Drawing on a survey of the content management (CM) discourse, the author highlights CM trends and articulates best practices in content strategy that CM thought leaders are helping organizations adopt. These trends and practices are changing the nature and location of rhetorical work in organizations that produce intelligent content. In these contexts, rhetorical work is located primarily in the complex activity of building content strategy frameworks that govern text-making activities. The author highlights the need for a praxis-based collaborative model for technical communication education and research, and she offers some preliminary considerations for ways that the field might move in this direction.
AlbersM. J. (2003). Single sourcing and the technical communication career path. TechnicalCommunication, 50, 335–343.
4.
AlbersM. J. (2005). The future of technical communication: Introduction to special issue. Technical Communication, 52, 267–272.
5.
AmesA. L.JensenS. M. (2004, May). Transforming your career: Contributing strategically to your company or client. Paper presented at the 51st Annual STC Conference, Baltimore, MD.
6.
AndersenR. (2011). Component content management: Shaping the discourse through innovation diffusion research and reciprocity. Technical Communication Quarterly, 20, 384–411. doi:10.1080/10572252.2011.590178
BachaJ. (2008). Single sourcing and the return to positivism: The threat of plain-style, arhetorical technical communication practices. In PullmanG.GuB. (Eds.), Content management: Bridging the gap between theory and practice (pp. 143–159). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
BlakesleeA. M. (2009). The technical communication research landscape. Journal of Businessand Technical Communication Quarterly, 23, 129–173. doi:10.1177/1050651908328880
16.
BlakesleeA. M.SpilkaR. (2004). The state of research in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, 73–92. doi:10.1207/S15427625TCQ1301_8
17.
BockG.WaldtD.LaplanteM. (2010, October). Smart content in the enterprise: How next generation XML applications deliver new value to multiple stakeholders. Cambridge, MA: Gilbane Group.
CarlinerS. (2009). Computers and technical communication in the 21st century. In SpilkaR. (Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice (pp. 128–144). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
CarterL. (2003). The implications of single sourcing on writers and writing. Technical Communication, 50, 317–320.
21.
Center for Information-Development Management. (2013, July). Call for research proposals for funded studies through the Center for Information-Development Management. Retrieved from http://www.infomanagementcenter.com/CallForProposal/cfp.htm
22.
ClarkD. (2002). Rhetoric of present single-sourcing methodologies. Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation, Toronto, ON (pp. 20–24). New York, NY: ACM Press.
23.
ClarkD. (2004). Is professional writing relevant? A model for action research. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, 307–323. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1303_5
24.
ClarkD. (2008). Content management and the separation of presentation from form. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17, 35–60. doi:10.1080/10572250701588624
25.
ClarkD.AndersenR. (2005). Renegotiating with technology: Training toward a more sustainable technical communication. Technical Communication, 52, 289–301.
26.
DaytonD. (2006). A hybrid analytical framework to guide studies of innovative IT adoption by work groups. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, 355–382. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1503_5
27.
DaytonD.HopperK. (2010). Single sourcing and content management: A survey of STC members. Technical Communication, 57, 375–397.
28.
DicksS. (2002). Cultural impediments to understanding: Are they surmountable? In MirelB.SpilkaR. (Eds.), Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century (pp. 13–25). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
DicksS. (2009). The effects of digital literacy on the nature of technical communication work. In SpilkaR. (Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice (pp. 51–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
DobrinD. N. (1989). Writing and technique. Champaign, IL: NCTE.
31.
Ericsson. (2012). Ericsson: 85 percent of the world’s population covered by high-speed mobile Internet in 2017 [Press release]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ericsson.com/news/1617338
32.
FaberB.Johnson-EilolaJ. (2002). Migrations: Strategic thinking about the future. In MirelB.SpilkaR. (Eds.), Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century (pp. 135–148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
GuB.PullmanG. (2008). Mapping out the key parameters of content management. In PullmanG.GuB. (Eds.), Content management: Bridging the gap between theory and practice (pp. 1–12). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
HackosJ. (2009). Foreword. In SpilkaR. (Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice (pp. 7–10). New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
HackosJ. (2010). Keynote panel: State of the industry. Keynote address presented at the Content Management Strategies/DITA North America Conference, Santa Clara, CA.
41.
Hart-DavidsonW. (2001). On writing, technical communication, and information technology: The core competencies of technical communication. Technical Communication, 48, 145–155.
42.
Hart-DavidsonW. (2009). Content management: Beyond single-sourcing. In SpilkaR. (Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice (pp. 128–144). New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
Hart-DavidsonW.ZachryM.SpinuzziC. (2012, October). Activity streams: Building context to coordinate writing activity in collaborative teams. In SIGDOC ’12: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 279–287). New York, NY: ACM.
44.
JacksonB.PerrottaP. (2012). Sailing the wine-dark sea: The transformation from technical publications to information experience [PowerPoint slides]. Paper presented at the CIDM Best Practices Conference 2012, Monterey, CA.
45.
JohnsonR. (1998). User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
46.
Johnson-EilolaJ. (1996). Relocating the value of work: Technical communication in a post-industrial age. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5, 245–270. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq0503_1
47.
JonesC. (2012, May). Make your content matter: Become a Jedi master of the digital universe [PowerPoint slides]. Paper presented at the Society for Technical Communication Summit 2012, Chicago, IL. Retrieved fromhttp://www.slideshare.net/leenjones/make-your-content-matter
LovingerR. (2011, May). Make your content nimble [PowerPoint slides]. Paper presented at Confab: The Content Strategy Conference 2011, Minneapolis, MN. Retrieved from the SlideShare Web site:http://www.slideshare.net/rlovinger/make-your-content-nimble
50.
