The benefits of successful integrated employment for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are immense. However, barriers contributing to high rates of unemployment among people with IDD, such as lack of appropriate training for employers and inadequate supports, are still widespread. Ensuring access to technology in the workplace is one method to support employees with IDD and mitigate those barriers. Furthermore, assistive technology may provide a simple and cost-effective intervention in the vocational setting.
OBJECTIVE:
In this study, we conducted a series of focus groups with adults with IDD and their family members to explore the use of technology by individuals with IDD in vocational contexts.
METHODS:
We used a qualitative descriptive approach to frame the study design. Data were analyzed using a multi-cycle thematic coding process.
RESULTS:
Four major themes emerged from the analysis: participants’ wireless/wearable technology use, benefits and facilitators of technology use at work, barriers and challenges to technology use at work, and expectations for and outcomes associated with technology supports in the workplace.
CONCLUSIONS:
Findings have the potential to impact employer education and training on benefits of appropriate technology use for individuals with IDD at work, onboarding and training of individuals with IDD when using technology at work, and funding responsibility for technology in the workplace.
Association of People Supporting Employment First. (2017). APSE Employment First statement. Rockville, MD: Author.Retrieved from http://apse.org/employment-first/statement/
Carlson,D., Ehrlich,N., Berland,B. J., Bailey,N. (2001) Assistive technology survey results: Continued benefits and needs reported by Americans with disabilities, Research Exchange7(1), 17.
4.
Cavkaytar,A. (2017) Effectiveness of teaching cafe waitering to adults with intellectual disability through audio-visual technologies, Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities52(1), 77–90.
5.
Cihak,D. F., Kessler,K. B., Alberto,P. A. (2007) Generalized use of a handheld prompting system, Research in Developmental Disabilities28, 397–408.
6.
Cihak,D. R,., Kessler, K. B., Alberto,P. A. (2008) Use of a hand-held prompting system to transition independently through vocational tasks for students with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities, Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities43, 102–110.
7.
Clark,H. H., Fox TreeJ. E. (2002) Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking, Cognition84, 73–111.
8.
Collins,J. C., Collet-Klingenberg,L. (2017) Portable electronic assistive technology to improve vocational task completion in young adults with an intellectual disability: A review of the literature. JJournal of Intellectual Disabilities, 22(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629516689336.
9.
Davies,D. K., Stock,S., Wehmeyer,M. L., Enhancing independent task performance for individuals with mental retardation through use of a handheld self-directed visual and audio prompting system, Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities37, 209–218.
10.
Davies,D. K., Stock,S., Wehmeyer,M. L., (b). Enhancing independent time-management skills of individuals with mental retardation using a palmtop personal computer, Mental Retardation40, 358–365.
11.
Davies,D. K., Stock,S., Wehmeyer,M. L. (2004) A palmtop computer-based intelligent aid for individuals with intellectual disabilities to increase independent decision making, Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities28, 182–193.
12.
Damianidou,D., Arthur-Kelly,M., Lyons,G., Wehmeyer,M. L. (2019) Technology use to support employment-related outcomes for people with intellectual and developmental disability: An updated meta-analysis. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2018.1439819.
13.
Driscoll,M. P., Rodger,S. A., Jonge,deD. M., (2001, January 1). Factors that prevent or assist the integration of assistive technology into the workplace for people with spinal cord injuries: Perspectives of the users and their employers and co-workers. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation.
14.
Green,J. M., Hughes,E. M., Ryan,J. B. (2011) The use of assistive technology to improve time management skills of a young adult with an intellectual disability. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341102600302.
15.
Jette,A. (2017) The promise of assistive technology to enhance work participation. Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 97(7), 691–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzx054.
Kim,H., Sefcik,J. S., Bradway,C. (2017) Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review. Research in Nursing & Health40, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768.
18.
Lambert,V. A., Lambert,C. E. (2012) Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design, Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research16(4), 255–256.
19.
Larson,S. A., Butterworth,J., Winsor,J., Tanis,S., Lulinski,A., Smith,J. (2021). 30 years of Community Living for individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (1987-2017). Administration for Community Living, US Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC.
20.
Lingard,L. (2019) Beyond the default colon: Effective use of quotes in qualitative research, Perspectives in Medical Education8(6), 360–364
https://10.1007/s40037-019-00550-7.
21.
Michalski,S. C., Ellison,C., Szpak,A., Loetscher,T. (2021) Vocational training in virtual environments for people with neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review, Frontiers in Psychology12, 627301.https://10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627301.
22.
Morash-Macneil,V., Johnson,F., Ryan,J. B. (2018) A systematic review of assistive technology for individuals with intellectual disability in the workplace, Journal of Special Education Technology33(1), 15–26.
23.
Neergaard,M. A., Olesen,F., Andersen,R. S., Sondergaard,J. (2009) Qualitative description - the poor cousin of health research?BMC Medical Research Methodology9, 52.
24.
Randall,K. N., Johnson,F., Adams,S. E., Kiss,C. W., Ryan,J. B. (2020) Use of an iPhone task analysis application to increase employment-related chores for individuals with intellectual disabilities, Journal of Special Education Technology35(1), 26–36.
25.
Stumbo,N. J., Martin,J. K., Hedrick,B. N. (2009) Personal assistance for students with severe physical disabilities in post-secondary education: Is it the deal breaker?Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation30(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2009-0449
The Arc of the United States. (2015). National Policy Matters: WIOA—What it means for people with intellectual and/ordevelopmental disabilities (I/DD) The Arc: Washington, DC.
28.
Van Laarhoven,T., Johnson,J.W., Van Laarhoven-Myers,T., Grider,K. L.,., Grider,K.M., The effectiveness of using a video iPod as a prompting device in employment settings.Journal of Behavioral Education18, 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-009-9077-6.
29.
Walters,S., Stierle,J., Stockwell,D., Carlson,A., Ryan,J. (2021) Efficacy of video prompting using mobile technology to teach employment tasks to individuals with intellectual disability, Journal of Inclusive Postsecondary Education3(1). https://doi.org/10.13021/jipe.2021.2890.
30.
Wehman,P., Taylor,J., Brooke,V., Avellone,L., Whittenburg,H., Ham,W., Molinelli BrookeA., Carr,S. (2018) Toward competitive employment for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities: What progress have we made and where do we need to go? Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities43(3), 131–144https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918777730.
31.
Wehmeyer,M. L., Palmer,S. B., Smith,S. J., Parent,W., Davies,D. K., Stock,S. (2006) Technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to support employment activities: a single-subject design meta-analysis, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation24, 81–86.
32.
Wehmeyer,M. L., Palmer,S. B., Smith,S. J., Davies,D. K., Stock,S. (2008) The efficacy of technology use by people with intellectual disability: a single-subject design meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education Technology23, 21–30https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340802300303.
