This study explored principle licensure students’ sense of engagement, program effectiveness, and preparedness to lead engagement focused on academic achievement. Data analysis using attributes of effective preparation programs, and positive psychology constructs (e.g., flow) found Goal Achievement, Commitment, and Accomplishment significantly related to flow. Flow was significantly related to Engagement, while Care was significantly related to Commitment and Coping. Perhaps more significantly, the findings yielded seven characteristics of Engaged School Leadership Theory (ESTL) development. Adding to both principal preparation and positive psychology literature, this study offers conceptual understandings toward an emerging theory of Engaged School Leadership.
BeardK. S. (2008). An exploratory study of academic optimism and flow of elementary school teachers (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
2.
BeardK. S. (2015). Theoretically speaking: An interview with Mihaly Csikszent-mihalyi on flow theory development and its usefulness in addressing contemporary challenges in education. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 353–364.
3.
ButlerJ., & KernM. L. (2016). The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(3), 1–48.
4.
CameronK. S., BrightD., & CazaA. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 4, 766–790.
5.
CameronK., MoraC., LeutscherT., & CalarcoM. (2011). Effects of positive practices on organizational effectiveness. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(3), 266–308.
6.
ChiangH., LipscombS., & GillB. (2016). Is school value added indicative of principal quality?Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 283–309.
7.
CliffordM., Behrstock-SherrattE., & FettersJ. (2012). The ripple effect: A synthesis of research on principal influence to inform performance evaluation design. A quality school leadership issue brief. American Institutes for Research.
CreswellJ. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods design. London: Sage.
10.
CreswellJ. W., Plano ClarkV. L., GutmannM. L., & HansonW. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
12.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (2003). Good Business.New York: Viking – Penguin Putnam Inc.
13.
Darling-HammondL., LaPointeM., MeyersonD., & OrrM. (April, 2007) Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Final Report. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
14.
DavisS., Darling-HammondL., LaPointeM., & MeyersonD. (2005). School lead-ership study: Developing successful principals. A review of research commissioned by The Wallace Foundation.Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
15.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. In Writing: A method of inquiry (pp. 923–948). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
DiPaolaM., & HoyW. K. (2014). Improving instruction through supervision, evaluation, and professional development. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
17.
EpsteinJ. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators, and improving schools (2nd ed.). Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
18.
EpsteinJ. L., GalindoC. L., & SheldonS. B. (2011). Levels of leadership: Effects of district and school leaders on the quality of school programs of family and community involvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 462–495.
19.
FlickU. (Ed.). (1998). The psychology of the social. Cambridge University Press.
20.
GardnerH., CsikszentmihalyiM., & DamonW. (2001). Good work when excellence and ethics meet.New York, NY: Basic Books.
21.
GoddardR., GoddardY., KimE. S., & MillerR. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530.
22.
GoldringE., GrissomJ. A., RubinM., NeumerskiC. M., CannataM., DrakeT., & SchuermannP. (2015). Make room value added: Principals’ human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 96–104.
23.
GrissomJ. A., KalogridesD., & LoebS. (2015). Using student test scores to measure principal performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1), 3–28.
HallingerP. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–51.
26.
HallingerP. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239. Analysis of Roles in Support of Student Learning.
27.
HallingerP., BickmanL., & DavisK. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527–549.
28.
HoyW. K. (2003). An analysis of enabling and mindful school structures: Some theoretical, research, and practical consideration. Journal of Educational Administration, 41, 87–108.
29.
HoyW. K., & MiskelC. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
HoyW. K., & SweetlandS. R. (2001). Designing better schools: The meaning and measure of enabling school structures. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 37(3), 296–321.
31.
IvankovaN. V., CreswellJ. W., & StickS. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field methods, 18(1), 3–20.
32.
JacksonS. A., & CsikszentmihalyiM. (1999). Flow in sports: The keys to optimal experiences and performances. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
33.
JacksonS. A., & EklundR. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The flow state scale–2 and dispositional flow scale–2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 133–150.
34.
JacksonS. A., & MarshH. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 17–35.
35.
KurzN. (2006). The relationship between teachers’ sense of academic optimism and commitment to the profession (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
LevittH. M., BambergM., CreswellJ. W., FrostD. M., JosselsonR., & Suárez-OrozcoC. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26.
38.
LipscombS., ChiangH., & GillB. (2012). Value-added estimates for phase 1 of the Pennsylvania teacher and principal evaluation pilot. Full Report. Math-ematica Policy Research, Inc.
39.
MaslowA. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature.New York: Viking.
40.
McCulloughM., LipscombS., ChiangH., GillB., & ChebanI. (2016). Measuring school leaders’ effectiveness: Final report from a multiyear pilot of Pennsyl-vania's framework for leadership (No. afa7e4c19e4140f3b17422e994fc4e1d). Mathematica Policy Research.
41.
MowdayR. T., PorterL. W., & SteersR. M. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. The Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.
42.
MowdayR. T., PorterL. W., & SteersR. M. (1982). Employee-organizational link-ages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
43.
MyersD. G. (2001). Psychology. New York: Worth.
44.
PiroJ., WiemersR., & ShuttT. (2011). Using student achievement data in teacher and principal evaluations: A policy study. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(4), n4.
45.
RiessmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis (vol. 30). Sage.
46.
RietveldT., & Van HoutR. (1993). Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behaviour. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
47.
RossmanG. B., & WilsonB. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627–643.
48.
SandersM. G. (2006). Building school-community partnerships: Collaboration for student success. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin Press.
49.
SchaufeliW. B., BakkerA. B., & SalanovaM. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a brief questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
50.
SchaufeliW. B., SalanovaM., González-RomáV., & BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.
51.
ScheurichJ., GoddardR., SkrlaL., McKenzieK., & YoungsP. (2010). The most important research on urban school reform in the past decade?Educational Researcher, 39(9), 665–667.
52.
SeligmanM. (2011). Flourish. New York, NY: Free Press a division of Simon & Schuster Inc.
53.
SeligmanM., & CsikszentmihalyiM. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.
54.
TashakkoriA., TeddlieC., & TeddlieC. B. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (vol. 46). Sage.
55.
WeissH. B., LopezM. E., KreiderH., & Chatman-NelsonC. (2014). Preparing educators to engage families: Case studies using an ecological system framework (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
