Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article follows up on the conversation about new streams of approaches in technical communication and user experience (UX) design, i.e., design thinking, content strategy, and artificial intelligence (AI), which afford implications for professional practice. By extending such implications to technical communication pedagogy, we aim to demonstrate the importance of paying attention to these streams in our programmatic development and provide strategies for doing so.

Keywords

design thinking content strategy artificial intelligence user experience pedagogy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Awad

Dsouza

Bonnefon

J. F.

Shariff

Rahwan

(2020). Crowdsourcing moral machines. Communications of the ACM, 63(3), 48–55. https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2020/3/243030-crowdsourcing-moral-machines/fulltext. https://doi.org/10.1145/3339904

Barad

(2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

Barbetta

(2019). Is my car evil? A review of non-anthropocentric theories of moral agency. 教員研究論文 , (96), 107–120. http://www.iii.u-tokyo.ac.jp/manage/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/96_8.pdf .

Barker

(1990). Software documentation: From instruction to integration. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 33(4), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.62811

Barnett

Boyle

(Eds.) (2016). Rhetoric, through everyday things. University of Alabama Press.

Bay

Johnson-Sheehan

Cook

(2018). Design thinking via experiential learning: Thinking like an entrepreneur in technical communication courses. Programmatic Perspectives, 10(1), 172–200.

Bennett

(2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

Blythe

Lauer

Curran

P. G.

(2014). Professional and technical communication in a web 2.0 world. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(4), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2014.941766

Boettger

R. K.

Ishizaki

(2018). Introduction to the special issue: Data-driven approaches to research and teaching in professional and technical communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(4), 352–355. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2018.2870547

10.

Bogost

(2012). Alien phenomenology, or, what it's like to be a thing. U of Minnesota Press.

11.

Breuch

L. A. K.

Zachry

Spinuzzi

(2001). Usability instruction in technical communication programs: New directions in curriculum development. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/105065190101500204

12.

Bridgeford

(Ed.) (2020). Teaching content management in technical and professional communication. Routledge.

13.

Brumberger

Lauer

(2015). The evolution of technical communication: An analysis of job industry postings. Technical Communication, 62(4), 224–243.

14.

Caernarven-Smith

(1985). Computers and communication. Technical Communication, 32(3), 38–43.

15.

Cham

Shakiry

Yates

(2021). Dual cognitive UXD and explainable AI. Journal of Usability Studies, 17(1), 1–11.

16.

Chong

(2017). Implementing usability testing in introductory technical communication service courses: Results and lessons from a local study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(2), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2771698

17.

Clark

(2016). Content strategy: An integrative literature review. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2537080

18.

Clegg

Lauer

Phelps

Melonçon

(2020). Programmatic outcomes in undergraduate technical and professional communication programs. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2020.1774662

19.

Colton

J. S.

Holmes

Walwema

(2017). From NoobGuides to #OpKKK: Ethics of Anonymous’ tactical technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1257743

20.

Cooke

(2010). Assessing concurrent think-aloud protocol as a usability method: A technical communication approach. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2010.2052859

21.

Coon

A. C.

Scanlon

P. M.

(1997). Does the curriculum fit the career? Some conclusions from a survey of graduates of a degree program in professional and technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 27(4), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.2190/TL92-LKAT-C963-88WP

22.

Cross

(2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Bloomsbury Publishing.

23.

Dorst

(2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2006.22.3.4

24.

Dorst

(2011). The core of “design thinking” and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006

25.

Duin

A. H.

Moses

McGrath

Tham

Ernst

(2017). Design thinking methodology: A case study of “radical collaboration” in the wearables research collaboratory. Connexion: An International Professional Communication Journal, 5(1), 45–74.

26.

Duin

A. H.

Pedersen

(2021). Writing futures: Collaborative, algorithmic, autonomous. Springer.

27.

Duncan

(2021). Expanding ethical pedagogy in technical communication: Learning from killer nanobots. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1–13. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2021.1977850

28.

Earley

(2016). There is no AI without IA. IT Professional, 18(3), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2016.43

29.

Earley

(2018). AI, chatbots and content, oh my! (or technical writers are doomed—to lifelong employment). Intercom, 65(1), 12–14.

30.

Evia

(2019). Creating intelligent content with lightweight DITA. Routledge.

31.

Faber

Bekins

Karis

(2002). Using corporate-based methods to assess technical communication programs. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 32(4), 307–336. https://doi.org/10.2190/T2HC-KXTD-7YFK-4PFV

32.

