Youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD) encounter a myriad of barriers and challenges when navigating the complexities of the juvenile justice system. Lack of screening and services for youth with I/DD in the juvenile justice system can have long-term negative effects such as recidivism; involvement with the adult justice system; and negative health, educational, and employment outcomes.
Objective
The primary objective of this systematized review was to identify gaps in the literature pertaining to the interactions of juveniles with I/DD within the criminal justice system.
Methods
A systematized literature review was conducted utilizing the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria included articles published between 2013 and 2023, in English, involving youth (under 18) with I/DD in the juvenile justice system.
Results
Seventy-three articles were identified. Of those, 14 met the inclusion criteria. The studies provide insight into prevalence, offense types, severity, comorbidities, risk factors, recidivism, service provision, and competency to stand trial.
Conclusions
To our knowledge, no previous systematized review has examined the intersection of youth with I/DD and the criminal justice system. This systematized review functions as an initial comprehensive examination of the existing literature, consolidating and analyzing research related to I/DD in the juvenile justice system. Findings, implications for policy and practice, and future directions are presented.
AndersonL. L.LarsonS. A.LentzS. M.Hall-LandeJ. (2019). A systematic review of U.S. Studies on the prevalence of intellectual or developmental disabilities since 2000. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 57(5), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-57.5.421
2.
Bleil WaltersJ.HughesT. L.SuttonL. R.MarshallS. N.CrothersL. M.LehmanC.HuangA. (2013). Maltreatment and depression in adolescent sexual offenders with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 22(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2013.735357
3.
ChristensenL.BakerB. L. (2020). Risk-Taking and delinquent behaviors among youth with and without intellectual disabilities. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 13(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2019.1710786
4.
ClarkH. G.MathurS. R.HeldingB. (2011). Transition services for juvenile detainees with disabilities: Findings on recidivism. Education & Treatment of Children, 34(4), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2011.0040
5.
HamiltonS.ReibelT.MaslenS.WatkinsR.JacintaF.PassmoreH.BowerC. (2020). Disability “in-justice”: The benefits and challenges of “yarning” with young people undergoing diagnostic assessment for fetal alcohol Spectrum disorder in a youth detention center. Qualitative Health Research, 30(2), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319882910
6.
HaysM. (2022). Tasteless confinement of juveniles with I/DD: How to keep juvenile offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities out of confinement. Family Court Review, 60(2), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12645
7.
HaysomL.IndigD.MooreE.GaskinC. (2014). Intellectual disability in young people in custody in New South Wales, Australia - prevalence and markers. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58(11), 1004–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12109
8.
HemmingsC.BourasN.2016). Psychiatric and behavioral disorders in intellectual and developmental disabilities (Third edition.). Cambridge University Press.
9.
KincaidA. P.SullivanA. L. (2019). Double jeopardy? Disproportionality in first juvenile court involvement by disability Status. Exceptional Children, 85(4), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918819101
10.
MallettC. A. (2008). The disconnect between youths with mental health and special education disabilities and juvenile court outcomes. Corrections Compendium, 33(5), 1–4,33,34.
11.
McCormickP. C.ThomasB.Van HornS.MangusoR.OehlerS. (2021). Five-Year trends in juvenile adjudicative competency evaluations: One state's consideration of developmental immaturity, age, and psychopathology. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 21(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2020.1804306
12.
MendelR. A., & Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2011). No place for kids the case for reducing juvenile incarceration. The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
13.
MiyaguchiK.ShiratakiS. (2014). Executive functioning problems of juvenile sex offenders with low levels of measured intelligence. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 39(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2014.925103
14.
NajdowskiCynthia JBottomsBette L. (2015). Effects of jurors’ gender and attitudes toward intellectual disability on judgments in cases involving disabled juvenile defendants. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 26(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2015.1017592
15.
NixonM.ThomasS. D. M.DaffernM.OgloffJ. R. P. (2017). Estimating the risk of crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: A data-linkage study. Social Psychiatry And Psychiatric Epidemiology, 52(5), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1371-3
16.
PageM. J.MckenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McdonaldS.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine, 18(3), e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1003583
17.
QuinnM. M.RutherfordR. B.LeoneP. E.OsherD. M.PoirierJ. M. (2005). Youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100308
18.
RadovicR. (2015). Effect of Juror Gender on Attitudes Toward Male and Female Sex Offenders.ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
19.
RussellN. K.Yee TanK.PestellC. F.ConnorS.FitzpatrickJ. P. (2023). Therapeutic recommendations in the youth justice system cohort diagnosed with foetal alcohol Spectrum disorder. Youth Justice, 23(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/14732254211036195
20.
SarrettJ. C.UcarA. (2021). Beliefs about and perspectives of the criminal justice system of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A qualitative study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100122
21.
SedlakA. J.McPhersonK. (2010). Youth’s needs and services. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
22.
SlaughterA. M.HeinS.HongJ. H.MireS. S.GrigorenkoE. L. (2019). Criminal behavior and school discipline in juvenile justice-involved youth with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(6), 2268–2280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03883-8
23.
TanD.FriedmanS. H.ArmstrongC.FitzgeraldJ. T.NeumannC. (2018). New Zealand Youth fitness to stand trial: The impact of age, immaturity and diagnosis on evaluator opinions and court determinations. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 25(3), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1396867
24.
TedeschiF.JunewiczA. (2018). Intellectual disabilities in juvenile justice: The case for screening. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 57(12), 909–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.07.878
25.
U.S. Congress. (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. 20 USC 1400 Public Law 108-446 - 108th Congress.
26.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2024). Disability employment statistics. DOL. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/odep/research-evaluation/statistics
27.
Van der PutC. E.AsscherJ. J.StamsG. J. J. M.MoonenX. M. H. (2014). Differences between juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disabilities in the importance of static and dynamic risk factors for recidivism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58(11), 992–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12078
28.
WeinbergL.HerzD.SmithJ.ChanK. (2019). Reforming juvenile detention for youth with developmental disabilities: I.T. v. Los Angeles county. Justice Evaluation Journal (Online), 2(2), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2019.1625717
29.
WeinbergL. A.SmithJ. M. (2019). Interagency collaboration within juvenile detention to appropriately serve youth with developmental disabilities. Children and Youth Services Review, 103(6), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.06.006
30.
WinstanleyM.WebbR. T.Conti-RamsdenG. (2021). Developmental language disorders and risk of recidivism among young offenders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13299
31.
ZhangD.BarrettD. E.KatsiyannisA.YoonM. (2011). Juvenile offenders with and without disabilities: Risks and patterns of recidivism. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.006
32.
ZhangD.RobertsE.MaddalozzoR.LiY. F.OrsagM.GlassT. (2023). Post-Secondary education outcomes for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Self-determination, independent living, employment, and the impact of COVID-19. Behavioral Sciences, 13(10), 832. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100832
