Objective: The current study seeks to provide estimates of the adequacy of journal coverage in the Social Work Abstracts (SWA) database. Method: A total of 23 journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports social work category during the 1997 to 2005 period were selected for study. Issue-level coverage estimates were obtained for SWA and PsycINFO, the comparison database. Results: Both databases provided less than optimal coverage of social work journals, and SWA performed significantly worse than did PsycINFO. Both databases provided better coverage of National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Press journals than non—NASW Press journals. Conclusion: The results provide evidence of substantial deficits in SWA that merit serious concern.
Allen, M., Jacobs, S.K., & Levy, J.R. (2006). Mapping the literature of nursing: 1996-2000. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94, 206-220.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2006). PsycINFO database information. Retrieved July 30, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/psycinfo/products/psycinfo.html
3.
Arnold, S.J., Bender, V.F., & Brown, S.A. (2006). A review and comparison of psychology related electronic resources. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 3(2), 61-80.
4.
Beebe, L., & Payne, A.H. (1989). Users guide to Social Work Abstracts. Silver Spring: MD: National Association of Social Workers .
5.
Benjamin, L.T., & VandenBos, G.R. (2006). The window on psychology's literature: A history of Psychological Abstracts. American Psychologist, 61, 941-954.
6.
Boaz, A., & Sidford, A. (2006). Reviewing existing research. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), From postgraduate to social scientist: A guide to key skills (pp. 7-24). London: Sage.
7.
Cherry, A.L. (2000). A research primer for the helping professions . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ Thomson.
8.
Cohen, D., Wong, S.E., Gomory, T., Lacasse, J., Saleeby, D., Kirk, S.A., et al. (2006). Open letter to NASW regarding "Adherence Initiative for Schizophrenia" sponsored by Janssen, L. P. Retrieved July 19, 2007, from, http://www.manufacturedconsensus.net/index_old.html
9.
Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Coren, E., & Fisher, M. (2006). The conduct of systematic research reviews for SCIE knowledge reviews. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
11.
Counsell, C. (1997). Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine , 127, 380-387.
12.
CSWE Social Work Librarians Group. (2000, February 26). CSWE Librarians Group business meeting minutes, New York. Retrieved September 28, 2006, from http://ssweorg.securesites.net/swlibrarians/2000minutes.htm
13.
Dahwan, S.M., & Gupta, B.M. (2004). Comparative evaluation of Indian physics research: Impact factor vs. citations frequency. Current Science, 86, 1194-1195.
14.
Dudley, J.R. (2005). Research methods for social work. Boston: Pearson Education.
15.
Dworak-Peck, S., & Battle, M.G. (1989). Foreword. In L. Beebe & A. H. Payne (Eds.), Users guide to social work abstracts. Silver Spring: MD: National Association of Social Workers .
16.
Fava, G.A., & Ottolini, F. (2000). Impact factors versus actual citations. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 69, 285-286.
17.
Friedman, B.D. (2006). The research toolkit (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.
Garfield, E. (1996). How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal, 313, 411-413.
20.
Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161, 979-980.
21.
Gibbs, L.E. (2003). Evidence-based practice for the helping professions . Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole-Thomson.
22.
Gifford, G. (2004, Spring). One social work librarian's view of evidenced based practice. Simmons College Libraries, College Library Newsletter, p. 6.
23.
Graham, J.R., Al-Krenawi, A., & Bradshaw, C. (2000). The Social Work Research Group/NASWResearch Section/Council on Social Work Research, 1949-1965: An emerging research identity in theAmerican profession. Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 622-643.
24.
Grayson, L., & Gomersall, A. (2003). A difficult business: Finding the evidence for social science reviews (ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice Working Paper 19). Retrieved November 18, 2006, from http://evidencenetwork.org/Documents/wp19.pdf
25.
Green, R., Baskind, F., & Bellin, M. (2002). Robert Green, Frank Baskind, and Melissa Bellin reply. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 492-495.
26.
Gumz, E.J. (2004). American social work, corrections and restorative justice: An appraisal. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 449-460.
27.
Hay, P.J., Adams, C.E., & Lefebvre, C. (1996). The efficiency of searches for randomized controlled trials in the International Journal of Eating Disorders: A comparison of handsearching, EMBASE and PsychLit. Health Libraries Review, 13, 91-96.
28.
Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. (2005a). Shallow science or meta-cognitive insights: A few thoughts on bibliometrics. Social Work in Health Care , 41, 129-148.
29.
Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. (2005b). Tracing thought through time and space: A selective review of bibliometrics in social work. Social Work in Health Care, 41, 1-34.
30.
Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., Barker, K., & Onghena, P. (2006). An assessment of the predictive validity of impact factor scores: Implications for academic employment decisions in social work . Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 613-624.
31.
Jacoby, B.E., Murray, J., Alterman, I., & Welbourne, P. (2002). Resource selection for an interdisciplinary field: A methodology. Journal of the Medical Library Association , 90, 393-399.
