Institute of Medicine reports have identified gaps in health care professionals' knowledge of palliative and end-of-life care, recommending improved education. Our purpose was to develop and administer a Web-based survey to identify the educational needs of multidisciplinary health care professionals who provide this care in Connecticut to inform educational initiatives. We developed an 80-item survey and recruited participants through the Internet and in person. Descriptive and correlational statistics were calculated on 602 surveys. Disciplines reported greater agreement on items related to their routine tasks. Reported needs included dealing with cultural and spiritual matters and having supportive resources at work. Focus groups confirmed results that are consistent with National Consensus Project guidelines for quality palliative care and indicate the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium modules for education.
Field MJ, Cassel CK, eds. Institute of Medicine. Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.
2.
Hewitt M, Simone JD, eds. Institute of Medicine. Ensuring Quality of Cancer Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
3.
Foley KM, Gelband H, eds. Improving Palliative Care for Cancer. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001 .
4.
Trice ED, Prigerson HGCommunication in end-stage cancer: review of the literature and future research . J Health Commun.2009;14(1):95-108.
5.
Fine E., Reid MC, Shengelia R., Adelman RDDirectly observed patient-physician discussions in palliative and end-of-life care: a systematic review of the literature. J Palliat Med . 2010;13(5): 595-603.
6.
Anselm AH, Palda V., Guest CB, et al. Barriers to communication regarding end-of-life care: perspectives of care providers. J Crit Care. 2005;20(3):214-23.
7.
Bradley EH, Hallemeier AG, Fried TR, et al. Documentation of discussions about prognosis with terminally ill patients. Am J Med. 2001;111(3):218-23.
8.
Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K., et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the support project. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(Suppl):S187-S193.
9.
Davison SNEnd-of-life care preferences and needs: perceptions of patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 ;5:195-204.
10.
Mularski RA , Heine CE, Osborne ML, et al. Quality of dying in the ICU: ratings by family members. Chest. 2005;128:280-287.
11.
The Support Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274(20):1591-1598.
12.
Heiman H., Bates DW, Fairchild D., Shaykevich S., Lehmann LSImproving completion of advance directives in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med. 2004 ;117: 318-324.
13.
Levin TT, Li Y., Weiner JS, et al. How do-not-resuscitate orders are utilized in cancer patients: timing relative to death and communication-training implications. Palliat Support Care. 2008;6(4):341-348.
14.
Finlay E., Casarett D.Making difficult discussions easier: using prognosis to facilitate transitions to hospice. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:250-263.
15.
National Trend Summary 2004. Washington, DC: National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization; 2006 .
16.
Miller SC, Weitzen S., Kinzbrunner B.Factors associated with the high prevalence of short hospice stays. J Palliat Med. 2003;6: 725-736.
17.
Naik A., DeHaven MJShort stays in hospice. A review & update. Caring. 2001;20(2):10-13.
18.
Bradley EH, Fried TR, Kasl SV, Cicchetti DV, Johnson-Hurzeler R., Horwitz SMReferral of terminally ill patients for hospice: frequency and correlates . J Palliat Care. 2000;16(4):20-26.
19.
Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M., McIntyre L., Tulsky JAFactors considered important at the end-of-life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284(19):2476-2482.
20.
Connecticut Cancer Partnership, 2009, Connecticut Cancer Plan 2009-2010.
21.
Connecticut Department of Health Death Registry.Unpublished analysis of 2006 Place of Death Data.
22.
American Academy of Hospice & Palliative Care Medicine.Certification overview. http://www.association-office.com/ABHPM/etools/publicdir/Search.cfm
23.
24.
25.
Bradley EH, Cicchetti DV, Fried TR, et al. Attitudes about care at the end of life among clinicians: a quick, reliable and valid assessment instrument. J Palliat Care. 2000;16:6-14.
26.
City of Hope Pain/Palliative Care Resource Center.Instruments used in End of Life (EOL) care education . http://prc.coh.org/res_inst.asp
27.
The Massachusetts Commission on End-of-Life Care, End-of-Life Care Survey. Septmember 2005. www.endoflifecommission.org
28.
Teno JM, Clarridge B., Casey V., Edgman-Levitan S., Fowler J.Validation of toolkit after-death bereaved family member interview. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22(3):752-758.
29.
Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V., et al. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004;291(1): 88-93.
30.
Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Engelberg RA, Norris K., Asp C., Byock I.A measure of the quality of dying and death. Initial validation using after-death interviews with family members. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;24(1):17-31.
31.
Bradley EH, Curry L., Devers K.Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1758-1772.
32.
Glaser B., Strauss A.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967.
33.
Miles MB, Huberman AMQualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications;1994 .
34.
National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care.National Consensus Project Clinical Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. 2nd ed. 2009.
35.
Schlairet MCEnd-of-life nursing care: Statewide survey of nurses’ education needs and effects of education. J Prof Nurs.2009;25(3):170-177.