McDanielR.StewardS. (2011). Technical communication pedagogy and the broadband divide: Academic and industrial perspectives. In LambertiA. P.RichardsA. R. (Eds.), Complex worlds: Digital culture, rhetoric, and professional communication (pp. 195–212). Amityville, NY: Baywood Press.
51.
MillerC. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40, 610–617.
52.
MillerC. R. (1989). What’s practical about technical writing. In FearingB. E.SparrowW. K. (Eds.), Technical writing: Theory and practice (pp. 14–24). New York, NY: Modern Language Association.
53.
MirelB.SpilkaR. (2002). Introduction. In MirelB.SpilkaR. (Eds.), Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century (pp. 1–6). Mahway, NJ: Routledge.
MolisaniJ.AbelS. (2012, February). Tech comm 2.0: Reinventing our relevance in the 2000s. Intercom, 14–18.
56.
MyersK. (2010). Revolutionizing product content: Using social content and media to revitalize product documentation. In BoikoB.HartmanE. M. (Eds.), Information management best practices (pp. 189–200): Utrecht, the Netherlands: Hartman Communicatie.
O'KeefeS.PringleA. S. (2012). Content strategy 101: Transform technical content into a critical asset. Retrieved fromhttp://www.contentstrategy101.com/
59.
PenningtonL. (2007). Surviving the design and implementation of a content-management system: Do the benefits offset the challenges?Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21, 62–73. doi:10.1177/1050651906293530
60.
PringleK.WilliamsS. (2005). The future is the past: Has technical communication arrived as a profession?Technical Communication, 52, 361–370.
61.
PullmanG.GuB. (2008). Guest editors’ introduction: Rationalizing and rhetoricizing content management. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17, 1–9. doi:10.1080/10572250701588558
62.
ReichR. (1992). The work of nations. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
63.
RobidouxC. (2008). Rhetorically structured content: Developing a collaborative single-sourcing curriculum. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17, 110–135. doi:10.1080/10572250701595652
64.
RockleyA. (2010). Managing content: An intelligent content strategy. In BoikoB.HartmanE. M. (Eds.), Information management best practices (pp. 269–277): Utrecht,
the Netherlands: Hartman Communicatie.
65.
RockleyA. (2011a, February 16.). Intelligent content eye-opener: Content strategy. Paper presented at the Intelligent Content Conference 2011, Palm Springs, CA.
RockleyA.CooperC. (2012). Managing enterprise content: A unified content strategy (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
68.
RudeC. (2009). Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23, 174–215. doi:10.1177/1050651908329562
69.
SalvoM. (2004). Rhetorical action in professional space: Information architecture as critical practice. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18, 39–66. doi:10.1177/1050651903258129
70.
SalvoM.RosinskiP. (2009). Information design: From authoring text to architecting virtual space. In SpilkaR. (Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice (pp. 103–127). New York, NY: Routledge.
71.
SapienzaF. (2004). Usability, structured content, and single sourcing with XML. TechnicalCommunication, 51, 399–408.
72.
SapienzaF. (2007). A rhetorical approach to single-sourcing via intertextuality. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16, 83–101. doi:10.1080/10572250709336578
73.
SchwartzH.GettingerC. (2010, April). Dynamic publishing: The ultimate end-game of DITA deployment [PowerPoint slides]. Paper presented at the Content Management Strategies/DITA North America Conference, Santa Clara, CA.
SlatteryS. (2005). Technical writing as textual coordination: An argument for the value of writers’ skill with information technology. Technical Communication, 52, 353–360.
77.
SlatteryS. (2007). Undistributing work through writing: How technical writers manage texts in complex information environments. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16, 311–325. doi:10.1080/10572250701291046
78.
SpilkaR. (2009). Introduction. In SpilkaR. (Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
79.
SpinuzziC. (2007). Who killed Rex? Tracing a message through three kinds of networks. In ZachryM.ThrallsC. (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp. 45–66). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
SwartsJ. (2007). Mobility and composition: The architecture of coherence in non-places. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16, 279–309. doi:10.1080/10572250701291020
82.
SwartsJ. (2010). Recycled writing: Assembling actor networks from reusable content. Journalof Business and Technical Communication, 24, 127–163. doi:10.1177/1050651909353307
83.
SwartsJ. (2011). Technological literacy as network building. Technical Communication Quarterly, 20, 274–302. doi:10.1080/10572252.2011.578239
84.
TebeauxE. (2003). Returning to our roots: Gaining power through the culture of engagement. In Kynell-HuntT.SavageG. (Eds.), Power and legitimacy in technical communication, volume I: The historical and contemporary struggle for professional status (pp. 21–50). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
85.
The Rockley Group. (2013). Content Strategy—Planning for Success. Retrieved fromhttp://rockley.com/services/
86.
TrotterP. (2011a, February). Intelligent content—Future trends, future solutions [PowerPoint Slides]. Intelligent Content Conference 2011, Palm Springs, CA.
WhittemoreS. (2008). Metadata and memory: Lessons from the canon of memoria for the design of content management systems. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17, 77–98. doi:10.1080/10572250701590893
91.
WilsonG. (2001). Technical communication and late capitalism: Considering a postmodern technical communication pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 72–99. doi:10.1177/1050651901015001
