Multi-functional hybrid sandwich composite structures: Evaluating damage mechanics and tolerance using compression after impacts

Abstract

Building upon previous researches that introduced an innovative foam core hybrid-sandwich composite structure for radome applications, showcasing promising performance under low-velocity impacts (LVIs), this paper delves into the assessment of damage tolerance and mechanics through Compression After Impact (CAI) testing. The primary objective is to analyze disparities in damage tolerance, damage mechanisms, displacements, deformations, energy absorption, and residual strengths resulting from LVIs followed by CAIs on dissimilar materials on opposite faces of the hybrid structure. The extent of damage is evaluated through Computed Tomography (CT) scans. During LVIs, impacts on the S glass face sheets side demonstrated different energy dispersion and absorption mechanisms, leading to variations in indent damage depths and widths across all impact energy levels, unlike the impact damages observed from the Kevlar side. During CAI testing, this difference becomes more evident, with Kevlar specimens (KS3 & KS5) showing greater indentation depths and narrower widths, and S glass specimens (SK3 & SK5) experiencing buckling. These effects are due to the unique damage absorption and dispersion properties of Kevlar and S glass. These variations prompted an in-depth investigation of the structure using CAI to comprehend damage tolerance and mechanisms under compressive loads. This study, unparalleled in existing literature, proposes hybrid sandwich structures with superior specific impact and residual strength compared to various composite sandwich structures documented in published literature, expanding their utility beyond radomes.

Keywords

Compression after impacts damage tolerance analysis damage mechanics hybrid sandwich composites low velocity impacts nose radomes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Randjbaran

Zahari

Abdul Jalil

, et al. Hybrid composite laminates reinforced with Kevlar/carbon/glass woven fabrics for ballistic impact testing. Sci World J 2014; 2014: 2–5.

Qiao

. Refined analysis of torsion and in- plane shear of honeycomb sandwich structures. J Sandw Struct Mater 2005; 7: 289–305.

Compston

Styles

Kalyanasundaram

. Low energy impact damage modes in aluminum foam and polymer foam sandwich structures. J Sandw Struct Mater 2006; 8: 365–379.

Akil Hazizan

Cantwell

. The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures. Compos B Eng 2002; 33(3): 193–204.

Tomblin

Raju

Liew

, et al. Impact damage characterization and damage tolerance of composite sandwich airframe structures. Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-00/44. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2001, pp. 20–50.

Tomblin

Raju

Acosta

, et al. Impact Damage Characterization and Damage Tolerance of Composite Sandwich Airframe Structures – Phase II. Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-02/80. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2001, pp. 25–50.

Tomblin

Raju

Arosteguy

. Damage resistance and Tolerance of Composite Sandwich Panels-Scaling Effects. Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-03/75. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2004, pp. 1–8.

Moody

Harris

Vizzini

. Scaling and curvature effects on the damage tolerance of impacted composite sandwich panels. J Sandw Struct Mater 2002; 4: 71–82.

Wang

Waas

Wang

. Experimental and numerical study on the low-velocity impact behavior of foam-core sandwich panels. Compos Struct 2013; 96: 298–311.

10.

Herup

Palazotto

. Low-speed impact damage initiation in graphite/epoxy/Nomex honeycomb-sandwich plates. Compos Sci Technol 2013; 3(12): 1581–1598.

11.

Zhou

Guan

Cantwell

. The impact response of graded foam sandwich structures. Compos Struct 2013; 97: 370–377.

12.

Zhou

Hassan

Guan

, et al. The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich panels. Compos Sci Technol 2012; 72: 1781–1790.

13.

Gning

Tarfaoui

Collombet

, et al. Damage development in thick composite tubes under impact loading and influence on implosion pressure: experimental observations. Compos B Eng 2005; 36(4): 306–318.

14.

Baia

Guo

. Compression after impact behavior of composite foam-core sandwich panels. Compos Struct 2019; 225: 111181.

15.

Elamin

. Compression after impact performance of carbon-fiber foam-core sandwich composites in low temperature conditions. Compos Struct 2021; 261: 113568.

16.

Giannopoulos

Theotokoglou

Zhang

. Impact damage and CAI strength of a woven CFRP material with fire retardant properties. Compos B Eng 2016; 91: 8–17.

17.

Zhou

. The use of experimentally-determined impact force as a damage measure in impact damage resistance and tolerance of composite structures. Compos Struct 1998; 42(4): 375–382.

18.

Talha

Iqbal

. Multi-disciplinary optimization of hybrid composite radomes for enhanced performance. Results in Engineering 2023; 20: 101547.

19.

Muneer

Iqbal

. Experimental investigation and simulation of electro-mechanical behavior of hybrid sandwich composite radomes for aerospace applications. Mechanics of Advanced Composite Structures 2024; 11: 401–412.

20.

Iqbal

Umer

Asim

, et al. Investigating damage resistance in aerospace radome applications: experimental analysis of hybrid sandwich composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos. 2024; 1–16.

21.

Babu

Shivanand

. Compression after impact on GFRP CFRP sandwich composites. Int J Eng Res Technol 2015; V4(7). DOI: 10.17577/ijertv4is070232.

22.

Wan

. The low-velocity impact and compression after impact (CAI) behavior of foam core sandwich panels with shape memory alloy hybrid face-sheets. Sci Eng Compos Mater 2019; 26(1): 517–530. DOI: 10.1515/secm-2019-0034.