32.
Jasco, P. (1994). The hidden dimension of databases. Database Magazine, 17(2), 40-45.
33.
Jasco, P. (1998). Analyzing the journal coverage of abstracting/indexing databases at variable aggregate and analytic levels. Library & Information Science Research, 20, 133-151.
34.
Jasco, P. (2001). Content evaluation of textual CD-ROM and web databases . Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited .
35.
Jenson, J. (2005). Structural factors and the quality of publication in social work journals. Social Work Research, 29, 67-71.
36.
Kemp, B.E., & Brustman, M.J. (1997). Social policy research: Comparison and analysis of CD-ROM resources. Social Work Research , 21, 111-120.
37.
Kirk, S. (1994). A new beginning. Social Work Research , 18, 3-4.
38.
Kurmis, A.P. (2003). Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 85A, 2449-2454.
39.
Leighninger, R.D. (2006). The perils of self-censorship. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 33(4), 9-10.
40.
Matthews, E.J., Edwards, A.G.K., Barker, J., Bloor, M., Covey, J., Hood, K., et al. (1999). Efficient searching in diffuse topics: Lessons from a systematic review of research on communicating risk to patients in primary care. Health Libraries Review, 16, 112-120.
41.
McManus, R.J., Wilson, S., Delaney, B.C., Fitzmaurice, D.A., Hyde, C.J., Tobias, R.S., et al. (1998). Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 317, 1562-1563. Retrieved January 25, 2007, from http://www.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/317/7172/1562
42.
Mendelsohn, H.N. (1984). Social work online. Database, 7(3), 36-49.
43.
Mendelsohn, H.N. (1986). Searching Social Work Abstracts: A review. Database, 9(1), 22-27.
44.
Midgley, J. (2006). International social work, globalization and the challenge of a unipolar world. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 33(4), 11-18.
45.
Moed, H.F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
46.
National Association of Social Workers Florida. ( 2007). Presenter contract for the New Directions in Professional Social Work conference. Tallahassee: Author.
47.
Ovid. (2006). Social Work Abstracts Plus. Retrieved November 18, 2006, from http://evidencenetwork.org/Documents/wp19.pdf
48.
Pravikoff, D.S. (2004). The evidence-based practice dilemma. CINAHL News, 23(1), 6-7.
49.
Rizzo, V.M., & Rowe, J.M. (2006). Studies of the cost-effectiveness of social work services in aging: A review of the literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 67-73.
50.
Rosenberg, G., Holden, G., & Barker, K. (2005). What happens to our ideas? A bibliometric analysis of articles in Social Work in Health Care in the 1990s. Social Work in Health Care, 41(3-4), 35-66.
51.
Royse, D. (2004). Research methods in social work (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA; Brooks/Cole .
52.
Schilling, R., Baer, J.C., Barth, R., Fraser, M., Herman, D., Holden, G., et al. (2005). Peer review and publication standards in social work journals: The Miami Statement. Social Work Research , 29, 119-121.
53.
Seglen, P.O. (1994). Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 1-11.
54.
Seglen, P.O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314, 498-502. Retrieved February 17, 2003, from http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7079/497
55.
Shek, D.T.L. (2006). Assessment of perceived parental psychological control in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 382-391.
56.
Shek, D.T.L., Siu, A.M.H., & Lee, T.Y. (2006). The Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: A validation study. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 380-391.
57.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58.
Stoesz, D. (2002). From social work to human services. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 29(4), 19-37.
59.
Stover, M. (1993, September). The best family studies databases on CD-ROM-A survey of nine products. CR-ROM Professional, pp. 48-52.
60.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Computer assisted research design and analysis . Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
61.
Taylor, B.J., Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. (2003). Hidden gems: Systematically searching electronic databases for research publications for social work and social care. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 423-439.
62.
Taylor, B.J., Wylie, E., Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. (2006). An evaluation of the AgeInfo database. Retrieved January 20, 2007, from http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/reports/report13.pdf
63.
Taylor, B.J., Wylie, E., Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. (2007). Systematically retrieving research: A case study evaluating seven databases. Research on Social Work Practice , 17, 697-706.
64.
Thomson Scientific. (2004). The Thomson Scientific journal selection process. Retrieved February 16, 2007, from http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/journalselection/
65.
Thomson Scientific. (2006). Help index: Impact factor. Software documentation from Thomson ISI. Retrieved January 23, 2007, from http://scientific.thomson.com/
66.
Thomson Scientific. (2007). Journal citation reports. Retrieved January 23, 2007, from http://scientific.thomson.com/media/presentrep/facts/0108jcrfs.pdf
67.
Tomaiuolo, N.G. (1993, August). Social Work Abstracts Plus on compact disc. CD-ROM World, pp. 79-81.
68.
Ulrichsweb Online. (2007). Ulrich's periodical directory. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from http://www.ulrichsweb.com/ulrichsweb/