Floridi

Cowls

Beltrametti

Chatila

Chazerand

Dignum

Luetge

Madelin

Pagallo

Rossi

Schafer

Valcke

Vayena

(2018). AI4People—an Ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

33.

Geisler

Bazerman

Doheny-Farina

Gurak

Haas

Johnson-Eilola

Kaufer

D. S.

Lunsford

Miller

C. R.

Winsor

Yates

(2001). IText: Future directions for research on the relationship between information technology and writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(3), 269–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/105065190101500302

34.

Getto

Labriola

J. T.

Ruszkiewicz

(Eds.) (2020). Content strategy in technical communication. Routledge.

35.

Graham

S. S.

Hopkins

H. R.

(2021). AI For social justice: New methodological horizons in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1–14. Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2021.1955151

36.

Gries

(2015). Still life with rhetoric: A new materialist approach for visual rhetorics. Utah State University Press.

37.

Gurak

Duin

A. H.

(2004). The impact of the Internet and digital technologies on teaching and research in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1302_4

38.

Haenlein

Kaplan

(2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925

39.

Hagendorff

(2020). AI virtues––The missing link in putting AI ethics into practice. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.12750.

40.

Hall

(2018). Conversational design. A Book Apart.

41.

Halvorson

(2008). The discipline of content strategy. https://alistapart.com/article/thedisciplineofcontentstrategy/.

42.

Harman

(2018). Object-oriented ontology: A new theory of everything. Penguin.

43.

Hart-Davidson

(2009). Content management: Beyond single-sourcing. In Spilka

(Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice (pp. 144–160). Routledge.

44.

Hart-Davidson

Bernhardt

McLeod

Rife

Grabill

J. T.

(2007). Coming to content management: Inventing infrastructure for organizational knowledge work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 10–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250701588608

45.

Henschel

Melonçon

(2014). Of horsemen and layered literacies: Assessment instruments for aligning technical and professional communication undergraduate curricula with professional expectations. Programmatic Perspectives, 6(1), 3–26.

46.

Howard

(1994). Technical writing and computers. Encyclopedia of English and Language Studies. NCTE.

47.

Howard

(2020). Teaching content strategy to graduate students with real clients. In Getto

Labriola

Ruszkiewicz

(Eds.), Content strategy in technical communication (pp. 119–153). Routledge.

48.

IDEO Design Kit (n.d.). Clean team: In-home toilets for Ghana’s urban poor. https://www.designkit.org/case-studies/1.

49.

Johnson-Eilola

(1996). Relocating the value of work: Technical communication in a post-industrial age. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5(3), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq0503_1

50.

Jones

Gouge

(2018). Wearable technologies and communication design. Communication Design Quarterly, 5(4), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3188387.3188388

51.

Kalbach

(2020). The jobs to be done playbook. Two Waves Books.

52.

Kelly

(2013). Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us all. Random House.

53.

Kessler

M. M.

Breuch

L. A. K.

Stambler

D. M.

Campeau

Riggins

O. J.

Feedema

Doornink

S. I.

Misono

(2021). User experience in health & medicine: Building methods for patient experience design in multidisciplinary collaboration. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(4), 380–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211044498

54.

Kimbell

(2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and culture, 3(3), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216

55.

Kimbell

(2012). Rethinking design thinking: Part II. Design and culture, 4(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470812X13281948975413

56.

Klein

(Ed.) (2021). Effective teaching of technical communication: Theory, practice, and application. The WAC Clearinghouse/University Press of Colorado.

57.

Kumar

(2018). Artificial intelligence: definition, types, examples, technologies. Medium.com. Retrieved November 19, 2019 from: https://medium.com/@chethankumargn/artificial-intelligence-definition-types-examples-technologies-962ea75c7b9b.

58.

Lanius

Weber

Robinson

(2021). User experience methods in research and practice. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(4), 350–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211044499

59.

Latour

(2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.

60.

Lauer

(2015). High-tech invention: Examining the relationship between technology and idea generation in the document design process. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(4), 367–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651915588146

61.

Lauer

Brumberger

(2016). Technical communication as user experience in a broadening industry landscape. Technical Communication, 63(3), 248–264.

62.

Lauer

Brumberger

(2017). Content development as multimodal editing in the web 2.0 workplace. In Keller

(Ed.), SIGDOC ‘17: The 35th ACM international conference on the design of communication (pp. 1–9). ACM.

63.

