Objective: A questionnaire to examine efforts toward the teaching of empirically supported interventions (ESI) was mailed to the 165 deans and directors of Council on Social Work Education-accredited Master’s in social work (MSW) programs; 66 (40%) responded. Method: Questions included program characteristics and items assessing both faculty and official program positions on ESI, which were summed to provide scores as an index of commitment to ESI. Results: Informal faculty commitment to teaching ESI was significantly higher than official program commitment, and offering more clinical practice courses was associated with greater program commitment. Factor analysis extracted two components from program emphasis on theoretical models in the overall practice curriculum: (a) experiential and (b) behavioral/systems; correlation of factor scores for these two components, as yielded from regression, with commitment scores, showed that the behavioral/systems component was significantly associated with greater faculty and program commitment. Conclusion: Study limitations are discussed and recommendations address how the findings apply to social work educators and innovations for promoting empirical practice in the MSW curriculum.
American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force. (2005). Position paper. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
Bilsker, D., & Goldner, E. M. (2000). Teaching evidence-based practice in mental health. Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 664-669.
3.
Chambless, D. L. (2005). Compendium of empirically supported therapies. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. Hill (Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (2nd ed., pp. 183-192). New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
5.
Cournoyer, B. R. (2004). Evidence-based social work skills book. Boston: Pearson.
6.
Dunlop, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Valow, J. B, & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170-177.
7.
Gambrill, E. (1994). What’s in a name? Task-centered, empirical, and behavioral practice. Social Service Review, 68, 578-599.
8.
Gambrill, E. (1999). Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice. Families in Society, 80, 341-350.
9.
Gambrill, E. (2001). Social work: An authority-based profession. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 166-175.
10.
Gibbs, L. (2005). Review of the book Developing practice guidelines for social work intervention: Issues, methods, and research agenda. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 137-139.
11.
Gibbs, L., & Gambrill, E. (2002). Evidence-based practice: Counterarguments to objections. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 452-476.
12.
Gilgun, J. F. (2005). The four cornerstones of evidence-based practice in social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 52-61.
13.
Gotham, H. J. (2004). Diffusion of mental health and substance abuse treatments: Development, dissemination and implementation. Clinical Psychology, 11, 160-176.
14.
Horwath, J., & Thurlow, C. (2004). Preparing students for evidence-based child and family field social work: An experiential learning approach. Social Work Education, 23, 7-24.
15.
Howard, M. O., & Jenson, J. O. (1999). Clinical practice guidelines: Should social work develop them? Research on Social Work Practice, 9, 283-301.
16.
Howard, M. O., McMillen, C. J., & Pollio, D. F. (2003). Teaching evidence-based practice: Toward a new paradigm for social work education. Research on Social Work Practice, 13, 234-259.
17.
Lambert, M. M., Bybee, T., Houston, R., Bishop, M., Sanders, D., Wilkinso, R., et al. (2005). Compendium of psychotherapy treatment manuals. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, S. Hill (Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (2nd ed., pp. 192-202). New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
McNeece, C. A., & Thyer, B. A. (2004). Evidence-based practice and social work. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 1, 7-25.
19.
Norcross, J. C., Beutler, L. E., & Levant, R. F. (2005). Prologue. In J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions (pp. 3-12). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
Ollendick, T. H., & King, N. J. (2005). Empirically supported treatments typically produce outcomes superior to non-empirically supported treatment therapies. In J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions (pp. 308-317). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
Patterson, J. E., Miller, R. B., Carnes, S., & Wilson, S. (2004). Evidence-based practice for marriage and family therapists. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 30, 183-195.
22.
Raw, S. D. (1998). Who is to define effective treatment for social work clients? Social Work, 43, 81-86.
23.
Rosen, A. (2003). Evidence-based social work practice: Challenges and promise. Social Work Research, 27, 197-208.
24.
Rosen, A., Proctor, E. K., & Staudt, M. (1999). Social work research and the quest for effective practice. Social Work Research, 2, 4-14.
25.
Rubin, A. (2005, November 18). New web link for EBP Survey. Message posted to electronic mailing list of social work educators. Retrieved on November 18, 2005, from http://sswl.sw.utexas.edu/ebp
26.
Shernoff, E. S., Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2003). Training in evidence-based interventions (EBIs): What are school psychology programs teaching? Journal of School Psychology, 41, 467-483.
27.
Shlonsky, A., & Gibbs, L. (2004). Will the real evidence-based practice please stand up: Teaching the process of evidence-based practice to the helping professions. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4, 137-153.
28.
Thyer, B. A., & Wodarski, J. S. (1998). Handbook of empirical social work practice: Mental disorders, Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.
29.
Witkin, S. L. (1998). The right to effective treatment and the effective treatment of rights: Rhetorical empiricism and the politics of research. Social Work, 43, 75-80.
30.
Witkin, S. L., & Harrison, W. D. (2001). Whose evidence and for what purpose? Social Work, 46, 293-296.
31.
Wodarski, J. S., & Thyer, B. A. (1998). Handbook of empirical social work practice: Social problems and practice issues, Vol. 2. New York: Wiley.
32.
Woody, S. R., Weisz, J., & McLean, C. (2005). Empirically supported treatments: 10 years later. Clinical Psychologist, 58, 5-11.
