Textbooks play a pivotal role in fostering English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ language proficiency. Among the various skills addressed in English language teaching (ELT) materials, reading comprehension is widely regarded as an essential component for improving learners’ linguistic knowledge. Typically, reading passages are followed by a series of activities designed both to assess students’ understanding and to enhance their ability to interpret, analyze, and engage more deeply with the text. Although a substantial body of literature has examined the cognitive demands of EFL instructional content, relatively little attention has been devoted to analyzing second language reading comprehension questions and task types. To fill this lacuna, this study examined the representation of post-reading comprehension questions and tasks using Freeman’s taxonomy across nine Iranian high school English language textbooks from three successive generations in the history of ELT in Iran. The post-reading comprehension questions and tasks in each textbook were analyzed and categorized using a descriptive content analysis approach. The findings indicated that the Content category was the most prevalent across all three generations, followed by the Language and Affect categories. In addition, Generation 2 textbooks contained the highest overall frequency of post-reading comprehension question types, except for the Form question type, which occurred most frequently in Generation 1 textbooks. Across all nine textbooks analyzed, the Explicit question type emerged as the most commonly used, whereas the Evaluation question type was the least represented. The results of the chi-square tests also revealed significant differences among the three generations in terms of the frequency of different question types. The findings have several practical implications for policy makers, material writers, and English teachers.
AdliN.MahmoudiA. (2017). Reading comprehension questions in EFL textbooks and learners’ levels. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(7), 590–595. http://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0707.14
2.
AjidehP.PanahiM. (2016). An analysis of culture-related content in English textbooks for Iranian students entitled ‘Prospect’ and ‘Vision’ series. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(6), 87–93.
3.
AndradeH.L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
4.
AtaiM.R. (2002). ESAP curriculum planning in Iran: An incoherent educational experience. Special Issue of the Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Teacher Training University, 9(3), 17–34.
5.
BaleghizadehS.ZakervafaeiH. (2020). Analyzing post-reading comprehension questions and task types in Four Corners. MEXTESOL, 44(1), 1–11.
6.
BarzanP.SayyadiM. (2023). The evaluation of “vision” English textbooks-a literature review. Research in English Language Education Journal, 2(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.48310/jelt.2023.12619.1027
7.
BatiniF.LuperiniV.CeiE.IzzoD.TotiG. (2021). The association between reading and emotional development: A systematic review. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 9(1), 12–50. http://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v9i1.5053
ClymerT. (1968). What is reading? Some current concepts. In RobinsonH.M. (Ed.), Innovation and change in reading instruction: The sixty-seventh yearbook of the national society for the study of education part II (pp. 7–29). University of Chicago Press.
10.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
11.
CunningsworthA. (1995). Choosing your course book. Cambridge University Press.
12.
Darling-HammondL.HylerM.E.GardnerM. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
13.
DaviesA.WiddowsonH.G. (1974). Reading and writing. In AllenJ.P.B.Pit CorderS. (Eds.), The Edinburgh course in applied linguistics (pp. 155–201). Oxford University Press.
14.
DukeN.K.WardA.E.PearsonP.D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993
15.
ErtugrulogluE.MearnsT.AdmiraalW. (2023). Scaffolding what, why and how? A critical thematic review study of descriptions, goals, and means of language scaffolding in Bilingual education contexts. Educational Research Review, 40, 100550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100550
16.
FreemanD. (2014). Reading comprehension questions: The distribution of different types in global EFL textbooks. In HarwoodN. (Ed.), English language textbooks: Content, consumption, production (pp. 73–110). Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
GanL.LamR. (2025). Language assessment literacy development of a novice university English teacher in the Chinese context. RELC Journal, 56(2), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241231304
18.
GheitasiM.AliakbariM.YousefiN. (2020). Evaluation of cultural representation in Vision English textbook series for Iranian secondary public education. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 12(26), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.22034/elt.2020.11471
19.
GrabeW. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
20.
GuP.Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context and strategies. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1–25.
21.
GuszakF.J. (1967). Teacher questioning and reading. The Reading Teacher, 21(3), 227–234.
22.
HarwoodN. (2021). Coda: An expanding research agenda for the use of instructional materials. The Modern Language Journal, 105(S1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12683
23.
HooverW.A.GoughP.B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
24.