Lovinger

(2007). Content strategy: The philosophy of data. https://boxesandarrows.com/content-strategy-the-philosophy-of-data/.

64.

Mateas

Domike

Vanouse

(1999). Terminal time: An ideologically biased history machine. AISB Quarterly, 102, 36–43.

65.

Maylath

Grabill

J. T.

(2009). The council for programs in technical and scientific communication at 35 years: A sequel and perspective. Programmatic Perspectives, 1(1), 29–44.

66.

McCarthy

(2007). What is artificial intelligence? Stanford University. http://35.238.111.86:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/274/1/McCarthy_John_What%20is%20artificial%20intelligence.pdf.

67.

McCorduck

(2004). Machines who think: A personal inquiry into the history and prospects of artificial intelligence. W. H. Freeman.

68.

McGovern

(2007). Training teachers and serving students: Applying usability testing in writing programs. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37(3), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.37.3.f

69.

Melonçon

Henschel

(2013). Current state of US undergraduate degree programs in technical and professional communication. Technical Communication, 60(1), 45–64.

70.

Miller

C. R.

(2007). What can automation tell us about agency? Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940601021197

71.

Nielsen Norman Group (2016). Design thinking 101. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/design-thinking/.

72.

Noessel

(2017). Designing agentive technology: AI that works for people. Rosenfeld Media.

73.

Norman

(2010, Jun. 25). Design thinking. A useful myth? Core77. https://www.core77.com/posts/16790/design-thinking-a-useful-myth-16790.

74.

Norman

(2013). The design of everyday things. Revised edition. Basic Books.

75.

O’Keefe

Pringle

(2017). Structured authoring and XML. Scriptorium Publishing Services, Inc. https://www.scriptorium.com/2017/04/structured-authoring-and-xml/.

76.

Pearsall

Warren

(1996). The council for programs in technical and scientific communication: A retrospective. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 26(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.2190/168U-Y025-X4W3-JVUV

77.

Pellegrini

(2021). Composing like an entrepreneur: The pedagogical implications of design thinking in the workplace. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1–18. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211031554

78.

Pflugfelder

E. H.

(2016). Communicating mobility and technology: A material rhetoric for persuasive transportation. Routledge.

79.

Pope-Ruark

(2019). Design thinking in technical and professional communication: Four perspectives. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919854094

80.

Pope-Ruark

Moses

Tham

(2019). Iterating the literature: An early annotated bibliography of design-thinking resources. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919854096

81.

Priestley

Hargis

Carpenter

(2001). DITA: An XML-based technical documentation authoring and publishing architecture. Technical Communication, 48(3), 352–367.

82.

Raju

(2017). Design mindsets. Medium. https://medium.com/a-journey-to-design-thinking/design-mindsets-756bc69aed0d.

83.

Ranade

(2020). The real-time audience: Data analytics and audience measurements. Proceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1145/3380851.3418613.

84.

Ranade

Catá

(2021). Intelligent algorithms: Evaluating the design of chatbots and search. Technical Communication, 68(2), 22–40.

85.

Redish

(2010). Technical communication and usability: Intertwined strands and mutual influences. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2010.2052861

86.

Redish

Barnum

(2011). Overlap, influence, intertwining: The interplay of UX and technical communication. Journal of Usability Studies, 6(3), 90–101.

87.

Rickert

(2013). Ambient rhetoric: The attunements of rhetorical being. University of Pittsburgh Press.

88.

Rittel

Webber

(1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

89.

Rockley

Cooper

Abel

(2015). Intelligent content: A primer. XML Press.

90.

Rose, E. & Schreiber, J. (2021). User experience and technical communication: Beyond intertwining. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(4), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211044497

91.

Rose

E. J.

Walton

(2015, July). Factors to actors: Implications of posthumanism for social justice work. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: ACM.

92.

Russell

Norvig

(2009). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.

93.

Sapienza

(2002). Does being technical matter? XML, single source, and technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 32(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.2190/PCK7-MX24-X113-V9DC

94.

Schell

(2018). Design thinking has a pedagogy problem… and a way forward. Journal of Design and Creative Technologies, 2, https://designcreativetech.utexas.edu/design-thinking-has-pedagogy-problem-way-forward.

95.

Selber

(1994). Beyond skill building: Challenges facing technical communication teachers in the computer age. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3(4), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572259409364578

96.

