This study aimed to explore gender equality in language textbooks in Georgian schools. The content analysis method was used to answer the research questions, and a theoretical framework was developed based on Porreca's Analytical Framework (1984). The research revealed that men remain more visible in textbooks. Social roles, activities, and professions are gender-biased, and the books contribute to the development of gender stereotypes. The study identified five different approaches that school textbook authors adopt toward gender equality: (1) superficial, (2) artificial, (3) additive, (4) deliberate ignorance, and (5) attitudinal nondeliberate gender mainstreaming approach.
AhmadM.ShahS. K. (2019). A critical discourse analysis of gender representations in the content of 5th grade English language textbook. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2019.3989
2.
AlbanaH. H. (2017). Gender Representation In Efl Textbooks In Indonesia (A comparative content analysis between the book of “When English Rings a Bell” and “Pioneer”) [Master's thesis]. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
3.
AminiM.BirjandiP. (2012). Gender bias in the Iranian high school EFL textbooks. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n2p134
4.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs.
5.
BanduraA. (2001). Theoretical integration and research synthesis essay. Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0303_03
6.
BlumbergR. L. (2007). Gender bias in textbooks: A hidden obstacle on the road to gender equality in education. Unesco.
7.
BourdieuP. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
8.
CanaleG. (2021). The language textbook: Representation, interaction & learning: Conclusions. Language. Culture and Curriculum, 34(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1797081
9.
ChanturiaG.KadagidzeM. (2020). Equality policy in general education system. The Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association /Foundation for the Support of Legal Education.
10.
CuramingE. M.CuramingR. A. (2020). Gender (in) equality in English textbooks in the Philippines: A critical discourse analysis. Sexuality & Culture, 24, 1167–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09750-4
11.
DaviesB. (1995). Gender bias in school text books. Commonwealth Secretariat.
12.
DeYoungA. J.ConstantineE. A. (2009). Re-gendered education and society in the newly independent states (NIS) of Central Asia. In BakerD. P.WisemanA. W. (Eds.), Gender, equality and education from international and comparative perspectives (international perspectives on education and society, 10 (pp. 255–299). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3679(2009)0000010011
13.
DurraniN.CohenMillerA.KataevaZ.BekzhanovaZ.SeitkhadyrovaA.BadanovaA. (2022). The fearful khan and the delightful 'beauties’: The construction of gender in secondary school textbooks in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Educational Development, 88, 102508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102508
14.
FaircloughN. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
15.
FalahJ. F.SaedR. (2017). Women and girls in hebrew high school textbooks. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(6), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.56022
16.
GorgadzeN. (2015). Gender aspects in primary education of Georgia. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(11), 110–123.
17.
GorgadzeN. (2016). Textbook analysis of the primary education in Georgia from gender perspective. International Journal of Multilingual Education, 4(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22333/ijme.2016.7001
18.
GouviasD.AlexopoulosC. (2018). Sexist stereotypes in the language textbooks of the Greek primary school: A multidimensional approach. Gender and Education, 30(5), 642–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1237620
19.
HallM. (2014). Gender representation in current EFL textbooks in Iranian secondary schools. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.253-261
HellingerM. (1980). For men must work, and women must weep’: Sexism in English language textbooks used in German schools. Women's Studies International Quarterly, 3(2-3), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(80)92323-4
22.
IslamK. M. M.AsadullahM. N. (2018). Gender stereotypes and education: A comparative content analysis of Malaysian, Indonesian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi school textbooks. PloS one, 13(1), e0190807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190807
23.
JiY.ReissM. J. (2022). Cherish lives? Progress and compromise in sexuality education textbooks produced in contemporary China. Sex Education, 22(4), 496–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2021.1
24.
KarintzaidisN.ChristodoulouA.KyridisA.VamvakidouI. (2016). Gender representations in the illustrations of the 6th grade language textbook used in Greek elementary school. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(6), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.6p.113
25.
KhomerikiI.JavakhishviliM.AbramishviliT. (2012). გენდერული თანასწორობის საკითხი საზოგადოებრივი მეცნიერებების სწავლებისას. სახელმძღვანელოების გენდერული ანალიზი. Gender Equality in Teaching of Social Sciences. Gender Analysis of School Textbooks. Tbilisi. Centre for Civil Integration and Inter-Ethnic Relations.
26.
KobiaJ. M. (2009). Femininity and masculinity in English primary school textbooks in Kenya. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 28(1), 57–71.
27.
KostasM. (2014). Gender discourses and identities in the curriculum and classrooms of Hellenic primary schools [Doctoral dissertation]. Institute of Education, University of London.
28.
KostasM. (2021). Discursive construction of hegemonic masculinity and emphasised femininity in the textbooks of primary education: Children’s discursive agency and polysemy of the narratives. Gender and Education, 33(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1632807
29.
KosterD. (2020). Do representations of gender and profession change over time? Insights from a longitudinal corpus study on Dutch language textbooks (1974–2017). Journal of Gender Studies, 29(8), 883–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1754176
30.
