Does the content of political science courses affect civic learning? The authors examine whether differences in students' self-reported knowledge, cynicism, and participation depend on whether their American government course included a character-playing simulation. The authors use an innovative longitudinal, quasi-experimental research design to test not only for immediate effects but also for those that differentiated the two groups 3 years after they took the course. Differential effects of the simulation at the end of the particular course are virtually nonexistent. Three years later, however, students who had the simulation reported more understanding of the concepts taught in the simulation than did the control group. They also emerged less politically cynical. No differences were observed, however, on items reflecting political participation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Althaus, S. L. (2002). American news consumption during times of national crisis. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(3), 517-521.
2.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.
3.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
4.
Brady, H., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271-294.
5.
Brown, S. W., & King, F. B. (2000). Constructivist pedagogy and how we learn: Educational psychology meets international studies. International Studies Perspective, 1(3), 245-254.
6.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Dallas, TX: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (Eds.). (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Citrin, J. (1974). Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. American Political Science Review, 68(4), 973-988.
9.
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Eyler, J., & Halteman, B. (1981). The impact of a legislative internship on students' political science skill and sophistication. Teaching Political Science, 9, 27-34.
11.
Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286-290.
12.
Felder, R. M. (1996). Matters of style. ASEE Prism, 6(4), 18-23.
13.
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
14.
Fowler, F. J., Jr. (1993). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Gaines, B. J. (2002). Where's the rally? Approval and trust of the President, Cabinet, Congress and government since September 11. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(3), 531-536.
16.
Graber, D. A. (1994). Why voters fail information tests: Can the hurdles be overcome? Political Communication, 11(4), 331-346.
17.
Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance.
18.
Hamilton, L. (2000). What I wish political scientists would teach about Congress. PS: Political Science and Politics, 33(4), 757-764.
19.
Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(3), 791-808.
20.
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1995). Congress as public enemy: Public attitudes toward American political institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Kolb, D. A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. C. A. Associates (Ed.), The modern American college (pp. 232-255). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
McKeachie, W. J. (2002). McKeachie's teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (11th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
23.
Meyers, C., & Jones, T. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government, 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68(4), 989-1001.
25.
Montgomery, S. M., & Groat, L. N. (1998). Student learning styles and their implications for teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Research on Learning and Teaching Occasional Paper.
26.
Niemi, R., & Junn, J. (1998). Civic education: What makes students learn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rockquemore, K. A., & Schaffer, R. H. (2000). Toward a theory of engagement: A cognitive mapping of service-learning experiences. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7, 14-24.
29.
Rosenstone, S., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
30.
Sinclair, B. (2000). Unorthodox lawmaking: New legislative processes in the U.S. Congress (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
31.
Strage, A. A. (2000). Service-learning: Enhancing student learning outcomes in a college-level course. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7, 5-13.
32.
Svinicki, M. D., Hagen, A. S., & Meyer, D. K. (1996). How research on learning strengthens instruction. In R. J. Menges & M. Weimer (Eds.), Teaching on solid ground: Using scholarship to improve practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
Teixeira, R. A. (1992). The disappearing American voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
34.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