HuangL.ZengJ. (2025). Sustainability of washback effects: A longitudinal study of China’s twice-yearly NMET reform. Language Testing in Asia, 15(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00358-9
25.
JohnsonK.E.GolombekP.R. (2020). Informing and transforming language teacher education pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818777539
26.
KhodabandehF.MombiniR. (2018). Iranian EFL teachers’ and students’ perceptions towards the first grade high school English textbook (Vision 1). The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 11(22), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.30495/jal.2018.541070
27.
Masoumi SoorehE.AhourT. (2020). Internal evaluation of English textbook “Vision 2” from teachers’ perspectives. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 13(27), 237–256. http://doi.org/10.30495/JAL.2020.683594
28.
MasuharaH. (2013). Materials for developing reading skills. In TomlinsonB. (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 365–390). Bloomsbury.
29.
McDonoughJ.ShawC.MasuharaH. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
30.
MckeeS. (2012). Reading comprehension, what we know: A review of research 1995 to 2011. Language Testing in Asia, 2(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-2-1-45
31.
MehriE.AmerianM.AhmadianM.YazdaniH. (2020). A postcolonial perspective towards prefaces of Iranian English language textbooks: The cases of graded, right path to English, and prospect/vision series. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly, 39(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2020.37726.2853
32.
MežekŠ.McGrathL.NegrettiR.BerggrenJ. (2022). Scaffolding L2 academic reading and self-regulation through task and feedback. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3018
33.
MishanF. (2015). Materials development for TESOL. Edinburgh University Press.
34.
MooreN.ColdwellM.PerryE. (2021). Exploring the role of curriculum materials in teacher professional development. In StromK.MillsT.AbramsL. (Eds.). Non-linear perspectives on teacher development (pp. 135–151). Routledge.
35.
NationI.S.P. (1979). The curse of the comprehension question: Some alternatives. Guidelines, 2, 85–103.
36.
NurmatovaS.AltunM. (2023). A comprehensive review of Bloom’s taxonomy integration to enhancing novice EFL educators’ pedagogical impact. Arab World English Journals, 14(3), 380–388. http://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no3.24
37.
NuttallC. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Macmillan Heinemann.
38.
PorterA.C.PolikoffM.S.SmithsonJ. (2009). Is there a de facto national intended curriculum? Evidence from state content standards. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(3), 238–268. http://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709336465
39.
RamdaniJ.M.BakerS.GaoX. (2023). Exploratory practice as a professional development strategy for English-language teachers in Indonesia. RELC Journal, 54(2), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231152944
40.
RathertS.CabaroğluN. (2022). Theorizing textbook adaptation in English language teaching. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1287
41.
RathertS.CabaroğluN. (2024). Teachers as slaves or masters to their coursebooks: An in-depth study on two English language teachers’ coursebook utilization. Language Teaching Research, 28(5), 1816–1841. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211036239
42.
RazmjooS.A.KazempourfardE. (2012). On the representation of Bloom’s revised taxonomy in Interchange course books. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 31(1), 171–204. https://doi.org/10.22099/JTLS.2012.336
RichardsJ.C. (2014). The ELT textbook. In GartonS.GravesK. (Eds.), International perspective on materials in ELT (pp. 19–36). Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
RoohaniA.TaheriF.PoorzanganehM. (2014). Evaluating Four Corners textbooks in terms of cognitive processes using Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 51–67.
46.
ŞahinH.İ. (2022). An evaluation of EFL coursebooks used in state schools in Turkey based on teachers’ opinions. Futuristic Implementations of Research in Education (FIRE), 3(1), 40–56.
47.
SandersN.M. (1966). Classroom questions: What kinds?Harper and Row.
ShepardL.A.PenuelW.R.PellegrinoJ.W. (2018). Classroom assessment principles to support learning and avoid the harms of testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12195
50.
SmithR.J.BarrettT.C. (1974). Teaching reading in the middle grades. Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
51.
SomailiM.H.AlhamamiM. (2023). Perceptions of Saudi EFL teachers on the adequacy of textbooks. Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 7, 277–290. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v7i2.8450
WebbN.L. (2002). Depth-of-knowledge levels for four content areas. Language Arts, 28, 1–9.
55.
WillisJ. (2008). Teaching the brain to read: Strategies to improve fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