LazarM. (2005). Feminist CDA as political perspective and praxis. In LazarM. M. (Ed.), Feminist critical discourse analysis. Gender, power and ideology in discourse (pp. 1–28). Palgrave Macmillan.
LeeF. K. J.CollinsP. (2008). Gender voices in Hong Kong English textbooks – some past and current practices. Sex Roles, 59(1–2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9414-6
34.
LeeF. K. J.CollinsP. (2010). Construction of gender: A comparison of Australian and Hong Kong English language textbooks. Journal of Gender Studies, 19(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589231003695856
LeeJ. F. (2019). In the pursuit of a gender-equal society: Do Japanese EFL textbooks play a role?Journal of Gender Studies, 28(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2018.1423956
LongweS. H. (1998). Education for women's empowerment or schooling for women's subordination?Gender & Development, 6(2), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/741922726
39.
MacaulayM.BriceC. (1997). Don't touch my projectile: Gender bias and stereotyping in syntactic examples. Language, 798-825.https://doi.org/10.2307/417327
40.
MagnoC.SilovaI. (2007). Teaching in transition: Examining school-based gender inequities in central/Southeastern Europe and the former soviet union. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(6), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2006.08.004
41.
MichelA. (1986). Down with stereotypes!: eliminating sexism from children's literature and school textbooks. Unesco.
42.
MkuchuV. (2004). Gender Roles in Textbooks as a Function of Hidden Curriculum in Tanzanian Primary Schools [Doctor of Education Thesis]. University of South Africa.
43.
Namatende-SakwaL. (2018). The construction of gender in Ugandan English textbooks: A focus on gendered discourses. Pedagogy. Culture & Society, 26(4), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2018.1436583
44.
NduraE. (2004). ESL And cultural bias: An analysis of elementary through high school textbooks in the western United States of America. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 17(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310408666689
45.
OECD (2012). Closing the gender gap, act now. OECD Publishing.
ReissM.JiY. (2022). Cherish lives? Progress and compromise in sexuality education textbooks produced in contemporary China. Sex Education: sexuality, society and learning. (In Press). https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2021.1955670
50.
ShchurkoT. (2018). 'Gender 'education'in the post-Soviet Belarus: Between authoritarian power, neoliberal ideology, and democratic institutions. Policy Futures in Education, 16(4), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317719779
51.
SunderlandJ. (2000). New understandings of gender and language classroom research: Texts, teacher talk and student talk. Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400204
52.
SunderlandJ. (2004). Gendered discourses. New York.
53.
SunderlandJ.CowleyM.RahimF. A.LeontzakouC.ShattuckJ. (2000). From bias “in the text” to “teacher talk around the text”: An exploration of teacher discourse and gendered foreign language textbook texts. Linguistics and Education, 11(3), 251–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00034-6
54.
SunderlandJ.CowleyM.RahimF. A.LeontzakouC.ShattuckJ. (2002). From representation toward discursive practices: Gender in foreign language textbooks revisited. In LitosselitiL.SunderlandJ. (Eds.), Gender identity and discourse analysis (pp. 223–255). John Benjamins.
55.
TabatadzeS. (2021). Reconsidering Monolingual Strategies of Bilingual Education through Translanguaging and Plurilingual Educational Approaches. Are We Moving Back or Forward?”. International Journal for Multilingual Education, 17, ), 47-63.https://doi.org/10.22333/ijme.2021.17003
56.
TabatadzeS.GorgadzeN. (2018). Selective intercultural sensitivity to different sources of cultural identity: Study of intercultural sensitivity of students at teacher education programs of Georgia. Journal for Multicultural Education, 12, ), 1, 35-49.https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-11-2016-0059
57.
TabatadzeS.GorgadzeN. (2022). Development model of gender socialization: school textbooks gender analysis in Georgia. Journal for Multicultural Education, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-05-2022-0065
58.
TabatadzeS.GorgadzeN.GabuniaK.KhomerikiI.TinikashviliD. (2013). Analysis of school textbooks: Intercultural perspective. In TabatadzeS.GorgadzeN. (Eds.), Intercultural education research in primary grades of Georgia (pp. 37–89). Centre for Civil Integration and Inter-Ethnic Relations.
59.
TabatadzeS.GorgadzeN.GabuniaK.TinikashviliD. (2020). Intercultural content and perspectives in school textbooks in Georgia. Intercultural Education, 31(4), 462–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2020.1747290
60.
TabatadzeS. (2015a). Teachers’ approaches to multicultural education in Georgian classrooms. Journal for Multicultural Education, 9(4), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-07-2014-0031
61.
TabatadzeS. (2015b). Textbooks for minority schools of Georgia; problems and challenges. International Journal of Multilingual Education, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22333/ijme.2015.5001
62.
TemkinaA.ZdravomyslovaE. (2003). Gender studies in post-soviet society: Western frames and cultural differences. Studies in East European Thought, 55(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021857831011
ZajdaJ. (2007). The new history school textbooks in the Russian federation: 1992–2004. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920701330164