Shivers-McNair

Phillips

Campbell

Mai

H. H.

Yan

Macy

J. F.

Wenlock

Fry

Guan

(2018). User-centered design in and beyond the classroom: Toward an accountable practice. Computers and Composition, 49, 36–47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461518300379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.05.003

97.

Smith

(2018). The AI delusion. Oxford University Press.

98.

Sommaggio

Marchiori

(2020). Moral dilemmas in the AI era: A new approach. Journal of Ethics and Legal Technologies, 2(1), n.p. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-jelt-2020-1-5

99.

Spyridakis

(2000). Guidelines for authoring comprehensible web pages and evaluating their success. Technical Communication, 47(3), 301–310.

100.

St.Amant

(2021). Cognition, care, and usability: Applying cognitive concepts to user experience design in health and medical contexts. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(4), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281620981567

101.

Stanford d.school (n.d.). Design thinking bootcamp bootleg. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57c6b79629687fde090a0fdd/t/58890239db29d6cc6c3338f7/1485374014340/METHODCARDS-v3-slim.pdf.

102.

Still

(2010). The blank-page technique: Reinvigorating paper prototyping in usability testing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2010.2046100

103.

Szczepanska

(2017). Design thinking origin story plus some of the people who made it all happen. Medium. https://medium.com/@szczpanks/design-thinking-where-it-came-from-and-the-type-of-people-who-made-it-all-happen-dc3a05411e53.

104.

Terragni

Hassani

(2018, August). Analyzing customer journey with process mining: From discovery to recommendations. 2018 IEEE 6th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud) (pp. 224–229). IEEE.

105.

Tham

(2018a). Interactivity in an age of immersive media: Seven dimensions for wearable technology, internet of things, and technical communication. Technical Communication, 65(1), 46–65.

106.

Tham

(2018b). The scalability of design thinking in technical and professional communication programs: Two course deployment examples. In T. Carnegie, S. Miksch, R. Alhmeyrat, & E. Dean (Eds.), Proceedings for the 2018 CPTSC Annual Conference (pp. 68–69). https://cptsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2018_CPTSC_conference.pdf.

107.

Tham

(2021a). Engaging design thinking and making in technical and professional communication pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(4), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2020.1804619

108.

Tham

(2021b). Design thinking in first-year composition: Writing social innovation into service-learning pedagogy. Currents in Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 11–24.

109.

Tham

Duin

A. H.

Gee

Ernst

Abdelqader

McGrath

(2018a). Understanding virtual reality: Presence, embodiment, and professional practice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2018.2804238

110.

Tham

McGrath

Duin

A. H.

Moses

(2018b). Wearable technology, ubiquitous computing, and immersive experience: Implications for writing studies. Computers and Composition, 50, 1–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.08.001

111.

Thomson

J. J.

(1976). Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197659224

112.

Urchukov

(2020). Design thinking and its democratizing power. Medium. https://uxdesign.cc/design-thinking-and-its-democratizing-power-c1d27176603c.

113.

Verhulsdonck

Howard

Tham

(2021). Investigating the impact of design thinking, content strategy, and artificial intelligence: A “streams” approach for technical communication and user experience. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(4), 468–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211041951

114.

Verhulsdonck

Melton

Shah

(2019). Disconnecting to connect: Developing postconnectivist tactics for mobile and networked technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1588377

115.

Verhulsdonck

Shalamova

(2020). Creating content that influences people: Considering user experience and behavioral design in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 50(4), 376–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281619880286

116.

Verhulsdonck, G., & Shah, V. (2021). Making actionable metrics “actionable”: The role of affordances and behavioral design in data dashboards. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 36(1), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519211044502

117.

Verhulsdonck

Tham

(Forthcoming). Tactical (dis)connection in smart cities: Postconnectivist technical communication for a datafied world. Technical Communication Quarterly. In-press.

118.

Weedon, S. (2019). The core of Kees Dorst’s design thinking. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919854077

119.

Welchman

(2015). Managing chaos: Digital governance by design. Rosenfeld Media.

120.

Wible

(2020). Using design thinking to teach creative problem solving in writing courses. College Composition and Communication, 71(3), 399–425.

121.

Zappen

J. P.

Geisler

(2009). Designing the total user experience: Implications for research and program development. Programmatic Perspectives, 1(1), 3–28.

122.

Zimmerman

(2001). Technical communication in an altered technology landscape: What might be. Technical Communication, 48(2), 200–205.

Extending Design Thinking,Content Strategy,and Artificial Intelligence into Technical Communication and User Experience Design Programs: Further Pedagogical Implications

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References