Objective: According to a prior study, there are substantial lapses in journal coverage in the Social Work Abstracts (SWA) database. The current study provides a replication and extension. Method: The longitudinal pattern of coverage of thirty-three journals categorized in SWA as core journals (published in the 1989-1996 period) is examined. Results: The proportion of issues missing from SWA is significantly greater than 0, increase over time, and is significantly biased in favor of NASW journals. Conclusion: The errors in SWA reported here, combined with those previously reported, will exert a long-term negative impact on scholarship unless their existence becomes known to all SWA users and they take steps to compensate for the situation.
Baker, D.R. ( 1990). Citation analysis: A methodological review. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 26, 3-10.
2.
Baker, D.R. ( 1991). On-line bibliometric analysis for researchers and educators . Journal of Social Work Education, 27, 41-47.
3.
Bar-Ilan, J., Peritz, B.C., & Wolman, Y. ( 2003). A survey on the use of electronic databases and electronic journals accessed through the Web by the academic staff of Israeli universities . Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29, 346-361.
4.
Beall, J. ( 2007). Search fatigue: Finding a cure for the database blues . American Libraries, 38, 46-50.
5.
Beebe, L., & Payne, A.H. ( 1989). Users guide to Social Work Abstracts. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers .
6.
Briggs, T.L. ( 1975). A critique of the NASW manpower statement. Journal of Education for Social Work, 11(1), 9-15.
7.
Cliff, N. ( 1987). Analyzing multivariate data. New York : Harcourt Brace.
8.
Cohen, D., Wong, S.E., Gomory, T., Lacasse, J., Saleeby, D., Kirk, S.A., et al. (2006). Open letter to NASW regarding "adherence initiative for schizophrenia" sponsored by Janssen, L. P. Available from http://www.manufacturedconsensus.net/
9.
Elsevier. (2008). Elsevier announces 2007 journal impact factor highlights. Retrieved July 19, 2008, from http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authored_newsitem.cws_home/companynews05_00961
10.
Flatley, R.K., Lilla, R., & Widner, J. ( 2007). Choosing a database for social work: A comparison of Social Work Abstracts and Social Service Abstracts. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33, 47-55.
11.
Garfield, E. ( 1996). How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal, 313, 411-413.
12.
Green, R., Baskind, F., & Bellin, M. ( 2002). Robert Green, Frank Baskind, and Melissa Bellin reply . Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 492-495.
13.
Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. ( 2005a). Tracing thought through time and space: A selective review of bibliometrics in social work. Social Work in Health Care, 41, 1-34.
14.
Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. ( 2005b). Shallow science or meta-cognitive insights: A few thoughts on bibliometrics. Social Work in Health Care , 41, 129-148.
15.
Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., Barker, K., & Onghena, P. ( 2006). An assessment of the predictive validity of impact factor scores: Implications for academic employment decisions in social work . Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 613-624.
16.
Holden, G., Barker, K., Covert-Vail, L., Rosenberg, G., & Cohen, S.A. ( 2008a). Does Social Work Abstracts work?Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 487-499.
17.
Holden, G., Thyer, B., Baer, J.C., Delva, J., Dulmus, C., & Shanks, T.R.W. (2008b). Suggestions to improve social work journal editorial and peer review processes: The San Antonio response to the Miami statement. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 66-71.
18.
Jacoby, B.E., Murray, J., Alterman, I., & Welbourne, P. ( 2002). Resource selection for an interdisciplinary field: A methodology. Journal of the Medical Library Association , 90, 393-399.
19.
Jacsó, P. ( 1998). Analyzing the journal coverage of abstracting/indexing databases at variable aggregate and analytic levels. Library & Information Science Research, 20, 133-151.
20.
Jenson, J. ( 2005). Structural factors and the quality of publication in social work journals. Social Work Research, 29, 67-71.
21.
Kemp, B.E., & Brustman, M.J. (1997). Social policy research: Comparison and analysis of CD-ROM resources. Social Work Research, 21, 111-120.
22.
Kirk, S.A. ( 1984). Methodological issues in the comparative study of schools of social work. Journal of Social Service Research , 7(3), 59-73.
