Within a game we can specify all positions, all objects, all rules by
which they are connected. In short, a game is a complete,
self-consistent system in which people submit themselves completely
to the rules [Back, 1963: 68].
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, G.T. (1969) "Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis ." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.63 (September): 689-718.
2.
Back, K.W. (1963) "The game and the myth as two languages of social science." Behavioral Sci.8 (January): 66-71.
3.
Binder, A. (1966) "Learning and extinction of leadership preferences in small groups." J. of Mathematical Psychology3: 129-139.
4.
Boocock, S. and J. Coleman (1966) "Games with simulated environments in learning ." Sociology of Education39 (Summer): 215-236.
5.
Bruner, J.S. (1961) The Process of Education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
6.
Brunner, R.D. and G.D. Brewer (1971) Organized Complexity: Empirical Theories of Political Development. New York: Free Press .
7.
Dalkey, N.C. (1967) Delphi. Santa Monica, Calif. : RAND.
8.
DeWeerd, H.A. (1967) Political-Military Scenarios. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND.
9.
Fishman, G.S. and P.J. Kiviat (1967) Digital Computer Simulation: Statistical Considerations . Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND.
10.
Gold, M.M. and A.C. Stedry (1964) The Effect of Role Playing in a Problem-Solving Situation. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Tech Graduate School of Industrial Administration.
11.
Goldhamer, H. and H. Speier (1959) "Some observations on political gaming." World Politics12: 71-83.
12.
Hall, E.J. et al. (1963) "Group problem solving effectiveness under conditions of pooling vs. interaction." J. of Social Psychology59: 147-157.
13.
Hoggatt, A.C. (1967) "Measuring the cooperativeness of behavior in quantity variation duopoly games." Behavioral Sci.12 (March).
14.
--- J. Esherick, and J.T. Wheeler (1969) "A laboratory to facilitate computer-controlled behavioral experiments." Administrative Sci. Q.14 (June): 202-207.
15.
Lasswell, H.D. (1971) "The continuing decision seminar as a technique for instruction." Policy Sci.2 (March): 43-57.
16.
McKeachie, W.J. (1963) "Research on teaching at the college and university level," in N. C. Gage (ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
17.
Meeker, R.J., G.A. Shure, and W. Rogers (1962) A Review of the Group Decision-Making Research Projects. Santa Monica, Calif.: System Development Corporation.
18.
Messick, D.M. and A. Rapoport (1964) "Computer-controlled experiments in psychology ." Behavioral Sci.9: 378-382.
19.
Moore, L.F. (1967) "Business games versus case studies as tools of learning." Training and Development J.21 (October): 13-23.
20.
Noel, R. (1969) "The POLIS laboratory." Amer. Behavioral Scientist (July/August) : 30-35.
21.
Paxson, E.W. (1971) Summary of the XRAY Political-Military Exercises . Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND.
22.
Raia, A.P. (1966) "A study of the educational value of management games." J. of Business39 (July): 339-352.
23.
Robinson, J.A., F.L. Anderson, M.G. Hermann, and R.C. Snyder (1966) "Teaching with inter-nation simulation and case studies." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.60: 53-66.
24.
Shubik, M. (1970) "An experimental oligopoly business game: part II, some theory, mathematical structure and parameters." Yale University Department of Administrative Sciences Report 36.
25.
——— [ed.] (1964) Game Theory and Related Approaches to Social Behavior. New York: John Wiley .
26.
Shure, G.H. and R.J. Meeker (1969) "A computer-based experimental laboratory." Administrative Sci. Q.14 (June): 286-293.
27.
Taylor, D.W., P.C. Berry, and C.H. Black (1958) "Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking?" Administrative Sci. Q.3: 23-47.
