.

13.

Kara

(2012) Failure behavior of filament wound GRP pipes under internal pressure repaired with patch after low velocity impact. PhD Dissertation, Selçuk University, Insititute of Science, Konya.

14.

Kara

Uyaner

, et al. (2021) The effect of hydrothermal aging on the low-velocity impact behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotubes reinforced carbon fiber/epoxy composite pipes. Applied Composite Materials 28(5): 1567–1587.

15.

Kara

Nomer

Kepir

, et al. (2022) Low-energy repeated impact response of nanoparticle reinforced carbon fiber epoxy composite pipes. Composite Structures 299: 116100.

16.

Khoramishad

Ashofteh

(2019) Influence of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on creep behavior of adhesively bonded joints subjected to elevated temperatures. The Journal of Adhesion 95(11): 979–994.

17.

Khoramishad

Khakzad

(2018) Toughening epoxy adhesives with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. The Journal of Adhesion 94(1): 15–29.

18.

Khoramishad

Zarifpour

(2018) Fracture response of adhesive joints reinforced with aligned multi-walled carbon nanotubes using an external electric field. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 98: 220–229.

19.

Khoramishad

Alikhani

Dariushi

(2018) An experimental study on the effect of adding multi-walled carbon nanotubes on high-velocity impact behavior of fiber metal laminates. Composite Structures 201: 561–569.

20.

Kim

Mai

(1998) Engineered İnterfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

21.

Koizumi

(1997) FGM activities in Japan. Composites Part B: Engineering 28(1–2): 1–4.

22.

Laux

Gan

Dulieu-Barton

, et al. (2020) Ply thickness and fibre orientation effects in multidirectional composite laminates subjected to combined tension/compression and shear. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 133: 105864.

23.

Metin

Avcı

(2021) In-plane quasi-static and out-of-plane dynamic behavior of nanofiber interleaved glass/epoxy composites and finite element simulation. Composite Structures 270: 114085.

24.

Mousavi

Khoramishad

(2019) The effect of hybridization on high-velocity impact response of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites using finite element modeling, taguchi method and artificial neural network. Aerospace Science and Technology 94: 105393.

25.

Özer

Kaybal

(2022) Low‐velocity impact response of halloysite nanotube reinforced glass/epoxy multi‐scale composite. Part 1: Dynamic loading performance. Polymer Composites 43(11): 8377–8387.

26.

Palazzetti

Zucchelli

Trendafilova

(2013) The self-reinforcing effect of nylon 6, 6 nano-fibres on CFRP laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Composite Structures 106: 661–671.

27.

Pan

Wang

Ying

, et al. (2022) Failure mechanism of Ω-shape 3D orthogonal woven composite component under transverse low-velocity impact and subsequent axial compression load. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 31(2): 246–274.

28.

Ravandi

Teo

Tran

, et al. (2017) Low velocity impact performance of stitched flax/epoxy composite laminates. Composites Part B: Engineering 117: 89–100.

29.

Sahu

Ponnusami

Weimer

, et al. (2024) Interface engineering of carbon fiber composites using CNT: A review. Polymer Composites 45(1): 9–42.

30.

Sepetcioglu

Gunoz

Kara

(2021) Effect of hydrothermal ageing on the mechanical behaviour of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced basalt fibre epoxy composite pipes. Polymers and Polymer Composites 29(9_suppl): S166–S177.

31.

Seyyednourani

Akgun

Ulus

, et al. (2023) Experimental ınvestigation on compression-after-ımpact (CAI) response of aerospace grade thermoset composites under low-temperature conditions assisted with acoustic emission monitoring. Composite Structures 321: 117260.

32.

Singh

and Mahesh (2022) Effect of ply position switching in quasi-isotropic glass fibre reinforced polymer composite subjected to low velocity impact. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 31(5): 665–693.

33.

Swikker

KRJ

Kanagasabapathy

Neethi Manickam

(2022) Effect of MWCNT on mechanical characterization of glass/carbon hybrid composites. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 236(5): 2155–2163.

34.

Uyaner

Kara

(2007) Dynamic response of laminated composites subjected to low-velocity impact. Journal of Composite Materials 41(24): 2877–2896.

35.

Uyaner

Test to Graph. Mendeley Data V2 (2020).

36.

Wei

Yang

Pan

(2023) Numerical study on the effects of oblique impact on the ballistic behavior of 3D angle interlock woven fabric. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 32(9): 1099–1121.

37.

Yadav

Zabihi

Fakhrhoseini

, et al. (2023) Lignin derived carbon fiber and nanofiber: Manufacturing and applications. Composites Part B: Engineering 255: 110613.