23.
Kmetz, T. ( 2005). Social Work Abstracts (OVID) and Social Services Abstracts (CSA). Charleston Advisor, 7(2), 14-17.
24.
Leighninger, R.D. ( 2006). The perils of self-censorship. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 33(4), 9-10.
25.
Lindsey, D. ( 1978). The scientific publication system in social science . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Lindsey, D. ( 1980). Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10, 145-162.
27.
Lindsey, D. ( 1982). Further evidence for adjusting for multiple authorship . Scientometrics, 4, 389-395.
28.
Lindsey, D. ( 1989). Using citation counts as a measure of quality in science: Measuring what’s measurable rather than what’s valid . Scientometrics, 15, 189-203.
29.
Lindsey, D., & Kirk, S.A. ( 1992). The role of social work journals in the development of a knowledge base for the profession. Social Service Review , 66, 295-310.
30.
MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40, 342-349.
31.
MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1992). Problems of citation analysis . Social Work Research and Abstracts, 28, 4.
32.
Mendelsohn, H.N. ( 1984). Social work online. Database, 7(3), 36-49.
33.
Mendelsohn, H.N. ( 1986). Searching Social Work Abstracts: A review. Database, 9(1), 22-27.
34.
Midgley, J. ( 2006). International social work, globalization and the challenge of a unipolar world. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare , 33(4), 11-18.
35.
NASW-FL. (2007). Presenter contract for the New Directions in Professional Social Work conference . Tallahassee, FL: Author.
36.
NASW Press. (2008a). NASW press. Available from http://www.naswpress.org/
37.
NASW Press. ( 2008 b). Writing for NASW press: Journal descriptions. Retrieved May 6, 2008, http://www.naswpress.org/authors/guidelines/04-journals.html.
38.
Pachter, W.S., Fox, R.E., Zimbardo, P., & Antonuccio, D.O. (2007). Corporate funding and conflicts of interest: A primer for psychologists. American Psychologist , 62, 1005-1015.
39.
Phelan, T.J. ( 1999). A compendium of issues for citation analysis. Scientometrics, 45, 117-136.
40.
Sage. (2008). Sage announces strong performance in 2007 journal citation reports. Retrieved July 12, 2008, from http://www.sage-pub.co.uk/repository/binaries/doc/ISI_results_08.doc
41.
Schilling, R., Baer, J.C., Barth, R., Fraser, M., Herman, D., Holden, G., et al. (2005). Peer review and publication standards in social work journals: The Miami Statement. Social Work Research , 29, 119-121.
42.
Seringhaus, M.R., & Gerstein, M.B. (2007). Publishing perishing? Towards tomorrow’s information architecture. BMC Bioinformatics , 8. Retrieved September 23, 2007 , from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/17
43.
Shek, D.T.L. ( 2008). Comprehensiveness of Social Work Abstracts as a database for researchers and practitioners. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 500-506.
44.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45.
Social Work Librarians Group. (2000, February 26). Librarians group business meeting minutes. New York. Available from http://www.cswe.org/
46.
Strug, D., & Wilmore-Schaeffer, R. (2003). Fathers in the social work literature: Policy and practice implications. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 84, 503-511.
47.
Taylor, B.J., Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. ( 2003). Hidden gems: Systematically searching electronic databases for research publications for social work and social care. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 423-439.
48.
Taylor & Francis. (2008). Taylor & Francis Group achieves impressive growth in the annual Journal Citation Reports. Retrieved July 19, 2008, from http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/press/Impact_Factors-2007.pdf
49.
Taylor, B.J., Wylie, E., Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. ( 2006). An evaluation of the AgeInfo database. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence . Retrieved January 20, 2007, from http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/reports/report13.pdf
50.
Taylor, B.J., Wylie, E., Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. ( 2007). Systematically retrieving research: A case study evaluating seven databases. Research on Social Work Practice , 17, 697-706.
51.
Tomaiuolo, N.G. ( 1993, August). Social Work Abstracts Plus on compact disc. CD-ROM World, 79-81.
